Anyone interested in a faster turnaround league?

Kodos · 08-25-2008, 04:34 PM

I couldn't commish it because you can only commish 1 league, but I was wondering if there might be a segment of people who'd prefer a faster turnaround, like 4 days or something.

DeToxRox · 08-25-2008, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos

I couldn't commish it because you can only commish 1 league, but I was wondering if there might be a segment of people who'd prefer a faster turnaround, like 4 days or something.

Definetly. I have too much time on my hands after this week, but I couldn't commish it either

Radii · 08-25-2008, 04:38 PM

I'd be up for it. I pretty much have all the free time in the world at the moment and would dig a second league.

Kodos · 08-25-2008, 04:39 PM

The week turnarounds just make things seem to move at a glacial pace. We'll only get 3 or 4 seasons in before NCAA 2010 comes. I'd probably even support a 3-day turnaround.

Galaxy · 08-25-2008, 05:26 PM

I'll have to think about it. 3 leagues is a lot. I think that we should maybe look at shortening the time frame in the current leagues.

Eaglesfan27 · 08-25-2008, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy

I'll have to think about it. 3 leagues is a lot. I think that we should maybe look at shortening the time frame in the current leagues.

My thoughts as well.

Mike1409 · 08-25-2008, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy

I think that we should maybe look at shortening the time frame in the current leagues.

I agree with this.

Galaxy · 08-25-2008, 05:36 PM

As a member of the RFL and NOFL, I would support a proposal if the commissioners wanted to post a poll for a vote in adjusting the time frames. And if the EBFL wanted to as well, they can.

Galaxy · 08-25-2008, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eaglesfan27

My thoughts as well.

I'm really enjoying my time with Mississippi State (NOFL) and Notre Dame (RFL). I'm slowly becoming attached to these teams (even more so than a solo dynasty) and that will grow as I get my recruits coming in.

Bigsmooth · 08-25-2008, 05:58 PM

I'd really like to speed things up in the RFL as opposed to starting a new league. Like Galaxy said, it's nice to get attached to some players and have "meaningful" games unlike solo dynasties. As it stands now, it's been over 2 full weeks since I've played a game with my Huskies (stupid bye).

Logan · 08-25-2008, 08:06 PM

I would definitely be up for speeding up the EBFL. 4 days would be the best I can do.

Radii · 08-25-2008, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan

I would definitely be up for speeding up the EBFL. 4 days would be the best I can do.

I'd be for that as well, and hopping in one of the other leagues when some inevitable attrition occurs instead of trying to start a 4th one.

Anthony · 08-25-2008, 08:38 PM

i definitely think we need to speed up the current leagues rather than start a 4th. i would think the RFL would be the best choice since to me it was kinda started to be a sister/tag-along/alternate league on the side in conjunction to NOFL and EBFL. i don't want to say i'm losing interest, that's too harsh, but in the case of NOFL where i (and everyone else) have started out as a low ranked team i need the seasons to move along so that i can begin to transition my team to the next level. at the current pace i'll not only not be able to see meaningful developement in the Duke program, but may never progress fast enough to have the option to jump to a better program.

i'm done complaining, i don't want to poo poo on all the hard work that the commishes do, but yeah, moving the current existing leagues along faster would be best.

cmp · 08-25-2008, 08:47 PM

I definitely think a faster turnaround would be a good idea.

PurdueBrad · 08-25-2008, 09:21 PM

Agree on the faster turnarounds as well.

DeToxRox · 08-25-2008, 09:24 PM

I am all for it, but we'll see how everyone else in EBFL feels first.

Galaxy · 08-25-2008, 09:24 PM

DeTox, Kodos put up a poll for the RFL as well.

Raiders Army · 08-26-2008, 06:51 AM

faster pussycat

BigDPW · 08-26-2008, 08:31 AM

I would be okay with a 4-5 day turnaround. I may occasionally miss out on a week but I am willing to do that to keep things moving...

08-25-2008, 04:39 PM	#4
Kodos Resident Alien Join Date: Jun 2001	The week turnarounds just make things seem to move at a glacial pace. We'll only get 3 or 4 seasons in before NCAA 2010 comes. I'd probably even support a 3-day turnaround. __________________ Author of The Bill Gates Challenge, as well as other groundbreaking dynasties. Last edited by Kodos : 08-25-2008 at 04:39 PM.

08-25-2008, 05:26 PM	#5
Galaxy Coordinator Join Date: Apr 2005	I'll have to think about it. 3 leagues is a lot. I think that we should maybe look at shortening the time frame in the current leagues. Last edited by Galaxy : 08-25-2008 at 05:27 PM.

08-25-2008, 05:36 PM	#8
Galaxy Coordinator Join Date: Apr 2005	As a member of the RFL and NOFL, I would support a proposal if the commissioners wanted to post a poll for a vote in adjusting the time frames. And if the EBFL wanted to as well, they can. Last edited by Galaxy : 08-25-2008 at 05:37 PM.

08-25-2008, 08:38 PM	#13
Anthony Banned Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Astoria, NY, USA	i definitely think we need to speed up the current leagues rather than start a 4th. i would think the RFL would be the best choice since to me it was kinda started to be a sister/tag-along/alternate league on the side in conjunction to NOFL and EBFL. i don't want to say i'm losing interest, that's too harsh, but in the case of NOFL where i (and everyone else) have started out as a low ranked team i need the seasons to move along so that i can begin to transition my team to the next level. at the current pace i'll not only not be able to see meaningful developement in the Duke program, but may never progress fast enough to have the option to jump to a better program. i'm done complaining, i don't want to poo poo on all the hard work that the commishes do, but yeah, moving the current existing leagues along faster would be best. Last edited by Anthony : 08-25-2008 at 08:38 PM.

08-25-2008, 04:38 PM	#3
Radii Head Coach Join Date: Jul 2001	I'd be up for it. I pretty much have all the free time in the world at the moment and would dig a second league.

08-25-2008, 05:58 PM	#10
Bigsmooth College Prospect Join Date: Dec 2006	I'd really like to speed things up in the RFL as opposed to starting a new league. Like Galaxy said, it's nice to get attached to some players and have "meaningful" games unlike solo dynasties. As it stands now, it's been over 2 full weeks since I've played a game with my Huskies (stupid bye).

08-25-2008, 08:06 PM	#11
Logan Head Coach Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: NYC	I would definitely be up for speeding up the EBFL. 4 days would be the best I can do.

08-25-2008, 08:47 PM	#14
cmp Pro Rookie Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Grand Rapids, MI	I definitely think a faster turnaround would be a good idea.

08-25-2008, 09:21 PM	#15
PurdueBrad Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: DeKalb, IL	Agree on the faster turnarounds as well.

08-25-2008, 09:24 PM	#16
DeToxRox Head Coach Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Michigan	I am all for it, but we'll see how everyone else in EBFL feels first.

08-26-2008, 06:51 AM	#18
Raiders Army Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: The Black Hole	faster pussycat

08-26-2008, 08:31 AM	#19
BigDPW College Prospect Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Raleigh, NC	I would be okay with a 4-5 day turnaround. I may occasionally miss out on a week but I am willing to do that to keep things moving...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)