06-13-2003, 08:50 AM | #1 | ||
College Prospect
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nebraska
|
ATI to supply Xbox 2 Graphics (or Xbox Next)
Great move Microsoft.... ATI has the most powerful graphics chip's on the market.... I personally own a 9700 pro and it's been the best video card I've ever had.... It's getting 14526 points in 3DMark01 and 4896 points in 3DMark03, what a fast card... So good choice Microsoft.... Check link below;
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/31189.html
__________________
JJ Smitty Owner of the TheC.F.L. - Come by and check us out. Last edited by A-Husker-4-Life : 06-13-2003 at 08:51 AM. |
||
06-13-2003, 08:52 AM | #2 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kansas
|
Crap, there goes ATI's momentum on nVidia.
|
06-13-2003, 12:44 PM | #3 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
|
"ATI has the most powerful graphics chip's on the market"
As of recently, this is no longer true. The new GeForce that is out (or will be out soon) beata the Radeon 9800 Pro (ATI's best card). |
06-13-2003, 12:49 PM | #4 |
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
I prefer Ruffles chips.
|
06-13-2003, 01:02 PM | #5 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nebraska
|
Your crazy Sabotai, the new 256mb DDRII 9800 Pro still beats the new FX5900 ultra in High Res. benchmarks.... I'll find the site that the benchmarks are on......
__________________
JJ Smitty Owner of the TheC.F.L. - Come by and check us out. |
06-13-2003, 01:13 PM | #6 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
|
From the July issue of CGW.
System: 3 Ghz Pentium, 1 GB DDR 400 and 240GB Seagate SATA RAID config. The test results are at 32-bit, 4x anti-aliasing and 4x anisotropic filtering. The cards: 256MB Geforce FX 5900 Ultra 128MB ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 3dMark2003 (1024x768) Geforce: 3532 Radeon: 2595 3DMark2003 (1600x1200) Geforce: 2138 Radeon: 1363 3DGameGuage 3.0 (1024x768) Geforce: 83 Radeon: 84 3DGameGuage 3.0 (1600x1200) Geforce: 69 Radeon: 56 |
06-13-2003, 01:17 PM | #7 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
|
As far the most recent Radeon card (which has just been released), the cards are pretty comparable.
http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0...-21217743.html The 3DMark2003 build 330 tests are pretty much equal as are the Splinter Cell tests. But for whatever reason, the Geforce torches the Radeon in the Unreal Tournament 2003 test. EDIT: http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/...x5900upd.shtml HotHardware also has the cards pretty much neck and neck on their benchmarks, except when you turn on 4x AA, at which point the Geforce takes a sizable lead. Ahem...who's crazy? Last edited by sabotai : 06-13-2003 at 01:23 PM. |
06-13-2003, 02:15 PM | #8 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kansas
|
You forgot to mention the 3dMark tests were taken with the nVidia 3dMark "optimized" drivers.
Last edited by Calis : 06-13-2003 at 02:17 PM. |
06-13-2003, 02:16 PM | #9 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nebraska
|
http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files...fx5900upd.shtml
Look at the 3Dmark03 bench after the 330 patch has been installed... Yeah, the 5900 beats the 9800 but only by small margins; 9800 - 2940 pts 4x on 5747 pts 4x off 5900 - 3098 pts 4x on 4886 pts 4x off I wouldn't call that a sizable lead, I would call it a tie.....
__________________
JJ Smitty Owner of the TheC.F.L. - Come by and check us out. |
06-13-2003, 02:22 PM | #10 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
That is good information to know since, like most people, I only use my computer for running benchmarks!
|
06-13-2003, 03:24 PM | #11 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Mad City, WI
|
I want the 9800 Pro for the improved graphics quality when I play Minesweeper and Solitaire.
|
06-13-2003, 03:50 PM | #12 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
|
"I wouldn't call that a sizable lead, I would call it a tie....."
Look at the Unreal Tournmant 2003 tests with 4x AA turned on and try to say the same thing. "That is good information to know since, like most people, I only use my computer for running benchmarks!" Which is why I tend to give more weight the tests run with the games rather than with benchmark software. |
06-13-2003, 11:54 PM | #14 |
In The Penalty Box
Join Date: May 2003
Location: To reveal my location, you must decipher a series of traps, each more deadly than the last.
|
I think nVidia is a bit more popular because I see more nVidia chipsets in computers. But this isnt necessarily a bad move to go to ATi, they're the card to beat.
|
06-14-2003, 01:50 AM | #15 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
|
I don't think either is "the card to beat". Every couple of months, the other releases there "new" card that supposedly beats the competitor's last card. For the most part, it is a neck and neck race. It just so happens today the best Geforce beats out the best ATI. In a couple of months, it will most likely be the other way around. And then a few more months, it'll switch again...
I don't know about this grid thing. I've never trusted anything that was "all in one". Anyone remember those shitty sound card/modem cards? Ugh... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|