 |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Maximum Overall Team Rating that we will allow for initial selection? | |||
| 80 |
  
|
8 | 72.73% |
| 81 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 82 |
  
|
1 | 9.09% |
| 83 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 84 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 85 |
  
|
1 | 9.09% |
| 86 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 87 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 88 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 89 |
|
0 | 0% |
| Other (please specify) |
|
1 | 9.09% |
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
06-18-2008, 07:21 AM
|
#1 | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
West Coast League: Team Selection Criteria
What is the maximum overall rating we should allow teams to have for the initial selection? I think 80 provides the best balance of challenge and a few teams to select from each conference, but a slight increase above that will allow more teams to be selected. I think if we go too much higher than that, we risk human teams becoming dominant.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.) GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers. GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen. |
||
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 09:00 AM
|
#2 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In the thick of it.
|
Sub 80, no question at all. Just for the sake of nobody starting out 36-0 right off the bat, and nabbing half the 5 star prospects every year.
__________________
I'm still here. Don't touch my fucking bacon. |
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 09:06 AM
|
#3 |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
Yeah, it'd be more fun to watch teams climb the ladder, rather than start of at the top and dominate forever.
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 10:47 AM
|
#4 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
I went with 80...Does that mean we include teams that have a 80 rating, or all teams just under 80?
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 10:55 AM
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
There are no teams with an 80 overall rating, but for purposes of the other options, I meant for it to be equal or less than the option you select.
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 12:57 PM
|
#6 |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
It should definitely be under 80, but I didn't read the thread beforehand, so I voted other. So, add another one to 80.
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 01:11 PM
|
#7 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
The 80s were a good time. Much better than the 90s.
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 01:20 PM
|
#8 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In the thick of it.
|
 Last Christmas I gave you my heart. But the very next day you gave it away.
__________________
I'm still here. Don't touch my fucking bacon. |
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 01:37 PM
|
#9 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
Ummm...maybe the music, not necessarily the clothes.
 |
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 05:43 PM
|
#10 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ohio
|
I said 80. But if someone had to use an 81-rated team in a conference that only has 4 choices (Big 10 & SEC I believe) then I would maybe/probably be okay with that. We'll see what conferences win in the selection first.
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 05:45 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Quote:
Well, we are going with 4 conferences with 3 teams. So that shouldn't be a problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
