WW XCIII - Mine Wars - Battle of Blair Mountain - SYMPATHIZERS WIN!!! - Page 68

claphamsa · 05-11-2009, 06:29 AM

Who all is cleared?

claphamsa · 05-11-2009, 06:29 AM

Adn for what its worth Lathum was on the cleared trusted list, and appears to be a wolf?

Barkeep49 · 05-11-2009, 07:05 AM

What will be of highest importance is figuring out how many camps we think we need to win. The wolves clearly know the answer to that question already. If we can nail how many camps we need to win, I feel pretty good about the game theory that will be required.

PurdueBrad · 05-11-2009, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

What will be of highest importance is figuring out how many camps we think we need to win. The wolves clearly know the answer to that question already. If we can nail how many camps we need to win, I feel pretty good about the game theory that will be required.

BK, I agree 100% with you here. I figure worst case scenario is 3 wolves, but add 1 just in case, make it 4. I think we need to win 4 battles. Knowing that, I think that you can make some good calls here regarding our numbers and hopefully the wolves will shot their load trying to win their number. IF there are 4 wolves, then they need to win the first 3 and we need to be sure that doesn't happen. That's as deep into strategy as I'll go until after their deadline.

Barkeep49 · 05-11-2009, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PurdueBrad

BK, I agree 100% with you here. I figure worst case scenario is 3 wolves, but add 1 just in case, make it 4. I think we need to win 4 battles. Knowing that, I think that you can make some good calls here regarding our numbers and hopefully the wolves will shot their load trying to win their number. IF there are 4 wolves, then they need to win the first 3 and we need to be sure that doesn't happen. That's as deep into strategy as I'll go until after their deadline.

I think this is a case where worst case actually does us a fair amount of harm. I would really love if people, either before or after the sympathizers deadline, give a firm number to this question. I would also really love if people gave a real list, in rank order, of who they'd like to see me delegate to.

PurdueBrad · 05-11-2009, 07:39 AM

Will do BK. I will throw out what I think is a realistic number of wolves and a truly safe number to work from. I assume there are 2 wolves. A safe assumption to work from is 3, meaning we need to win three camps and that should be our goal. The one big advantage we have is that for every camp they lose, that is one more they need to win.

As for my trust list:
1- Danny
2- Heinze
3- GlenGoyne
4- Claphamsa
5- CR
6- RendeR
7- ntndeacon
8- DT

Obviously, no Lathum.

Abe Sargent · 05-11-2009, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny

Abe, after the round is the number of soldiers committed shown or just the winner of the round?

Each side will know the forces the other side committed.

Abe Sargent · 05-11-2009, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glengoyne

The question I have.

Is the miners 12,500 their contingent for the whole battle? Or does it reset every game day?

Whole Battle

DaddyTorgo · 05-11-2009, 07:58 AM

I'd assume 2-3 wolves. Thanks to Lathum for revealing, or we woulda been shot-to-shit there.

My list (FWIW - I know I'm likely near the bottom of most people's so I don't expect it to carry a lot of weight).

1 - DaddyTorgo
2 - Glengoyne
3 - Heinze
4 - Chief Rum (he's got double jobs though, so idk if he'd be a good delegate)
5 - RendeR
6 - Danny
7 - Claphamsa
8 - NTN

jeheinz72 · 05-11-2009, 08:08 AM

Why Glen ahead of me DT?

jeheinz72 · 05-11-2009, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glengoyne

The question I have.

Is the miners 12,500 their contingent for the whole battle? Or does it reset every game day?

Slip of the tongue there Glen?

Abe Sargent · 05-11-2009, 08:11 AM

The term "red-neck" comes from the Battle of Blair Mountain where miners wore red bandannas to identify themselves from the enemy.

claphamsa · 05-11-2009, 08:12 AM

dT you trust PB as little as Lathum? did he reveal as a wolf?

PurdueBrad · 05-11-2009, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

I'd assume 2-3 wolves. Thanks to Lathum for revealing, or we woulda been shot-to-shit there.

My list (FWIW - I know I'm likely near the bottom of most people's so I don't expect it to carry a lot of weight).

1 - DaddyTorgo
2 - Glengoyne
3 - Heinze
4 - Chief Rum (he's got double jobs though, so idk if he'd be a good delegate)
5 - RendeR
6 - Danny
7 - Claphamsa
8 - NTN

Hi DT, I'm playing. Could I at least garner like, I don't know, a #9 rank!?

PurdueBrad · 05-11-2009, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by claphamsa

dT you trust PB as little as Lathum? did he reveal as a wolf?

I am apparently just dead to DT. That sort of hurts.

claphamsa · 05-11-2009, 08:13 AM

0- BK
1 - claphamsa
2 - Glengoyne
3 - NTN
4 - PB
5 - Heinze
6 - Danny
7 - Dadytorgo
8 - RendeR

claphamsa · 05-11-2009, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PurdueBrad

I am apparently just dead to DT. That sort of hurts.

I think he copied your list and didnt add anyone.

PurdueBrad · 05-11-2009, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by claphamsa

I think he copied your list and didnt add anyone.

Makes sense, I just figured we're all (probably even Lathum) going to list ourselves as the top trusted person next to BK so I didn't bother throwing me in there.

Abe Sargent · 05-11-2009, 08:31 AM

Please note, labor, that you can change appointees for different parts of the day.

Barkeep could post "Appoint Abe" and then I run the first Stage, and then I have to go, so I could then post Appoint tanglewood and tanglewood runs Stages 2 and 3 and then might post Appoint Barkeep because BK will be around the next day but not tanglewood, etc.

BK will always be allowed to override whoever is the appointee, because of his role. If Bk appoints Bek, but then does not like what Bek's posted # is, he can override it in a the last few minutes if he wants.

You cannot "unappoint" but you can undo a number to resubmit a new one.

Let's say Bek said:

Use 100,000 soliders

Then decides he wanted to change that to 200,000. He could simply:

UnUse 100,000 soldiers
Use 200k soldiers

That would be fine.

PurdueBrad · 05-11-2009, 08:33 AM

Abe, point of clarification, can BK and his appointee PM each other to discuss strategy in private? This could be a big help so that BK can weed out sympathizers.

TheNorm · 05-11-2009, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abe Sargent

The term "red-neck" comes from the Battle of Blair Mountain where miners wore red bandannas to identify themselves from the enemy.

I had forgotten about that little tidbit of information-thanks!

ntndeacon · 05-11-2009, 08:54 AM

probably not a big surprise, but I did keep one thing to myself....I had a nice rifle hoping that someone would come to see me at night. it was my second as I gave one away early.

claphamsa · 05-11-2009, 09:02 AM

NTN, you gave one away? to who? does it matter anymore? it seems kills are random.....

claphamsa · 05-11-2009, 09:02 AM

has abe let you know of any use for it durign the war?

DaddyTorgo · 05-11-2009, 09:37 AM

whoops! forgot about you PB - i'd put you down there maybe right below danny. i did just copy your list and forgot to add you back in.

as far as glen - given his potential slip of the tongue i'd knock him down a couple pegs there (down 2 maybe)

DaddyTorgo · 05-11-2009, 09:37 AM

why glen over heinzy? that was more of a gut-type thing...i'm fine with heinze.

like i said - my play has been somewhat questionable all game so i doubt BK is going to put a ton of weight into my opinion

DaddyTorgo · 05-11-2009, 09:39 AM

0 - BK
1 - DaddyTorgo
2 - Heinze
3 - Chief Rum (he's got double jobs though, so idk if he'd be a good delegate)
4 - RendeR
5 - Danny
6 - Claphamsa
7 - Glengoyne
8 - PurdueBrad
9 - NTN
10 - Lathum (*BOOO HISSS....VOTE LATHUM!!)

DaddyTorgo · 05-11-2009, 09:41 AM

fuck - ummm...i think i'm arrested and shouldn't be talking?

PurdueBrad · 05-11-2009, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

fuck - ummm...i think i'm arrested and shouldn't be talking?

The wolves can arrest today? Seriously, this game has felt like it has been very skewed in their favor for a while.

What is the value of arresting one of us today?

RendeR · 05-11-2009, 09:46 AM

Well since Abe hasstated that items are useless now I will put my item out there for review.

During the searching mission I discovered a Fiddle that, if a certain circumstance were to happen (loss of moral in a camp, noted by a very specific statement from Abe) then I could play the fiddle and counter the loss in moral by doing so. I'm assuming at this point that a situation simply never came up or had time to with the quickness that the main events happened.

Clap, Why so little trust for me?

Just to help anyone considering me:

I was a searcher with X2 ability, I went on more missions than work and the missions I went on all succeeded as far as I can remember (not slogging through 68 pages of shyte to verify) There was a sympathizer among the searcher-skill people (Jackal) and I would be hard pressed to accept more than one sympathizer in any one specialty just because of the way the game mechanics seem to have run.

Points against me: I've been very quiet since the first couple days and I missed one action/vote night altogether due to reality interjecting itself in the middle of my fantasy time.

Now, lets go kick some Company ass.

ntndeacon · 05-11-2009, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by claphamsa

NTN, you gave one away? to who? does it matter anymore? it seems kills are random.....

I sent it to Poli.

claphamsa · 05-11-2009, 09:57 AM

oh yeah, ok

Abe Sargent · 05-11-2009, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PurdueBrad

Abe, point of clarification, can BK and his appointee PM each other to discuss strategy in private? This could be a big help so that BK can weed out sympathizers.

Um....no? Why would you think to even ask? It's like asking, "Can We Know the Names of the Sympathizers?"

So NO, BK and another may not cheat.

Abe Sargent · 05-11-2009, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

fuck - ummm...i think i'm arrested and shouldn't be talking?

You were arrested for Day Nine and Night Nine, you came back today. You are fine.

PurdueBrad · 05-11-2009, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abe Sargent

Um....no? Why would you think to even ask? It's like asking, "Can We Know the Names of the Sympathizers?"

So NO, BK and another may not cheat.

I guess I was just unclear then on how BK knows what troops his appointee is sending in order to override or is all of that done in thread?

Sorry, didn't mean I wanted us to cheat. Although...

Abe Sargent · 05-11-2009, 10:41 AM

They post publicly here in bold what the troop order is. Easy to coordinate that

Abe Sargent · 05-11-2009, 10:48 AM

I have to be fitted for a Swine Flu mask at 1, which is not supposed to take that long, but just letting you know.

jeheinz72 · 05-11-2009, 10:49 AM

Wait, what?

Barkeep49 · 05-11-2009, 10:53 AM

Ok the sympathizers action should be in. So let's talk numbers. Again it would be helpful if we formed an idea of how many camps we think it takes to win. The idea should be to end the game, win or lose, with as few points as possible.

Barkeep49 · 05-11-2009, 10:54 AM

Also I should not need anyone to take my stead today as I should be around for all 3 deadlines.

RendeR · 05-11-2009, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abe Sargent

I have to be fitted for a Swine Flu mask at 1, which is not supposed to take that long, but just letting you know.

Say what?

Lathum · 05-11-2009, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abe Sargent

I have to be fitted for a Swine Flu mask at 1, which is not supposed to take that long, but just letting you know.

huh?

Lathum · 05-11-2009, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

Ok the sympathizers action should be in. So let's talk numbers. Again it would be helpful if we formed an idea of how many camps we think it takes to win. The idea should be to end the game, win or lose, with as few points as possible.

I suggest using all soldiers early, smash 'em before they can gain any momentum.

What do you think of that Heinze?

RendeR · 05-11-2009, 11:01 AM

assume it takes 4 wins, divide our total by 5, keep 1 5th in reserve to augment things, hit them with 1 fifth today to see how things fall out.

OR

Hammer them today with overwhelming numbers, try to win with a single massive blow, holding a good amount in reserve to play out an attrition game if the first blow fails.

OR

Test the waters with a scouting force first, send it out into the flanks of the company areas to see how strong they are and test their defenses.

Use that information to formulate the next assault using feints and counter moves to flush them into an area where our entire force can surround and eradicate them to the last worthless company scumbag.

RendeR · 05-11-2009, 11:02 AM

Lathum is such a tool.

RendeR · 05-11-2009, 11:02 AM

Barkeep49 · 05-11-2009, 11:05 AM

I don't want to assume 4 wins just because it's the safe thing to do. If we assume 4 and it's 3 we dramatically reduce our chances of winning.

Lathum · 05-11-2009, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RendeR

Hammer them today with overwhelming numbers, try to win with a single massive blow, holding a good amount in reserve to play out an attrition game if the first blow fails.

i like this plan

what do you think of it Clap?

ntndeacon · 05-11-2009, 11:09 AM

I amm Assuming that the companies troops can't be reused either. I wonder if a strategy of letting the company expell thier troops might not be a workable strategy. I imagine we have more than enough folks to cover the loss of the first individual.

I believe we probably have to do more than win each time. (or at least a tie goes to the company) since our troops are not as good. If we are going to try to win this round. Iwould suggest a number that makes it less likely we tie.

ntndeacon · 05-11-2009, 11:10 AM

I was assuming 2 folks actually BK. but I guess 3 could easily be with bribery

05-11-2009, 06:29 AM	#3351
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	Who all is cleared? __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

05-11-2009, 06:29 AM	#3352
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	Adn for what its worth Lathum was on the cleared trusted list, and appears to be a wolf? __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

05-11-2009, 08:11 AM	#3362
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	The term "red-neck" comes from the Battle of Blair Mountain where miners wore red bandannas to identify themselves from the enemy. __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

05-11-2009, 08:12 AM	#3363
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	dT you trust PB as little as Lathum? did he reveal as a wolf? __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

05-11-2009, 08:13 AM	#3366
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	0- BK 1 - claphamsa 2 - Glengoyne 3 - NTN 4 - PB 5 - Heinze 6 - Danny 7 - Dadytorgo 8 - RendeR __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

05-11-2009, 07:05 AM	#3353
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	What will be of highest importance is figuring out how many camps we think we need to win. The wolves clearly know the answer to that question already. If we can nail how many camps we need to win, I feel pretty good about the game theory that will be required.

05-11-2009, 07:39 AM	#3356
PurdueBrad Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: DeKalb, IL	Will do BK. I will throw out what I think is a realistic number of wolves and a truly safe number to work from. I assume there are 2 wolves. A safe assumption to work from is 3, meaning we need to win three camps and that should be our goal. The one big advantage we have is that for every camp they lose, that is one more they need to win. As for my trust list: 1- Danny 2- Heinze 3- GlenGoyne 4- Claphamsa 5- CR 6- RendeR 7- ntndeacon 8- DT Obviously, no Lathum.

05-11-2009, 07:58 AM	#3359
DaddyTorgo Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Massachusetts	I'd assume 2-3 wolves. Thanks to Lathum for revealing, or we woulda been shot-to-shit there. My list (FWIW - I know I'm likely near the bottom of most people's so I don't expect it to carry a lot of weight). 1 - DaddyTorgo 2 - Glengoyne 3 - Heinze 4 - Chief Rum (he's got double jobs though, so idk if he'd be a good delegate) 5 - RendeR 6 - Danny 7 - Claphamsa 8 - NTN

05-11-2009, 08:31 AM	#3369
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	Please note, labor, that you can change appointees for different parts of the day. Barkeep could post "Appoint Abe" and then I run the first Stage, and then I have to go, so I could then post Appoint tanglewood and tanglewood runs Stages 2 and 3 and then might post Appoint Barkeep because BK will be around the next day but not tanglewood, etc. BK will always be allowed to override whoever is the appointee, because of his role. If Bk appoints Bek, but then does not like what Bek's posted # is, he can override it in a the last few minutes if he wants. You cannot "unappoint" but you can undo a number to resubmit a new one. Let's say Bek said: Use 100,000 soliders Then decides he wanted to change that to 200,000. He could simply: UnUse 100,000 soldiers Use 200k soldiers That would be fine. __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

05-11-2009, 08:33 AM	#3370
PurdueBrad Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: DeKalb, IL	Abe, point of clarification, can BK and his appointee PM each other to discuss strategy in private? This could be a big help so that BK can weed out sympathizers.

05-11-2009, 08:54 AM	#3372
ntndeacon Pro Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Alabama	probably not a big surprise, but I did keep one thing to myself....I had a nice rifle hoping that someone would come to see me at night. it was my second as I gave one away early.

05-11-2009, 09:02 AM	#3373
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	NTN, you gave one away? to who? does it matter anymore? it seems kills are random..... __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

05-11-2009, 09:02 AM	#3374
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	has abe let you know of any use for it durign the war? __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

05-11-2009, 09:37 AM	#3375
DaddyTorgo Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Massachusetts	whoops! forgot about you PB - i'd put you down there maybe right below danny. i did just copy your list and forgot to add you back in. as far as glen - given his potential slip of the tongue i'd knock him down a couple pegs there (down 2 maybe) __________________ If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :) BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5 ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9

05-11-2009, 09:37 AM	#3376
DaddyTorgo Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Massachusetts	why glen over heinzy? that was more of a gut-type thing...i'm fine with heinze. like i said - my play has been somewhat questionable all game so i doubt BK is going to put a ton of weight into my opinion __________________ If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :) BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5 ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9

05-11-2009, 09:39 AM	#3377
DaddyTorgo Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Massachusetts	0 - BK 1 - DaddyTorgo 2 - Heinze 3 - Chief Rum (he's got double jobs though, so idk if he'd be a good delegate) 4 - RendeR 5 - Danny 6 - Claphamsa 7 - Glengoyne 8 - PurdueBrad 9 - NTN 10 - Lathum (*BOOO HISSS....VOTE LATHUM!!) __________________ If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :) BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5 ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9

05-11-2009, 09:41 AM	#3378
DaddyTorgo Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Massachusetts	fuck - ummm...i think i'm arrested and shouldn't be talking? __________________ If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :) BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5 ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9

05-11-2009, 09:46 AM	#3380
RendeR Coordinator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Buffalo, NY	Well since Abe hasstated that items are useless now I will put my item out there for review. During the searching mission I discovered a Fiddle that, if a certain circumstance were to happen (loss of moral in a camp, noted by a very specific statement from Abe) then I could play the fiddle and counter the loss in moral by doing so. I'm assuming at this point that a situation simply never came up or had time to with the quickness that the main events happened. Clap, Why so little trust for me? Just to help anyone considering me: I was a searcher with X2 ability, I went on more missions than work and the missions I went on all succeeded as far as I can remember (not slogging through 68 pages of shyte to verify) There was a sympathizer among the searcher-skill people (Jackal) and I would be hard pressed to accept more than one sympathizer in any one specialty just because of the way the game mechanics seem to have run. Points against me: I've been very quiet since the first couple days and I missed one action/vote night altogether due to reality interjecting itself in the middle of my fantasy time. Now, lets go kick some Company ass. __________________ http://wotlabs.net/s...8/signature.png http://wotlabs.net/sig_dark/na/banichi18/signature.png

05-11-2009, 09:57 AM	#3382
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	oh yeah, ok __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

05-11-2009, 10:41 AM	#3386
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	They post publicly here in bold what the troop order is. Easy to coordinate that __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

05-11-2009, 10:48 AM	#3387
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	I have to be fitted for a Swine Flu mask at 1, which is not supposed to take that long, but just letting you know. __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

05-11-2009, 10:53 AM	#3389
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	Ok the sympathizers action should be in. So let's talk numbers. Again it would be helpful if we formed an idea of how many camps we think it takes to win. The idea should be to end the game, win or lose, with as few points as possible.

05-11-2009, 10:54 AM	#3390
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	Also I should not need anyone to take my stead today as I should be around for all 3 deadlines.

05-11-2009, 11:01 AM	#3394
RendeR Coordinator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Buffalo, NY	assume it takes 4 wins, divide our total by 5, keep 1 5th in reserve to augment things, hit them with 1 fifth today to see how things fall out. OR Hammer them today with overwhelming numbers, try to win with a single massive blow, holding a good amount in reserve to play out an attrition game if the first blow fails. OR Test the waters with a scouting force first, send it out into the flanks of the company areas to see how strong they are and test their defenses. Use that information to formulate the next assault using feints and counter moves to flush them into an area where our entire force can surround and eradicate them to the last worthless company scumbag. __________________ http://wotlabs.net/s...8/signature.png http://wotlabs.net/sig_dark/na/banichi18/signature.png

05-11-2009, 11:02 AM	#3395
RendeR Coordinator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Buffalo, NY	Lathum is such a tool. __________________ http://wotlabs.net/s...8/signature.png http://wotlabs.net/sig_dark/na/banichi18/signature.png

05-11-2009, 11:02 AM	#3396
RendeR Coordinator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Buffalo, NY	__________________ http://wotlabs.net/s...8/signature.png http://wotlabs.net/sig_dark/na/banichi18/signature.png

05-11-2009, 11:05 AM	#3397
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	I don't want to assume 4 wins just because it's the safe thing to do. If we assume 4 and it's 3 we dramatically reduce our chances of winning.

05-11-2009, 11:09 AM	#3399
ntndeacon Pro Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Alabama	I amm Assuming that the companies troops can't be reused either. I wonder if a strategy of letting the company expell thier troops might not be a workable strategy. I imagine we have more than enough folks to cover the loss of the first individual. I believe we probably have to do more than win each time. (or at least a tie goes to the company) since our troops are not as good. If we are going to try to win this round. Iwould suggest a number that makes it less likely we tie.

05-11-2009, 11:10 AM	#3400
ntndeacon Pro Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Alabama	I was assuming 2 folks actually BK. but I guess 3 could easily be with bribery

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)