 |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which car would you take? | |||
| 1995 Pontiac Trans-Am Convertible |
  
|
5 | 26.32% |
| 2000 Mercedes Benz S-500 with AMG sports package |
  
|
14 | 73.68% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
09-29-2010, 08:13 AM
|
#1 | ||
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlantic City, NJ
|
1995 Trans-Am or 2000 Benz S-500 ?
I have a brother-in law who is a car nut, and makes a very good living. He often has 5 cars in his driveway, gets them used and keeps them a few months before getting something else. His current fleet includes the above mentioned cars, as well as a 2006 escalade, a 1999 jaguar (rx8?) convertible, a mustang and a 1996 ford econoline (that he drives more than any of them.....)
He just got a big bonus at work, and wants to get something new. He has offered me either car, and I'm unsure which one to take. As a husband, and father of two boys, the benz is more practical. Beautiful car with 110,000 miles and the AMG sport package. My concerns lie in how much the maintenance will cost on it. I make about 40K per year, and as with most families of four, money is always tight. I've never had an expensive vehicle, and have been told routine maintenance on this car is very pricey.. Trans-Am is sweet. Only 72,000 miles, convertible, and painted white with a blue stripe down the center to match the 25th anniversary 1994 edition. Not practical, as my kids barely fit in the back seat, but I have a 1998 Honda passport to shuttle them around to practices, school, etc...My wife also has a saab that we can use if we need to drive any distance.. So, it seems I'm lucky, and will have a new vehicle.... Which one should I take? Last edited by Landshark44 : 09-29-2010 at 09:57 AM. |
||
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 08:17 AM
|
#2 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
|
Could be wrong, but I would venture a guess that the Benz will actually be cheaper to maintain than the Trans-Am.
Hell, ask your brother in law which requires more / more costly maintenance. Last edited by Coffee Warlord : 09-29-2010 at 08:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 08:19 AM
|
#3 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NC
|
If what you say about the maintenance costs is correct I say go for the Trans-Am because it's a convertible and has less miles. How many times do you have the chance to buy a convertible? That's a fun car.
__________________
"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball...and in the end it turns out that it was the other way around all the time." -Jim Bouton |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 08:30 AM
|
#4 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
|
Kind of agree with sami. If this is going to be Car #3, I don't know if it matters that the Benz is more practical. Or do you think you'll drive it regularly, then end up finding yourself in situations often where you'll suddenly need to shuttle all the kids around?
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 08:35 AM
|
#5 |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
People still drive Trans Ams?
 |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 09:39 AM
|
#6 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bath, ME
|
Sounds like it doesn't need to be a practical car. The question will be can you afford to keep up the insurance and maintenance on a third car in general. If it's just for fun, why not the Trans Am?
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 09:50 AM
|
#7 | |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlantic City, NJ
|
Quote:
I see what you guys are saying, about the trans-am being practical. As far as whether or not to take on a third car...... My Honda Passport has 187,000 miles on it. With another vehicle, I can extend it's lifespan, by limiting the amount of things I use it for.... I've alway been leaning towards taking the Trans-Am. I just though I'd post, in case it was a bad idea. I'm waiting for someone to say, "the Benz was $90,000 new, the trans-am was $23,000 new. Book value on the Benz is twice the Book value on the Trans-Am. Are you crazy?" |
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 10:03 AM
|
#8 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ashburn, VA
|
Voted for Mercedes because I laugh at Pontiacs when I see them in the road.
__________________
GO TERPS! https://www.flickr.com/photos/terpkristin https://twitter.com/terpkristin |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 10:05 AM
|
#9 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
|
Personally, I do not like Trans-Am so I would jump at the chance for the Benz....
__________________
"forgetting what is in the past, I strive for the future" |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 10:11 AM
|
#10 | ||
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Benz. The 95 Trans-Am is a hideously ugly car.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 10:14 AM
|
#11 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wisconsin
|
Assuming both are in the same condition (other than the mileage), and both are standard packages. Blue Book is around $10K for the Benz and $6.5K for the Trans Am from a private seller.
Not sure what the winter weather is like for you in NJ, but if you get the Trans Am, there might be periods where you aren't going to want to drive it. Is it a manual? If it is and you are in alot of traffic, I'd pass. I love manuals, but not if I'm in traffic all the time. If your brother is just giving it to you, I'd go with the Benz. Repairs might be more, but if it is something too catastrophic, you won't be out any money so, at that point you can figure out what to do.
__________________
You, you will regret what you have done this day. I will make you regret ever being born. Your going to wish you never left your mothers womb, where it was warm and safe... and wet. i am going to show you pain you never knew existed, you are going to see a whole new spectrum of pain, like a Rainboooow. But! This rainbow is not just like any other rainbow, its... Last edited by Mustang : 09-29-2010 at 10:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 11:17 AM
|
#12 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Benz, not even close. White cars are pretty fug.
Why not sell the Saab and establish a reserve account for car repairs/other costs? |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 11:20 AM
|
#13 |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Buffalo,NY
|
Trans-ams are cheaper to maintain...The after-market parts are cheaper
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 11:41 AM
|
#14 |
|
SI Games
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Melbourne, FL
|
If its purely a 'fun' car take which ever appeals to you more - sod practicalities .. from the sounds of things you're relatively sensible and already have things sorted, every now and then you have to indulge and have fun imho
 Last edited by Marc Vaughan : 09-29-2010 at 11:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 11:53 AM
|
#15 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego via Sausalito via San Jose via San Diego
|
Ask this guy what you should get...
__________________
I'm no longer a Chargers fan, they are dead to me Coming this summer to a movie theater near you: The Adventures of Jedikooter: Part 4 |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 12:51 PM
|
#16 | |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlantic City, NJ
|
Quote:
Saab is the wifes' car. She loves it.... |
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 01:00 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Quote:
I used to love the Trans Am, then the 1990's turned it into a characiture of what was great about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 01:00 PM
|
#18 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
I agree with Marc here. Since you have the practical angles covered, go for whichever you think is more fun.
Me, I'd go the Trans-Am. Convertible FTW.
__________________
2006 Golden Scribe Nominee 2006 Golden Scribe Winner Best Non-Sport Dynasty: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) Rookie Writer of the Year Dynasty of the Year: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
