|
View Poll Results: Celebrity Hot or Not 2.0, Vol. 98: Katherine Heigl | |||
HOT! | 78 | 48.45% | |
not... | 83 | 51.55% | |
Voters: 161. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
08-18-2012, 11:56 AM | #1 | ||
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
|
Celebrity Hot or Not 2.0, Vol. 98: Katherine Heigl
Well Olivia Wilde just barely broke the top ten on a wild ride to 87+%. Someone must think she's hot.
Up next is a woman that many of you may recognize, the first time I remember being graced with her hotness was in the TV show Roswell, and she's still just as hot as I remember. Most recently she was on Grey's Anatomy and has been doing film, Katherine Heigl.
__________________
Los Angeles Dodgers Check out the FOFC Groups on Facebook! and Reddit! DON'T REPORT ME BRO! Last edited by DanGarion : 08-18-2012 at 12:06 PM. |
||
08-18-2012, 12:11 PM | #4 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
|
|
08-18-2012, 12:37 PM | #5 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
|
id poke it
|
08-18-2012, 12:39 PM | #6 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
she is very attractive but doesn't do it for me.
|
08-18-2012, 12:44 PM | #7 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
More pasty-faced blondes with bozo lipstick. The only picture I liked was the brunette one except for its shortness. Hadn't seen her before, so not.
|
08-18-2012, 12:55 PM | #8 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
|
I just bought a tin of tiny blueberry muffins and they all smell good and they're tasty enough but there's about 20 of them, and they're all the same.
Also, she played a woman who was supposed to be better than Seth Rogan and she wasn't very good at it. Think about that shit. Plus I think she's kind of ugly. Nice body though. |
08-18-2012, 07:52 PM | #9 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
True she hasn't aged well, and she was pretty terrible in 27 Dresses, but I'll give her a nostalgic Hot anyway, for solid peak value.
__________________
2006 Golden Scribe Nominee 2006 Golden Scribe Winner Best Non-Sport Dynasty: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) Rookie Writer of the Year Dynasty of the Year: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) |
08-18-2012, 09:00 PM | #10 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bath, ME
|
Finally someone I can vote Not for. I was starting to feel like a sham voting Hot every time.
This is one of those people that's an easy Not vote for me. I know she's not ugly, and given the right picture or the right outfit or whatever, she can look good. But most of the time I don't find her attractive. Her features just are off to me for some reason. |
08-18-2012, 09:08 PM | #11 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
|
she was so smokin hot in Bride of chucky. but chucky was right, she went downhill fast. still shes hot and has a great body so anyone who says they wouldnt hit it is lying. just duck-tape her mouth shut
|
08-18-2012, 10:57 PM | #12 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
|
Yeah, for old times' sake (Under Siege 2).
__________________
null |
08-18-2012, 11:22 PM | #13 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Pretty much sums it up for me too.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
08-18-2012, 11:43 PM | #14 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Years ago yes, but she has never really done it for me. Especially of late.
|
08-19-2012, 08:45 AM | #15 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Definitely would, definitely not hot
|
08-19-2012, 09:33 AM | #16 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
I voted hot for her peak (Roswell.)
|
08-19-2012, 11:51 AM | #17 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Probably a good idea to avoid these threads in the future when working with all women. The nude could have gone badly. LOL
|
08-19-2012, 11:56 AM | #18 |
Go Reds
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
|
Dude, she is 33 not 53. Weirdos in here waxing nostalgia and talking about how she hasn't aged well.
|
08-19-2012, 12:41 PM | #19 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
|
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2012, 12:42 PM | #20 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
|
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2012, 12:42 PM | #21 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
|
08-19-2012, 03:49 PM | #22 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
I keep waiting for someone to break down the voting data and assign value to members. For example, if you're one of 15 not votes on an 85% hot chick, you're possible a outlier, etc. Once all that data has been formulated we could then isolate who is possibly just a griefer and/or who is just always a not or hot voter, and then reformulate the rankings based on those in the consensus. Or maybe I'm just a giant dork.
|
08-19-2012, 04:23 PM | #23 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
|
Quote:
Someone did put a list of voting together... |
|
08-21-2012, 02:52 PM | #25 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
From a discussion standpoint I suspect that the majority has grown weary of the same ol' arguments. But 140 votes is still a good indication of interest in the voting concept itself. I wonder how many threads here on any topic ever get 70, much less 140, individual posters?
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
08-21-2012, 02:54 PM | #26 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Wow. I voted "Not" but I didn't imagine she'd end up around 50/50. Yowzers.
|
08-21-2012, 03:58 PM | #27 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
|
When is Miley gonna go on? I got plenty to say bout that.
|
08-21-2012, 04:19 PM | #28 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
|
|
08-21-2012, 04:42 PM | #29 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
|
See. The debate is already spirited.
|
08-21-2012, 04:54 PM | #30 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Quote:
You vote hot 75% of the time. |
|
08-21-2012, 04:56 PM | #31 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Quote:
I actually have it in an Excel file, all the votes on the top 60 women (except the last 3 or 4 votes). Haven't figured out how to post it here (googledocs didn't work cause it loses too much formatting) |
|
08-21-2012, 04:57 PM | #32 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
What about me? How often do I vote hot?
|
08-21-2012, 05:00 PM | #33 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
|
08-21-2012, 05:00 PM | #34 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Though in your defense you voted 4 hot and 2 not out of the top 10, so maybe you have better taste. |
08-21-2012, 05:04 PM | #35 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Nope. Quote:
Yup. I'm discerning.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
08-21-2012, 05:04 PM | #36 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Were you the guy that dated the midget last year? |
08-21-2012, 05:05 PM | #37 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Midgets aside, if anyone knows how I can post the stats here I'll do it. I don't want to redo formatting in googledocs.
|
08-21-2012, 05:06 PM | #38 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Touche. It was years ago, and it was a blind-date setup by my sister with my future brother-in-law's cousin. I had almost forgotten about that though. Of course I'm probably too discerning - none of the women I've messaged on match.com have gotten back to me, and none of the like...2-3 who messaged me on their own were even remotely attractive to me. But I've started to loosen my standards there a little.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 08-21-2012 at 05:07 PM. |
08-21-2012, 05:09 PM | #39 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
We'll see. I'll sort your votes by date and see if you're voting hot more often now than you did before. |
08-21-2012, 05:10 PM | #40 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
LOL - I meant loosen my standards on match.com, but okay.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
08-21-2012, 05:12 PM | #41 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Actually, turns out you voted 50% hot in the last year, 57% before that.
|
08-21-2012, 05:13 PM | #42 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Rizon = HoN data-king.
|
08-21-2012, 05:15 PM | #43 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
...
|
08-21-2012, 05:17 PM | #44 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
38% of voters vote hot for everything?
That's fucking weak guys...be at least a little discriminating. |
08-21-2012, 05:20 PM | #45 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Madison, WI
|
What's my percentage, Rizon? (Though I probably have a small sample size.)
|
08-21-2012, 05:35 PM | #46 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Quote:
93.8% |
|
08-21-2012, 06:12 PM | #47 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Madison, WI
|
Sheesh! (In my defense, I tend to abstain a bit instead of voting Not.)
|
08-21-2012, 06:20 PM | #48 |
assmaster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bloomington, IN
|
I would have never guessed that Eaglesfan27 was the easiest guy on FOFC.
|
08-21-2012, 06:56 PM | #49 |
n00b
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
|
WOW! I always wanted to be first in something. 18 NOT votes. Guess I'm a picky person.
|
08-21-2012, 07:11 PM | #50 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|