11-17-2005, 04:00 PM | #1 | |||
High School Varsity
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
T.O. Article on Fox: Q for attorney types
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5086966
In the article the author writes: Quote:
Anyone know whether this is bargained for in the NFLPA CBA with the league, or is this the default under the NLRA? I do labor arbitrations for a local union and I have a case where the (potential) grievant was fired but does not want to file a grievance. It is important to the Union that we establish that someone can not be fired for the reason this person was fired (off duty conduct). The Employer is arguing that I can't take a grievance to arbitration without the grievant and I am arguing that the right to grieve is a collective right of the Union and not an individual right. Anyone here have any experience with this sort of thing? |
|||
11-17-2005, 04:06 PM | #2 |
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
I don't have any experience with this, so I can't answer your question, but I would assume that this is either bargained for or perhaps established in case law for the very reason you need it - because a departed employee may not have an interest in the outcome of a matter that the union will have to live with.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|