Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Off Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2016, 03:39 PM   #851
Thomkal
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
kinda already talked about here, but Josh Norman did try and sign his franchise tender after Carolina rescinded it. Maybe next time his contract is up, he'll pay more attention to what his agent is doing:

Josh Norman offered to sign Carolina Panthers’ franchise tag

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/15...s-rescinded-it

Last edited by Thomkal : 04-25-2016 at 03:44 PM.
Thomkal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 04:21 PM   #852
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Tough to make the argument that he should change anything after he more than tripled his guaranteed money.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 06:33 AM   #853
SteveMax58
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Didn't see anything about this posted....

Agent: Sam Bradford wants to be where 'he's the man' - NFL.com

Bradford is becoming one of the douchiest players I can recall in recent memory. A guy that has been overpaid grossly compared to his actual play on the field (when he's not injured) and should really just shut his mouth. He should be happy to play as well as he can and understand that his lack of being on the field is his biggest question mark. And that nobody will feel secure about having him as their QB without a good backup plan.

Much as I enjoy turmoil in Philly (as a Giants fan), I have to say I hope they cut him and he sits out a year because of no takers.
SteveMax58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 06:50 AM   #854
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Yeah, seriously fuck Bradford. He was lucky enough to be drafted #1 overall in an era where the top guys in the draft got paid an absolute shit ton of money. He did nothing to reward that contract with anything but mediocre play and injury. He somehow turned that into a starting job under Chip Kelly, where he was again mediocre and probably played a decent part in getting the guy fired. And now he's butthurt that that team doesn't feel like he's the long term solution and traded up to get a QB? How about you buckle down and show Philly why they were wrong and earn that next contract? He's still going to be a starter this year which is possibly more than he deserves.

Wouldn't want my team to go anywhere near him. Would love to see Philly cut him and him end up signing a one year deal to back up somewhere. Off you go son.
bhlloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 06:52 AM   #855
Butter
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
He was the man in St. Louis for 5 years, and they were never good in any of those years. Most QBs don't even get that much time, but he did. He's lucky his career isn't over.
__________________
My listening habits
Butter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 07:26 AM   #856
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Yep. He should be thankful he has a job at all. Much less one with a huge signing bonus.
__________________
Author of The Bill Gates Challenge, as well as other groundbreaking dynasties.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 06:27 PM   #858
Dutch
"Dutch"
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
I'm starting to see why he wants out. If he isn't the man, why keep him? Leadership at that position is important and with a QBOTF on the bench, he probably won't command much respect. It's a better role for an aging vet than a guy like Bradford anyway.

Last edited by Dutch : 04-26-2016 at 06:27 PM.
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 07:15 PM   #859
TroyF
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
I'm starting to see why he wants out. If he isn't the man, why keep him? Leadership at that position is important and with a QBOTF on the bench, he probably won't command much respect. It's a better role for an aging vet than a guy like Bradford anyway.


i don't get the hate on Bradford at all. he signed a contract with the presumption he was going to be the starter with a chance to be there long term. The Eagles decided two weeks later that wasn't the case.

I don't care what Bradford did before this. He doesn't want to be a lame duck QB and I don't blame him a bit for it. Everyone says "just perform and you'll get traded" He had a chance to go wherever he wanted before signing with the Eagles.

Everyone acts like because he's made all this money, he should just be thrilled that the Eagles did this to him. As someone who was hired for a job and then had them change the rules on me, I know what it feels like.

What's beyond stupid here is how Bradford is getting the hate and nobody is ripping the Eagles. They jettison Kelly and one of the big reasons why is that they said he didn't communicate with players and that wasn't the way Luria wanted it. They proceed to sign a 7 million dollar backup QB, resign their starter to a decent deal and then trade up to draft a QB? Seriously?

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but why in the hell is this team planning on spending 32 million dollars on 3 QB's this year? Their plan was that Bradford would just be thankful he had a job, perform well and they could recoup some of the draft picks they traded to get the #2 pick. Their problem is they never bothered telling Bradford of their master plan and it pissed him off.

This isn't me defending Bradford and saying he's a hall of fame QB. Hell, I'm not even saying he's a capable QB. (though I think he is) The fact is the guy was blindsided by a team with a different agenda than he had. Had he known their master plan, he would have had the chance to accept it or move on.

As of now, he gets the "reward" of going to lead a bad team and will get blamed for whatever start he leads them to. If it's 2-6, it's time for Wentz. If it's 4-4, they should have been 6-2, put in Wentz. Yeah, it's a blast being a lame duck for a team that doesn't want you. He should be jumping for joy at this.
TroyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 07:22 PM   #860
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroyF View Post
He should be jumping for joy at this.

That anyone is willing to pay his brittle ass a nickel, yeah, pretty much.

I loathe Matt Ryan, I don't think he could lead starving dogs to fresh meat ... but I'd take him for 5 years over Bradford for half a season.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 08:25 PM   #861
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroyF View Post
i don't get the hate on Bradford at all. he signed a contract with the presumption he was going to be the starter with a chance to be there long term. The Eagles decided two weeks later that wasn't the case.

I don't care what Bradford did before this. He doesn't want to be a lame duck QB and I don't blame him a bit for it. Everyone says "just perform and you'll get traded" He had a chance to go wherever he wanted before signing with the Eagles.

Everyone acts like because he's made all this money, he should just be thrilled that the Eagles did this to him. As someone who was hired for a job and then had them change the rules on me, I know what it feels like.

What's beyond stupid here is how Bradford is getting the hate and nobody is ripping the Eagles. They jettison Kelly and one of the big reasons why is that they said he didn't communicate with players and that wasn't the way Luria wanted it. They proceed to sign a 7 million dollar backup QB, resign their starter to a decent deal and then trade up to draft a QB? Seriously?

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but why in the hell is this team planning on spending 32 million dollars on 3 QB's this year? Their plan was that Bradford would just be thankful he had a job, perform well and they could recoup some of the draft picks they traded to get the #2 pick. Their problem is they never bothered telling Bradford of their master plan and it pissed him off.

This isn't me defending Bradford and saying he's a hall of fame QB. Hell, I'm not even saying he's a capable QB. (though I think he is) The fact is the guy was blindsided by a team with a different agenda than he had. Had he known their master plan, he would have had the chance to accept it or move on.

As of now, he gets the "reward" of going to lead a bad team and will get blamed for whatever start he leads them to. If it's 2-6, it's time for Wentz. If it's 4-4, they should have been 6-2, put in Wentz. Yeah, it's a blast being a lame duck for a team that doesn't want you. He should be jumping for joy at this.

That's what sports is. Did Favre act like a teenage girl that got stood up for the prom when they drafted Rodgers? That's the difference between a leader and Bradford.

If he thought there was long term potential, he was a fool. The team doesn't sign him for only 2 years if they actually had long term plans for him.

He should try making it through an entire season before he acts like he is entitled.

He had a perfect chance to prove himself to be a leader and he blew it. If he rallied the team around him and led them anywhere close to the post season he would have improved his bargaining position.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 09:27 PM   #862
Dutch
"Dutch"
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
Fabre was in his 14th season and the Pack selected Rodgers at 1.24. Which goes to my point that it works better with an aging vet versus a younger guy trying to make a name for himself.

This was completely expected.
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 07:07 AM   #863
flere-imsaho
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Relevant:


flere-imsaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 07:21 AM   #864
Butter
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroyF View Post
i don't get the hate on Bradford at all. he signed a contract with the presumption he was going to be the starter with a chance to be there long term.

A 2 year contract = long-term starter?

If he made that presumption based on his track record, he's a doofus.
__________________
My listening habits

Last edited by Butter : 04-27-2016 at 07:22 AM.
Butter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 09:07 AM   #865
TroyF
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
That's what sports is. Did Favre act like a teenage girl that got stood up for the prom when they drafted Rodgers? That's the difference between a leader and Bradford.

If he thought there was long term potential, he was a fool. The team doesn't sign him for only 2 years if they actually had long term plans for him.

He should try making it through an entire season before he acts like he is entitled.

He had a perfect chance to prove himself to be a leader and he blew it. If he rallied the team around him and led them anywhere close to the post season he would have improved his bargaining position.


If you see ANY similarity between Bradford and Favre, I pray for you.

Again, I think people are missing the point. He was told one thing and switched to another after he signed his deal. There isn't a single person here who would be happy with that if it happened with their personal job. Not one of you.

Everyone is trying to make this about how good Bradford is. I don't care how good he is. That part is irrelevant in this situation to me. The Eagles should have been upfront about their plans. After he signed the contract, Bradford was stating how excited he was and that he wanted to stay in Philly for a long time. That's the talk of a guy who has been told "Have a good year this year and you are the guy long term" not the talk of a guy who is going to lose his starting job in 8 weeks if he's playing at anything less than Tom Brady level football.

And I'm not saying we should all cry for Sam because he's a poor, broke kid who lost a chance at his big contract. No. . . I'm saying he was misled (of that I'm almost 100% certain) and then had the rug pulled out from under him within a month of signing the contract. That's garbage. Hell, the guy went to Oklahoma University. Most of the time I'd be thrilled if horrible things happened to any player who went there. Just not this time. The Eagles should have been honest with him. Sorry, they just should have.
TroyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 09:18 AM   #866
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroyF View Post
If you see ANY similarity between Bradford and Favre, I pray for you.

Again, I think people are missing the point. He was told one thing and switched to another after he signed his deal. There isn't a single person here who would be happy with that if it happened with their personal job. Not one of you.

Everyone is trying to make this about how good Bradford is. I don't care how good he is. That part is irrelevant in this situation to me. The Eagles should have been upfront about their plans. After he signed the contract, Bradford was stating how excited he was and that he wanted to stay in Philly for a long time. That's the talk of a guy who has been told "Have a good year this year and you are the guy long term" not the talk of a guy who is going to lose his starting job in 8 weeks if he's playing at anything less than Tom Brady level football.

And I'm not saying we should all cry for Sam because he's a poor, broke kid who lost a chance at his big contract. No. . . I'm saying he was misled (of that I'm almost 100% certain) and then had the rug pulled out from under him within a month of signing the contract. That's garbage. Hell, the guy went to Oklahoma University. Most of the time I'd be thrilled if horrible things happened to any player who went there. Just not this time. The Eagles should have been honest with him. Sorry, they just should have.

I'm not really on any side of this, but I think you might be overstating how disingenuous the Eagles may have been here. They gave him a 2 year deal which isn't much of an indication that he was in their long term plans, especially when it was structured with a $4MM roster bonus due in March next year.

Where did you come up with "anything less than Brady performance" and he's gone after 8 weeks?
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 09:23 AM   #867
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
I agree with troy.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 09:44 AM   #868
vex
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tulsa
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevew View Post
I agree with troy.

+1
vex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 10:09 AM   #869
CU Tiger
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Backwoods, SC
+1

And even a touch further. Everything given up to acquire QB could have been used to acquire weapons to surround him with. Now he is a lame duck QB, with limited playmakers and he is playing for a career. Make no mistake if he flames out in Philly he will be out of the league. I think that is his main point of contention.
CU Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 10:39 AM   #870
NobodyHere
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
Fabre was in his 14th season and the Pack selected Rodgers at 1.24. Which goes to my point that it works better with an aging vet versus a younger guy trying to make a name for himself.

This was completely expected.

A think Bradford's situation is more comparable to Drew Brees/ Philip Rivers.

I don't recall Brees whining when Rivers got drafted (well technically traded for) but he did go out and win.
__________________
"I am God's prophet, and I need an attorney"
NobodyHere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 11:22 AM   #871
Arles
Grey Dog Software
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
I'm still trying to figure out why people think Bradford is a legit #1 starter. He's had 5 seasons and has just one full season with a rating over 83 (86.4 last season). His 16 game averages are:

3700 yards, 60% completion, 6.45 ypa, 19 TDs, 13 INT and a rating of 81.0.

Here are 16 start averages for some other QBS:

3600 yards, 58% completion, 7.17 ypa, 19 TDs, 14 INT and a rating of 82.2.
3668 yards, 60% completion, 7.16 ypa, 22 TDs, 11 INT and a rating of 87.3.
3550 yards, 60% completion, 6.70 ypa, 23 TDs, 17 INT and a rating of 81.0.
3850 yards, 60% completion, 6.75 ypa, 20 TDs, 16 INT and a rating of 80.1.

The 4 QBs are Brian Hoyer, Nick Foles, Ryan Fitzpatrick and Josh McCown. I don't think the agents of any of these four would be outraged if their teams signed a young QB. Actually, all four QBs have been on teams who drafted a young QB and none said a peep. If Bradford hadn't been signed for all the money he got from St. Louis (last year before the new CBA), he would have been bouncing around as a backup/bottom tier starter like McCown or Hoyer the last few seasons. He can't even hit the high points from Fitzpatrick or Foles in their best seasons. Fitzpatrick has had a 90 QB rating and over 30 TDs and Foles had his 27 TD, 119 rating season. Bradford's "best" season was 19 TDs and a rating of 86.4.
__________________
Developer of Bowl Bound College Football
http://www.greydogsoftware.com

Last edited by Arles : 04-27-2016 at 11:33 AM.
Arles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 11:31 AM   #872
SteveMax58
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan View Post
I'm not really on any side of this, but I think you might be overstating how disingenuous the Eagles may have been here. They gave him a 2 year deal which isn't much of an indication that he was in their long term plans, especially when it was structured with a $4MM roster bonus due in March next year.

Where did you come up with "anything less than Brady performance" and he's gone after 8 weeks?

Yeah this...and a couple more points to consider.

Far beit for me to defend the Eagles....but who's to say the Eagles had any clue they could land a deal for the #2 pick when they resigned Bradford? I don't think they would have paid him anywhere close to $18m/Yr if they expected that to be a possibility. Opportunity presents itself and a franchise ought to do what's believed to be in their interest. Whether it actually is, remains to be seen, but (presumably) Wentz is expected to need more time to develop anyway. Plenty of time for Bradford to make his claim on qb of the future....whether it be in Philly or elsewhere.

Also, Bradford's lack of top caliber play is highly relevant here. Sorry....you aren't Tom Brady, Drew Brees, or any other face of a franchise with a reliable injury history and on field consistency. You had that shot, it didn't work out, so now you're given a 2 yr deal....at nearly Brady money. What more could you possibly expect?

I'm not saying Bradford should be thrilled about this, nor would I in a similar situation. Not at all. But I also wouldn't expect a franchise to put all their eggs in my basket when my basket has never produced a dam thing. And to not realize all of these things....makes me question Bradford's emotional and intellectual durability...to go along with his physical durability questions.
SteveMax58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 11:36 AM   #873
SteveMax58
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arles View Post
I'm still trying to figure out why people think Bradford is a legit #1 starter.

The worst part might be that HE actually thinks he's done anything to warrant that type of treatment.
SteveMax58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 02:39 PM   #874
RedKingGold
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
3 49ers predictions for the draft:

(1) They take LB Leonard Floyd from Georgia at #7 overall. Ballke loves edge rushers, recall he took Aldon Smith over Blaine Gabbert in 2011, and Floyd as the type of athleticism and potential identified in Smith. I'm somewhat surprised no one notable has mocked Floyd to SF to date.

(2) They trade Kaepernick to Denver before Friday's round concludes.

(3) They don't take a QB until Day 3.
RedKingGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 05:47 PM   #875
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMax58 View Post
The worst part might be that HE actually thinks he's done anything to warrant that type of treatment.

This.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 05:49 PM   #876
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
dola: I couldn't care less if he is upset about it; but acting like a spoiled brat is where things really go south. He needed to cowboy up and put on his big boy pants. How many players in the league are going to be happy if he ends up on their team at this point (except for second level quarterbacks who want to have a chance to start)?
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 07:38 PM   #877
Abe Sargent
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
So take my Jags. Two years ago, great defense, 5th in league in sacks, a huge pro-bowl year for new signee Sen derrick Marks, and horrible offense, starting recently drafted rookies like Bortles and Robinson.

Last year, the offense really clicked with the addition of TE Julius Thomas to the mix and the growth of Bortles and the Allens.

But the defense was older, and there were only a few players of real quality here, like LB Telvin Smith. You also had the star and top rookie pick out for the year with an injury. Marks was injured, as was LB Paul Poz.


Go out in FA and sign one of the best S in Gipson, sign arguably teh best defensive FA in Malik Jackson, and bring in CB Prince Amakamara, often injured on a one year prove-it deal to see if he can bring it.

Bring back no longer injured DE Dante Fowler to the team. Bring back a healthy Marks, who is two years removed from a year where he led DTs in sacks.

Now add in rookies Myles Jack and Jalen Ramsey to the mix.

Go along players like SS Cyprien, CB Davon House, and LB Telvin Smith

Holy crap. That's a good defense. Layer around in players like CB Colvin, DE Alualu, the leader Paul Poz, and more.

That's got the potential to be a smothering defense.

I'm just saying. Go JAGS!
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns!

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

Last edited by Abe Sargent : 04-29-2016 at 07:40 PM.
Abe Sargent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 08:40 PM   #878
Suicane75
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
Feel good for ya Abe, Jags are shaping up to be a fun team to be a fan of.
Suicane75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 09:47 PM   #879
Abe Sargent
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
Thanks!
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns!

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent
Abe Sargent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 10:03 PM   #880
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abe Sargent View Post
So take my Jags. Two years ago, great defense, 5th in league in sacks, a huge pro-bowl year for new signee Sen derrick Marks, and horrible offense, starting recently drafted rookies like Bortles and Robinson.

Last year, the offense really clicked with the addition of TE Julius Thomas to the mix and the growth of Bortles and the Allens.

But the defense was older, and there were only a few players of real quality here, like LB Telvin Smith. You also had the star and top rookie pick out for the year with an injury. Marks was injured, as was LB Paul Poz.


Go out in FA and sign one of the best S in Gipson, sign arguably teh best defensive FA in Malik Jackson, and bring in CB Prince Amakamara, often injured on a one year prove-it deal to see if he can bring it.

Bring back no longer injured DE Dante Fowler to the team. Bring back a healthy Marks, who is two years removed from a year where he led DTs in sacks.

Now add in rookies Myles Jack and Jalen Ramsey to the mix.

Go along players like SS Cyprien, CB Davon House, and LB Telvin Smith

Holy crap. That's a good defense. Layer around in players like CB Colvin, DE Alualu, the leader Paul Poz, and more.

That's got the potential to be a smothering defense.

I'm just saying. Go JAGS!

London's getting a pretty good team...

Seriously though, that could be their division this year. If the Colts can rebound it could at least be a good race; but I suspect the Colts will struggle.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 10:03 PM   #881
JAG
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: St. Paul, MN
My six year old daughter (more or less inexplicably) became a Jags fan this past year, so she was excited when I told her I thought they had a good chance to have a great year. Huge talent infusion defensively and the offense was already starting to look dangerous at times last year.
JAG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 10:14 PM   #882
jbergey22
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
It is the NFL if Bradford plays well he will keep the damn job. He is being a baby cause he must realize he sucks and will get beat out by a rookie.

Why would Bradford feel entitled to get the job and have no competition? The guy has proved nothing in the NFL except he can get hurt and throw ints as good as any starting QB in the league.

Bradford should spend less time complaining and more time working on his game.
jbergey22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 10:16 PM   #883
jbergey22
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abe Sargent View Post
So take my Jags. Two years ago, great defense, 5th in league in sacks, a huge pro-bowl year for new signee Sen derrick Marks, and horrible offense, starting recently drafted rookies like Bortles and Robinson.

Last year, the offense really clicked with the addition of TE Julius Thomas to the mix and the growth of Bortles and the Allens.

But the defense was older, and there were only a few players of real quality here, like LB Telvin Smith. You also had the star and top rookie pick out for the year with an injury. Marks was injured, as was LB Paul Poz.


Go out in FA and sign one of the best S in Gipson, sign arguably teh best defensive FA in Malik Jackson, and bring in CB Prince Amakamara, often injured on a one year prove-it deal to see if he can bring it.

Bring back no longer injured DE Dante Fowler to the team. Bring back a healthy Marks, who is two years removed from a year where he led DTs in sacks.

Now add in rookies Myles Jack and Jalen Ramsey to the mix.

Go along players like SS Cyprien, CB Davon House, and LB Telvin Smith

Holy crap. That's a good defense. Layer around in players like CB Colvin, DE Alualu, the leader Paul Poz, and more.

That's got the potential to be a smothering defense.

I'm just saying. Go JAGS!

This seems like such a nice draft. Things are falling into place for them and they arent out thinking themselves.
jbergey22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2016, 04:37 AM   #884
AlexB
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newbury, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicane75 View Post
Feel good for ya Abe, Jags are shaping up to be a fun team to be a fan of.

Excited too - the rookies should have acclimatised to the demands of the NFL by the time the franchise comes over to London

Edit - EagleFan beat me to it
__________________
'A song is a beautiful lie', Idlewild, Self Healer.
When you're smiling, the whole world smiles with you.
Sports!

Last edited by AlexB : 04-30-2016 at 04:38 AM.
AlexB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2016, 07:24 PM   #885
Thomkal
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
Hoyer signs one year deal with the Bears.
Thomkal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2016, 07:45 PM   #886
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
That's an interesting one, but I suppose if you are looking at a list of teams where you are a terrible starter away from playing a lot the Bears would be high on the list, and Cutler isn't massively durable either.

Still not sure what the Jets plans are if their game of Fitzpatrick roulette doesn't go well. Are they seriously planning to start Geno Smith?
bhlloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2016, 08:16 PM   #887
Abe Sargent
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhlloy View Post
That's an interesting one, but I suppose if you are looking at a list of teams where you are a terrible starter away from playing a lot the Bears would be high on the list, and Cutler isn't massively durable either.

Still not sure what the Jets plans are if their game of Fitzpatrick roulette doesn't go well. Are they seriously planning to start Geno Smith?

We all know Fitx will start...
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns!

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent
Abe Sargent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2016, 08:18 PM   #888
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
They have to sign him first
bhlloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2016, 08:18 PM   #889
Abe Sargent
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
That was my point. It'ss happen
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns!

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent
Abe Sargent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2016, 08:02 PM   #890
BillJasper
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern Kentucky
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbergey22 View Post
It is the NFL if Bradford plays well he will keep the damn job. He is being a baby cause he must realize he sucks and will get beat out by a rookie.

Why would Bradford feel entitled to get the job and have no competition? The guy has proved nothing in the NFL except he can get hurt and throw ints as good as any starting QB in the league.

Bradford should spend less time complaining and more time working on his game.

Bradford gets shoved aside as soon as they feel Wentz is ready. The Eagles have too much invested in Wentz.
__________________
The Confederacy lost, it is time to dismantle it.
BillJasper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 07:54 AM   #891
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
This story is awful. I was an enormous fan of Stubblefield and Bryant Young on that team.

Former NFL Star Dana Stubblefield Charged With Raping A Developmentally Disabled Woman
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 10:55 AM   #892
TroyF
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillJasper View Post
Bradford gets shoved aside as soon as they feel Wentz is ready. The Eagles have too much invested in Wentz.


Exactly. I said earlier in the thread, Bradford can play like Brady and it simply doesn't matter. He's gone. He won't play like Brady. I think a lot of people here are focusing on what type of QB I think he is. I don't care what type of QB he is in this, that part is irrelevant to me. What I know is that he had a chance to go to multiple teams this offseason. Denver would have taken him over Sanchez in a milisecond.

He decided not to go that route because he believed the Eagles were going to give him a chance to be the long term guy. (that was my belief when this started and nothing I've heard since has changed that) Instead of having a "chance" to be the long term guy, he's now a lame duck. The Philly eggs are in the Wentz basket now. (and again, that is probably better for them in the future. I don't give a damn about how good you think the QB's are here)

Philly's plan was to make this trade, start Bradford and hope he played like the end of last year and then use him to recover some of the picks they traded for Wentz. That's fine and all, but if that was their plan they probably should have conveyed that to Bradford.

I keep hearing how Bradfor is too scared to compete. Bull. They signed Daniel to a fairly large contract and brought in his position coach to be the head coach. No matter what Philly was saying, this was going to be a competition had they not drafted a QB. Bradford's issue is that he thought he had the CHANCE to be the long term QB of the Eagles and that chance went bye bye with the trade.

He feels like they screwed him and I'm inclined to agree.

Now he plays terrific, they'll still trade him (to a team he won't be able to choose). He plays decent, it'll be portrayed that he's horrible in the Philly media because the Wentz countdown clock is already ticking in their minds. Bradford is now in a bad situation and he's there because the Eagles lied to him.

And to think. . . this is the organization who fired Kelly because he couldn't communicate with players correctly.
TroyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 08:51 PM   #893
Abe Sargent
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
Man I just love telvin Smith so much.


Jaguars' Telvin Smith calls players-only meeting, says no to settling - Jacksonville Jaguars Blog- ESPN
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns!

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent
Abe Sargent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2016, 07:06 PM   #894
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
Sigh, try #3-
Claussen draft eval.

Spoiler


https://imgur.com/gallery/ivp1i some other draft evaluations by the raiders.

Last edited by stevew : 05-12-2016 at 07:07 PM.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2016, 08:14 PM   #895
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Good at throwing deep, outside of his lack of arm strength.

Might be an asshole. But could capture the clubhouse!

Can escape the pocket. Except when he can't!

Has a herky-jerky motion, which results in multiple arm deliveries.

Sometimes looks like he doesn't have the natural rhythm, but not most of the time when it's good. This makes him inaccurate, except in the immediate.

WTF, Raiders.
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2016, 11:44 PM   #896
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
As someone who watched most of Jimmy Clausen's starts at ND, that was a pretty accurate scouting report. He was very, very good and accurate, except when he was not! (Snark aside, for all of Weis' supposed tactical genius, our offense was basically lob jump balls/fades to Golden Tate, Michael Floyd, and Kyle Rudolph... which obviously worked pretty well for a college team. But makes it kind of hard to read if a quarterback can go through progressions, or if those were bad throws to a covered guy or good throws to a great guy against an overmatched DB.)
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2016, 08:22 AM   #897
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Claussen NFL eval:

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuikSand View Post
But for crying out loud, you don't decide you're set at QB because you have pocket lint like Jimmy Claussen already on hand.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2016, 10:11 AM   #898
albionmoonlight
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Following an NFL team in an area with a passionate college football fanbase is amusing.

There's a thread on the Saints' message board right now about how the team would be foolish not to sign . . . Zack Mettenberger.
albionmoonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2016, 11:45 AM   #899
Dutch
"Dutch"
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by albionmoonlight View Post
Following an NFL team in an area with a passionate college football fanbase is amusing.

There's a thread on the Saints' message board right now about how the team would be foolish not to sign . . . Zack Mettenberger.

Tampa went through the same thing with Tebow. Mettenburger-Mania! Hahaha
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2016, 12:53 PM   #900
lungs
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Prairie du Sac, WI
Around here the rumor was that the Patriots would take Joel Stave in the third round. :0
lungs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.