BCS Rankings for Week 3 (ping HornedFrog)

[cthomer5000]

The top 10:

Oklahoma	Big 12
USC		Pac 10
Florida State	ACC
Miami		Big East
Ohio State	Big 10
Va Tech		Big East
LSU		SEC
Michigan	Big 10
TCU		C. USA
Georgia		SEC

For the detailed standings, check out ESPN

What really jumps off the page to me is the incredibly real possibility of TCU making a BCS game. Now, we won't be talking about a run at the national title game, but they have a chance to bring home some serious cash if they win out.

Thoughts anyone?

[HornedFrog Purple]

Well I don't want to say anything to jinx it heh

I am taking the Gary Patterson approach, after the next 4 games then we will see what happens. I don't know if you read the other thread about the playoffs etc, but this would be a dream come true to get into a BCS game. I would be happy and the money would go to improve the facilities.

3 of their next 4 games are going to be tough. Louisville has the 9th ranked offense in the country, Cincy plays the spread which gives the Frogs trouble sometimes and going to Southern Miss is a hard game to win.

This has all happened with our starting QB out for most of the season, down to our 3rd string tailback for part and the loss of 2 of our starting secondary which had 3 new faces to begin with.

Moreover it would be great to see a team who has had only 6 Texas Top 100 players (no national Top 100) taken in the last 5 years screw the system. No one wanted LT, he was too small.

No matter what happens, kids in Texas are going to start to realize there is good football being played here besides Austin, College Station and Lubbock.

[tucker342]

Looks about right

[kcchief19]

Somebody will get squeeze out of a BCS spot after Missouri runs the table, wins the Big XII North, and upsets Oklahoma for the automatic bid.

I'm going to have a seat on the FOFC couch while I wait for the_meanstrosity to come in and kick me in the nuts.

[JPhillips]

What jumps out to me is seeing seven conferences represented in the top 10. With so much league play left this is really surprising. With the Michigan/OSU game and the possible LSU/Georgia title game two of these teams could drop out, but it looks like eight of these ten could be here at the end.

[primelord]

Originally posted by kcchief19
Somebody will get squeeze out of a BCS spot after Missouri runs the table, wins the Big XII North, and upsets Oklahoma for the automatic bid.

I'm going to have a seat on the FOFC couch while I wait for the_meanstrosity to come in and kick me in the nuts.

I was thinking the same thing.

[kingnebwsu]

Ohio State gets no respect I say. They probably won't win out, but I don't think they should be ranked #6/#7 in the polls. If they do win out, then they deserve a chance of playing in the tittie game.

[vex]

Originally posted by kingnebwsu
Ohio State gets no respect I say. They probably won't win out, but I don't think they should be ranked #6/#7 in the polls. If they do win out, then they deserve a chance of playing in the tittie game.

I don't think they should be ranked #6 or #7 either. Actually, I don't think they should be ranked in the top 10.

[TroyF]

Originally posted by vexroid
I don't think they should be ranked #6 or #7 either. Actually, I don't think they should be ranked in the top 10.

Yes, they should.

I thought last years OSU team was the real deal. They earned their title.

I don't think this years OSU team is all that great. I don't think they are a top ten team.

Thing is, who do you rank over the top of them?

A two loss Michigan team? The only one loss teams they are ranked over are Virginia Tech and LSU. (TCU doesn't really count here because we all know they aren't going to the national title game)

Even if you put Tech and LSU above them, they still aren't out of the top ten. I do think it's likely they'll lose two of the next three and take a nosedive. Still, they are right where they belong as of now.

If they win out, there could be a great case made for them to go back to the title game. (My choice would be USC if they run the table, but you could make a solid case that OSU should be there)

TroyF

[BishopMVP]

Since I don't have a horse in the race, I'm just going to hope for the maximum carnage possible. Either have USC, LSU, Miami, VT, F$U and Ohio St lose again and TCU stay undefeated or have Oklahoma lose and all those teams stay with 1-loss.

[Glengoyne]

Troy,

Knock it off, you are making too much sense lately. I am starting to sound like a TroyF fanboi here.

[TroyF]

Originally posted by Glengoyne
Troy,

Knock it off, you are making too much sense lately. I am starting to sound like a TroyF fanboi here.

Sorry. I'll try to do worse from now on.

TroyF

[SirFozzie]

Originally posted by kingnebwsu
If they do win out, then they deserve a chance of playing in the tittie game.

Wait a second.. Mike Price doesn't coach Ohio St.

[Honolulu_Blue]

Originally posted by kingnebwsu
Ohio State gets no respect I say. If they do win out, then they deserve a chance of playing in the tittie game.

The tittie game. Yes, they most certainly deserve a shot at the tittie game. They are a bunch of boobs after all.

[Honolulu_Blue]

Originally posted by cthomer5000
The top 10:

Oklahoma	Big 12
USC		Pac 10
Florida State	ACC
Miami		Big East
Ohio State	Big 10
Va Tech		Big East
LSU		SEC
Michigan	Big 10
TCU		C. USA
Georgia		SEC

For the detailed standings, check out ESPN

What really jumps off the page to me is the incredibly real possibility of TCU making a BCS game. Now, we won't be talking about a run at the national title game, but they have a chance to bring home some serious cash if they win out.

Thoughts anyone?

Wow, I guess EA Sports is not so bad after all. TCU is consistently in the top in my NCAA 2004 dynasty (and was so in my NCAA 2003 dynasty as well).

I found it deeply annoying. I tried to schedule them every year to beat them badly and put them in their place, along with Louisville and Fresno State.

[Huckleberry]

Originally posted by HornedFrog Purple
Moreover it would be great to see a team who has had only 6 Texas Top 100 players (no national Top 100) taken in the last 5 years screw the system. No one wanted LT, he was too small.

\

TCU took 11 players in the Consensus Texas Top 75 in the years 2000-2002 alone. Running back Tyson Thompson of Irving was a National Top 100 player.

The statement that "no one wanted LT" is also incorrect. There was certainly incorrect talent evaluation done, but Texas was interested in LT. We had filled up on RBs with Hodges Mitchell and Darnell McDonald.

[Butter]

What typically ends up happening with these non-BCS schools is they get a little too excited and end up slipping up on one of their games towards the end of the season. I actually hope that TCU maybe makes the Fiesta Bowl or something. But a lot of teams would have to lose to make that happen.

[HornedFrog Purple]

Originally posted by Huckleberry
\

TCU took 11 players in the Consensus Texas Top 75 in the years 2000-2002 alone. Running back Tyson Thompson of Irving was a National Top 100 player.

The statement that "no one wanted LT" is also incorrect. There was certainly incorrect talent evaluation done, but Texas was interested in LT. We had filled up on RBs with Hodges Mitchell and Darnell McDonald.

As usually the case, you are wrong. What he doesn't tell you is Tyson Thompson is not on the roster and has never been on the roster. The year 2000 was the Frogs best year with 2 in the Top 75. Read my statement again and you will see the light.

LT never got any communication PERIOD from UT. Anyone who told you that is dreaming. LT has gone on the record saying as such. I would suggest looking in the Waco-Tribune Herald for that record.

You can go back down to the Big-12 forum and bitch and moan about TCU and why no one is talking about Texas now. Dismissed.

[tucker342]

Originally posted by kingnebwsu
Ohio State gets no respect I say. They probably won't win out, but I don't think they should be ranked #6/#7 in the polls. If they do win out, then they deserve a chance of playing in the tittie game.

BULL SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Butter]

Originally posted by tucker342
BULL SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bitter much?

[Huckleberry]

Originally posted by HornedFrog Purple
As usually the case, you are wrong. What he doesn't tell you is Tyson Thompson is not on the roster and has never been on the roster. The year 2000 was the Frogs best year with 2 in the Top 75. Read my statement again and you will see the light.

LT never got any communication PERIOD from UT. Anyone who told you that is dreaming. LT has gone on the record saying as such. I would suggest looking in the Waco-Tribune Herald for that record.

You can go back down to the Big-12 forum and bitch and moan about TCU and why no one is talking about Texas now. Dismissed.

Wow, you sure get angry when you're wrong. I never said Tyson Thompson was on the roster. Guess what, Texas has taken top recruits that never made the roster either.


2002: Robert Merrill, Earl Anderson
2001: Mark Pierce, Tye Gunn, Mark Walker, Shane Sims
2000: Tyson Thompson, Brandon Johnson, Marvyn Godbolt, Kenny Boyd, Derrick Pope

Player issues such as legal problems, grades, and transfers have nothing to do with "taking" top players.

As for LT, you need to work more on reading what is actually written and not what you infer. You're right, Texas never contacted LT. Because, as I said, we had filled up on RBs. But our staff was aware of him and knew he was a good player. They screwed up, but they knew he was good.

By the way, you are the one who was dreadfully wrong on Texas' passing offense, but I suppose that has escaped your memory, right? I mean, little things like trying to educate others on who is making good reads in the Texas offense when you've got the read progression completely backwards really aren't that big a deal, so I understand.

[HornedFrog Purple]

yawn. Please don't paste things from hornfan.com.

Unfortunately, you actually agreed with me on the passing scheme of Texas but were so wrapped up in being argumentative you did not read a thing I said.

I am taking the same approach now.

Dismissed.

[Huckleberry]

Totally weak. You are completely incapable of addressing the argument at hand and continually resort to half-baked one-liners to try and back your way out of the debate.

Nothing was pasted from another site. That's the first attempt to avoid the topic.

You stated that our reads start out on the strong side when, in fact, greater than 90% of our passing plays start the read on the weak side. Not sure how that's agreeing with you, though I'd like to find out.

And, finally, your cute little "dismissed" comments are a feeble attempt to salvage some sort of pride despite the repeated attempts to get out while you still can. In case you haven't noticed, I wasn't combative with you on this thread until you began with the strategy of replacing reasoning with attitude. It's going well, keep it up.

[HornedFrog Purple]

No... I really am sick of dealing with you. Don't misread this please.

To me you are an idiot. I really can't make it any clearer than that.

[Huckleberry]

That's nice. Moving right along into ad hominem attacks, still completely void of addressing the argument.

One would think that the idiot would be the one who can't address the topic without resorting to insults.

[cthomer5000]

TCU escaped last night... could that final play have been any more heartbreaking for Lousiville?

For those who didn't see the game. It was 31-28 (TCU leading) and Lousiville kicking the tying field goal from about 42-45 yards. The kick was looking good, and then bounced off the crossbar and fell short. Could not have been any closer, and was a dramatic finish to a great game.

I don't know why I care, but I'm really rooting for the Horned Frogs to sneak into a BCS game. Of course if they do manage it, they'll be carrying the collective hope and credibility of the small conferences on their shoulders. They'd better deliver!