![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
n00b
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Something I just now noticed...or am I wrong?
I'm sure this has been covered at some point... but I just now noticed, there is no right or left hand designation for QBs. (or L/R foot for K/P)
I have been basing all my teams' offensive lines as if my QB was a righty... good pass blocking on the left side to protect my QB's blind side , the right side guy tended to be more of a run blocker. I'm just now realizing that I don't see where it says anywhere... How does this affect 'strategy' per se when it comes to putting together an OL... is my idea of pass block LT and run block RT still viable? Should I now go for more balance between RB/PB? Am I missing something completely? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
All QBs in FOF are considered to be right handed, but not sure it matters anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
I did some testing on RT vs. LT and the average stats were almost exactly the same with a good LT/Mediocre RT and the reverse. So don't sweat it too much
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
|
Jim had an informal live-chat during the NFL draft. From what I remember, this topic came up then, and he basically said that the LT is weighted heavier in offensive line calculations. This would imply that all QB's in FOF "are" right-handed if the value of the LT has significance in offensive line protection calculation (protecting the blind spot of the QB).
Last edited by RedKingGold : 03-16-2008 at 09:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
|
Wonder what extra information someone could get from Jim by taking a piss in the next stall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
I also seem to recall a discussion about handedness in general, although not exactly where. It also makes sense by the fact that we know in-game that LTs are more valuable than RTs. Last edited by Vinatieri for Prez : 03-16-2008 at 10:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
Try position switching a RT to LT. Mine typically only retain 92-ish % of their skills, indicating that LT is more difficult to play; hence, more valuable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Budapest
|
What are the implications here on defense? I was thinking that I would outsmart the opposition by putting my best pass-rusher at LDE to get him matched up against the weaker tackle. In theory, the RDE should get more strip sacks, right? while the LDE would get more hurries. but i've never seen this stated explicitly.
__________________
What the hell is Mike Brown diagramming for them during timeouts? Is he like the guy from "Memento" or something? Guys, I just thought of something … what if we ran a high screen for LeBron? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Mascot
Join Date: Nov 2000
|
I just assume that whenever it says LT it really means "blind side" tackle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: East Anglia
|
Maybe this is just anecdotal on my part, but it sure seems to me the better DEs in the game wind up as LDEs, thus making the RT stuck covering the better guy. Maybe it's just a total coincidence of how the player files wind up, but in my solo play almost always the stronger end is the LDE.
__________________
Molon labe |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
|
We suspend the laws of supply and demand around here, VfP. *shurg*
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|