11-17-2008, 02:27 PM | #51 | ||
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
dola- for now. Hoops' post could be a way to try and gain trust by saying he was willing to go down early.
|
||
11-17-2008, 02:31 PM | #52 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
I think it is a poor decision for them to throw a red herring in, as the smart move for the villagers then would be to focus on an even smaller group of players that are all either non-rolled villagers or wolves. The other group that contains the seer can help find out which of those four are lying. |
|
11-17-2008, 02:34 PM | #53 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
|
Quote:
Yeah but they're kind of forced. I mean if the reveal happens and we have a bucket of 3 cleared, un-contested roled villagers in one pile and the other pile is 9 people where all the wolves are and that we at worst have a 1/3rds chance off the bat of clearing people, it's Game Over. Even if we miss, with a Seer scan we can clear someone or get a wolf and now it's just about to the point where we'll have a really good idea on the wolves. Anyhow, since Lathum is apparently out of the bag, I'll go ahead and state, I do have a role. If someone needs me to say which role, I'll entertain that idea. |
|
11-17-2008, 02:39 PM | #54 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
I wouldnt go crazy about the fact I revealed, how often in a game with the Duke role do we make it past the second day NOT knowing who they are?
|
11-17-2008, 02:43 PM | #55 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
I think mathematically though the reveal hurts the wolves no matter which way they go. That is the point of the percentages. I think that play if they chose to do so might make it more likely for us to kill a non-rolled villager on day 1, but it would also make it far easier to find one of them for sure, and still wouldn't help them keep the groups apart seperated really as they still would have the remainder wolves in that small group anyhows. I don't really think the move you talk about there is as much of a curve ball as you think it does. But that said, maybe I'm wrong... and they will try it. I wouldn't mind that. |
|
11-17-2008, 02:43 PM | #56 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
|
Oh I agree, just saying that since we're partway there...
|
11-17-2008, 02:44 PM | #57 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
|
Quote:
It's not a big curveball, but it does create an interesting scenario for the village. I'd agree that the village *should* go for the non-roled group still, but I thought that last game as well and they didn't (and happened to get me with some revealing of actual roles after I was gone) |
|
11-17-2008, 02:47 PM | #58 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
If I'm going to go out on D1 I would rather you not Duke me to do it. I would still rather not go down on D1, all things being equal. I just think it would be worse overall to lose villager + Duke power in same cycle. Particularly if no one is challenging you as Duke ... if that is still the case by the start of N1 then I'm (assuming I'm still alive) going to work with the idea that you are the Duke and would probably encourage everyone else to do the same. |
|
11-17-2008, 02:49 PM | #59 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
FWIW, the village did vote into the "villager" pile on D1 last game. I just went against it with my Duke decision at the end of the day. |
|
11-17-2008, 03:02 PM | #60 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
|
Quote:
True, I forgot about that. Mainly because I knew I was dead and ceased caring. |
|
11-17-2008, 03:39 PM | #61 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
Quite a few, I think. So are you going to duke somebody today? I'm trying to figure out my vote.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
11-17-2008, 03:46 PM | #62 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
I doubt I will duke anyone today.
|
11-17-2008, 03:47 PM | #63 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Vote Hoopsguy
|
11-17-2008, 04:26 PM | #64 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
OK then. I don't see any good reason to come out as the duke and not prove that ability and risk getting killed without using it, so despite the risk of doing so: VOTE LATHUM
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
11-17-2008, 04:31 PM | #65 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
*ponder ponder ponder*
|
11-17-2008, 04:32 PM | #66 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
I don't like this vote at all. The Duke isn't really one of those roles that people tend to fake-reveal as. The sentence for that is usually not a very good one. His getting that information out also should likely be viewed as trusted unless it is disputed by someone else. If that ends up being the case, the duke and fake duke can have a duke-off and settle that real quick. Your vote here makes very little sense to me.. plus since you aren't one of the revealed roles, the worst mistake I make here is voting off an ordinary villager. Vote Path |
|
11-17-2008, 04:44 PM | #68 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Has everyone checked in and caught up yet? because I'm rather stumped as to why Lathum would reveal the actual role he has if he were NOT that role. its a lose lose move.
|
11-17-2008, 04:46 PM | #69 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
Why does he have to use his power now? There is nothing that says he should use his power right now. Do you honestly think that a wolf is going to fake reveal as the duke? Why on earth would he do that? |
|
11-17-2008, 04:47 PM | #70 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
|
I agree that Lathum doesn't *have* to Duke someone and is likely the Duke.
I don't quite see it though as an indictment on path |
11-17-2008, 04:47 PM | #71 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
this screams set up move to me. I can easily see a scenerio where Path fake reveals as the Duke later in the game and points to this post. UNVOTE HOOPSGUY VOTE PATH |
|
11-17-2008, 04:47 PM | #72 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
|
I'm going off the map
Vote TheJackal He's playing, right? |
11-17-2008, 04:50 PM | #73 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
exactly, plus what do I gain from using it today. I would much rather save the ability for when there is some actual info on the players. Especialy in a game where a lynch isn't guarenteed to be the player with the most votes. Right now there are 11 unknowns in this game to me so why duke someone when it really doesn't matter who gets killed? |
|
11-17-2008, 04:51 PM | #74 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
I feel there is no good reason for him to push that vote there (as if he was the real duke he would just attempt to duke Lathum instead). The way he framed it feels to me more like a case of trying to subtly push the vote away from the voting pool that we tried to narrow earlier in our afternoon discussions. I felt there was virtually 0 upside for his vote in a villager point of view and only bad reasons for it. |
|
11-17-2008, 04:51 PM | #75 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
I think due to the random factor we all need to vote Path. I have an uncontested reveal as a villager role and he still voted for me.
Not in out best interest. |
11-17-2008, 04:57 PM | #76 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
I would like to see Path get more votes, but if he doesn't I will probably duke to him.
Thoughts? |
11-17-2008, 05:00 PM | #77 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
I think part of the point of a narrowed voting pool is there are less chances to be wrong on a day 1 vote than normal. So of interest to me is seeing who ends up being right and wrong when we nail our first wolf. Whether that is today, tommorrow, day 3 or whatever. I think because of the percentages aspect of this game, a wolf might be a bit less likely to throw a random vote on another wolf (and risk even a small chance of their death). So I think I'd rather just leave it as you aren't going to duke path or anyone else today.. and then when you feel the time is right (whether today or tommorrow or whenever) you use it as you feel. By claiming you are going to duke him anyways, it will possibly cause people to vote differently then they might have otherwise. |
|
11-17-2008, 05:00 PM | #78 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
|
I dunno, this whole thing screams villager/villager to me.
|
11-17-2008, 05:03 PM | #79 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Maybe you are right. The way Path did it gives my gut a huge wolf feeling however. My gut seems to be rather hit or miss on these things though, so by all means I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything here. I'm just explaining what I feel and why my vote is going there today. Anyhows, I'm heading out for a bit. I'll be back later before deadline though. |
11-17-2008, 05:22 PM | #80 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
The only scenario I see for a fake Duke reveal is if Pass provided the bad guys with a list of the roles in the game and Duke wasn't on the list. I don't view this as likely. I'm going to need to cast my vote in about 30 minutes and have no clue where I'm going to put it.
|
11-17-2008, 05:24 PM | #81 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
|
Lathum is 40% likely to be the night kill if the other roles are not revealed, unless the wolves feel like they have a good handle on him and are willing to risk him using his ability in place of the vote. This argues for him using his ability today. Whether or not he decides to be up-front with us about that in the thread is entirely at his discretion.
However, I do think that he can use his role as a bully pulpit to move the vote today. That is only enhanced as more people show up and do not counter his reveal. He becomes a "de facto trusted" villager, and if you do not know who to trust then why not follow the leader? Or, at the very least, engage the "known good" in discussion in the thread. |
11-17-2008, 05:24 PM | #82 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
My only point is why come out as the duke and then risk getting killed without using your power? Then he gets killed tonight and the role doesn't help us in the least. As to your point about someone else disputing the role, I don't agree with your premise. Let's say that for whatever reason Lathum is fake revealing -- the real duke doesn't have to say anything in thread, just duke the vote to him tonight and problem solved. But for the record, it makes no sense for him to fake reveal as the duke and I do believe him. I'm just trying to get him to use the power now that he's put it out there.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
11-17-2008, 05:25 PM | #83 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
|
Lathum, do you feel strongly enough about Path as a candidate that you would prefer a runaway vote on him or do you just want him as one of the top candidates and let the random number generator decide between a pair of candidates?
|
11-17-2008, 05:27 PM | #84 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
As I said, I believe you are the duke. I just think it's not a good move to say that and not use the power. You won't get a fake reveal from me, I'm non-roled -- you know I wouldn't make a stand like this day 1 if I wasn't villager.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
11-17-2008, 05:29 PM | #85 | |
High School JV
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Quote:
Also most Dukes would like having votes on them, since that is the only way they can use their power, also they are the only one who KNOWs they are good, so they have better odds than anyone else of pickin off a wolf. |
|
11-17-2008, 05:32 PM | #86 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
Hell, I don't care if you duke it to me though it won't help anything. As I just mentioned last post, it seems pretty obvious to me that this is a villager play on my part. But you put a 40% chance on yourself being killed tonight without using your power. I disagree with you and Alan that there is upside for the village in that. If someone can convince me differently, I'm more than happy to move the vote.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
11-17-2008, 05:33 PM | #87 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Or villager/duke if you will.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
11-17-2008, 05:43 PM | #88 | |
High School JV
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
11-17-2008, 05:46 PM | #89 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
|
Hmm, I'm going to go after the wolf from last game who has not given his thoughts on the vote this afternoon other than:
* ponder ponder ponder * VOTE RENDER |
11-17-2008, 06:09 PM | #90 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
That is the best point I've seen so far. Though IIRC the bodyguard success is on a percentage too isn't it?
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
11-17-2008, 06:09 PM | #91 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
Lathum isn't the only person to have revealed they have a role so far today. We have two people revealing they have roles. |
|
11-17-2008, 06:12 PM | #92 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
In every game that there is a duke role or a villager night kill role, they more often than not end up killing a fellow good guy anyways. The longer they go without using the power, the better chance at being correct with it. In some games, the only benefit of the duke power is being able to add a auto-trusted member. Here Lathum can do that without having to worry about guessing incorrectly. Sure it is a gamble to wait later to use the power, but honestly in today's vote the math shows that a non-rolled villager has a better chance at guessing correctly on the lynch then a rolled villager (including the duke) does. Since I know 3 people right now who are good, vs the two he knows is good. |
|
11-17-2008, 06:14 PM | #93 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
I don't understand your point here. I know occasionally a duke can only duke the vote if he is up for lynch himself.. but most of the time a duke can simply send in a request to duke player X. I could be wrong, but this game is also like that right? I don't see how having a vote on him changes that or not. |
|
11-17-2008, 06:15 PM | #94 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Yep, and they are both likely 40% at this point in time unless the wolves know something that we don't (one is a bluff). Either way, unless there are three reveals I would expect that Lathum becomes a 40% target for them tonight. |
|
11-17-2008, 06:16 PM | #95 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
I know I am playing catchup on posts Chief Rum style right now.. but as I mentioned earlier.. Lathum isn't the only one to have revealed today. I actually am hoping that the third person will also reveal before too late tonight (not revealing which role, but that they have a role) just in case one of the people are lying we would find out. |
|
11-17-2008, 06:17 PM | #96 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
|
|
11-17-2008, 06:19 PM | #97 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
You probably just crossposted with me, but I was also saying I'll have to be hesitant on the other reveal until the third person reveals myself: Quote:
Since once three people with roles have revealed, if one of them is faking it, someone else will be sitting around thinking.. uhh wait I am a role too so one of them must be lying. Right now you might have two different people thinking that they are the third role and not wanting to reveal that though. |
||
11-17-2008, 06:21 PM | #98 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Back from work and mostly caught up. So, Lathum revealed as the Duke. Did the other two people reveal having a role?
|
11-17-2008, 06:34 PM | #99 |
High School JV
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
|
11-17-2008, 06:45 PM | #100 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
I re-read and we have Lathum as the Duke and Jeheinz as having a role, but no third person yet.
Path's vote seems iffy on Lathum, but for a day one play does seem a little risky for a wolf. That said, I disagree with his comments about Lathum needing to use his Duke. I'd rather him use it with more to go on as right now, it's just throwing a dart blindfolded. For now, I'm probably leaning towards voting elsewhere. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|