LXXVIII: Politicus Lupus (GAME OVER!! SEE POST #2593 FOR RESULTS) - Page 14

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit

Gotcha.

And are you guys planning on trying to lynch the Democratic Leader today?

I'd prefer it if you didn't.

I am not going to vote for you today.

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 03:21 PM

In the Observation Act it should be any role passed via legislation, either previous or future. So it will cover the seer, BG, what have you.

KWhit · 07-23-2008, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

I am not going to vote for you today.

Very good.

I am just hoping this doesn't become all Democrats vote for A and all Republicans vote for B.

Especially if B = KWhit.

mccollins · 07-23-2008, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

In the Observation Act it should be any role passed via legislation, either previous or future. So it will cover the seer, BG, what have you.

I was just getting ready to ask if you could amend that in - good job.

Passacaglia · 07-23-2008, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit

Very good.

I am just hoping this doesn't become all Democrats vote for A and all Republicans vote for B.

Especially if B = KWhit.

Look to your own party, then. So far, all Democrats have voted for A, but not all Republicans have voted for B.

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit

Very good.

I am just hoping this doesn't become all Democrats vote for A and all Republicans vote for B.

Especially if B = KWhit.

That I will not guarantee :P

mccollins · 07-23-2008, 03:25 PM

I like the Observation Act, but it may be too conservative for my constituents' liking. I'll have to give this some thought.

KWhit · 07-23-2008, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

Look to your own party, then. So far, all Democrats have voted for A, but not all Republicans have voted for B.

I understand that, which is what brought this up. My fellow party members have reacted strongly to the fact that a Republican placed an early, unwarranted vote on the Leader of their party.

That provoked some strong feelings in a few of them, hence their votes.

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 03:27 PM

VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

Passacaglia · 07-23-2008, 03:28 PM

VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT
VOTE NO ON WOLF SECURITY ACT REDUX

st.cronin · 07-23-2008, 03:29 PM

VOTE YES WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

KWhit · 07-23-2008, 03:31 PM

I must follow the wishes of my constituants.

Vote No on Wolf Observation Act

st.cronin · 07-23-2008, 03:32 PM

dola, just clicked on the Dem thread by accident, clicking from one window to another. Saw nothing.

henry296 · 07-23-2008, 03:32 PM

VOTE YES on Wolf Observation Act - what is good for anyone is good for me and my people

PackerFanatic · 07-23-2008, 03:35 PM

VOTE YES WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

This is for the good of the country!

Chubby · 07-23-2008, 03:36 PM

catching up

chesapeake · 07-23-2008, 03:38 PM

Where is the provision requiring a warrant?!! More legislation that clearly violates the 4th Amendment. When you guys go into your caucus to write this tripe, do you tear pages off of the Bill of Rights and scribble it on the back? Outrageous!

VOTE NO WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

claphamsa · 07-23-2008, 03:47 PM

VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chesapeake

Where is the provision requiring a warrant?!! More legislation that clearly violates the 4th Amendment. When you guys go into your caucus to write this tripe, do you tear pages off of the Bill of Rights and scribble it on the back? Outrageous!

VOTE NO WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

Yup. And we'll do it while we eat a baby seal while driving a Hummer firing assault rifles randomly driving to church. You got a problem with that?

Chubby · 07-23-2008, 03:48 PM

VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT
VOTE YES ON WOLF SECURITY ACT REDUX

My bill should be coming shortly...

chesapeake · 07-23-2008, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Yup. And we'll do it while we eat a baby seal while driving a Hummer firing assault rifles randomly driving to church. You got a problem with that?

I'm assuming that this also involves running over your illegal immigrant nanny for whom you have simply forgotten to pay your payroll taxes?

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chesapeake

I'm assuming that this also involves running over your illegal immigrant nanny for whom you have simply forgotten to pay your payroll taxes?

Payroll taxes are for sissies.

jeheinz72 · 07-23-2008, 03:58 PM

VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

Passacaglia · 07-23-2008, 03:58 PM

Not sure if I'll be back for deadline.

VOTE LYNCH HENRY296

jeheinz72 · 07-23-2008, 03:59 PM

I don't think Clap is a wolf. That's pretty ridiculous given the events of his veto suggestion last night. I'll likely be voting for someone who is currently voting for Clap.

KWhit · 07-23-2008, 04:08 PM

I am going to place a vote on someone who hasn't seemed to contribute much (at least publicly in this thread).

Vote Lynch Mrs. Schmidty

KWhit · 07-23-2008, 04:14 PM

FYI: I think the Speaker's bill should be coming shortly, so stick around and vote if you can.

Lathum · 07-23-2008, 04:18 PM

VOTE NO ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

Lathum · 07-23-2008, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

I don't think Clap is a wolf. That's pretty ridiculous given the events of his veto suggestion last night. I'll likely be voting for someone who is currently voting for Clap.

events in this thread or your private one?

Chubby · 07-23-2008, 04:21 PM

NATIONAL SEER COMMUNICATION BILL
Sponsors: Henry296 & PackerFan

WHEREAS, the newly created "Seer" possesses unique gifts of insight but limited means of communication:

BE IT RESOLVED:

The Seer Communications Network is hereby established. This mechanism allows for a member of congress to be named as "SeerSpeaker" and granted certain special attributes:
Knowledge of the Seer's identity
PM exchange with the Seer - Once per day. One originating from the Seer to the SeerSpeaker and one from the SeerSpeaker to the Seer. These PMs must also include Chief Rum and Oliegirl.
The SeerSpeaker shall be chosen randomly by our Creator (Chief Rum) from the pool of non-Wolf, non-Seer members of Congress.

Chubby · 07-23-2008, 04:21 PM

Vote YES on National Seer Communication Bill

KWhit · 07-23-2008, 04:22 PM

Vote YES on National Seer Communication Bill

KWhit · 07-23-2008, 04:23 PM

Thumbs up!

PackerFanatic · 07-23-2008, 04:23 PM

VOTE PASS NATIONAL SEER COMMUNICATION BILL

This bill is proof that the Democrats are all about what is best for the country and not just worried about their "political image".

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 04:24 PM

So...you complain about the constitutionality of our bill...and then you submit something designed to give us a free clear a day, free use of our seer data with no real downside, and the ability to coordinate good guy actions without letting the wolves know anything? Are you nuts?

chesapeake · 07-23-2008, 04:25 PM

Vote YES on National Seer Communication Bill

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 04:26 PM

Okay, that is slightly changed from the way it was originally posited, because now it's just one guy. It's still nuts - it's pretty much giving the seer an extra life and us an extra scan attached to a role that doesn't have any independent value. It's not nuts nuts but it still makes me feel really queasy.

Lathum · 07-23-2008, 04:27 PM

VOTE YES ON NATIONAL SEER COMMUNICATION BILL

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 04:29 PM

Can't do it politically and I'm pretty sure it's cruisin' for a bruisin' in its current form. It's probably one piece too strong, IMO.

VOTE NO ON SEER COMM BILL

EagleFan · 07-23-2008, 04:29 PM

vote yes National Seer communication act

vote yet National Wolf Security Act Redux

jeheinz72 · 07-23-2008, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum

events in this thread or your private one?

This thread, given his staunch and initial desire to reject the bill with the rider on it I think it's less likely clap is a wolf.

jeheinz72 · 07-23-2008, 04:32 PM

Yowza, hard to think that one is going to be constitutional.

EagleFan · 07-23-2008, 04:33 PM

Yet another fine job done by the democrats to help us survive the evil that is the Republican party (oh, and the wolves too).

As long as the Supreme Court doesn't continue to trample the constitution and legislate we will be okay.

KWhit · 07-23-2008, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Can't do it politically and I'm pretty sure it's cruisin' for a bruisin' in its current form. It's probably one piece too strong, IMO.

VOTE NO ON SEER COMM BILL

Can't do it politically? Since it is Seer related, I'm pretty sure it will be considered a Republican-type role and be beneficial to you guys.

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit

Can't do it politically? Since it is Seer related, I'm pretty sure it will be considered a Republican-type role and be beneficial to you guys.

Ah, crap, I totally got it backwards. Ahhhh damnit.

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 04:35 PM

Suppose that's fair, it'll eat you guys alive, too, so fair is fair.

Lathum · 07-23-2008, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

This thread, given his staunch and initial desire to reject the bill with the rider on it I think it's less likely clap is a wolf.

bah

that would be an easy way for a wolf to try and gain trust...

claphamsa · 07-23-2008, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chubby

NATIONAL SEER COMMUNICATION BILL
Sponsors: Henry296 & PackerFan

WHEREAS, the newly created "Seer" possesses unique gifts of insight but limited means of communication:

BE IT RESOLVED:

The Seer Communications Network is hereby established. This mechanism allows for a member of congress to be named as "SeerSpeaker" and granted certain special attributes:
Knowledge of the Seer's identity
PM exchange with the Seer - Once per day. One originating from the Seer to the SeerSpeaker and one from the SeerSpeaker to the Seer. These PMs must also include Chief Rum and Oliegirl.
The SeerSpeaker shall be chosen randomly by our Creator (Chief Rum) from the pool of non-Wolf, non-Seer members of Congress.

I see no way this passes constitutionality!

Tyrith · 07-23-2008, 04:37 PM

My gut instinct - revise, take out the PM part and just let the seer speaker know the results of the scans, and then it would probably pass muster.

jeheinz72 · 07-23-2008, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum

bah

that would be an easy way for a wolf to try and gain trust...

Yeah, to support it, but I don't think a wolf would be the first one to speak against it. Regardless, that's my opinion. I don't think clap is a wolf at the moment. I suspect neither do the dems as it was a retaliate and pile on look of a vote.

07-23-2008, 03:29 PM	#661
st.cronin General Manager Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: New Mexico	VOTE YES WOLF OBSERVATION ACT __________________ co-commish: bb-bbcf.net knives out

07-23-2008, 03:32 PM	#663
st.cronin General Manager Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: New Mexico	dola, just clicked on the Dem thread by accident, clicking from one window to another. Saw nothing. __________________ co-commish: bb-bbcf.net knives out

07-23-2008, 03:32 PM	#664
henry296 College Starter Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Pittsburgh, PA	VOTE YES on Wolf Observation Act - what is good for anyone is good for me and my people __________________ "It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson

07-23-2008, 03:35 PM	#665
PackerFanatic Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Appleton, WI	VOTE YES WOLF OBSERVATION ACT This is for the good of the country! __________________ Commissioner of the RNFL

07-23-2008, 03:47 PM	#668
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

07-23-2008, 03:21 PM	#652
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	In the Observation Act it should be any role passed via legislation, either previous or future. So it will cover the seer, BG, what have you.

07-23-2008, 03:25 PM	#657
mccollins College Prospect Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Nicholasville, KY	I like the Observation Act, but it may be too conservative for my constituents' liking. I'll have to give this some thought.

07-23-2008, 03:27 PM	#659
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

07-23-2008, 03:28 PM	#660
Passacaglia Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Big Ten Country	VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT VOTE NO ON WOLF SECURITY ACT REDUX

07-23-2008, 03:31 PM	#662
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	I must follow the wishes of my constituants. Vote No on Wolf Observation Act

07-23-2008, 03:36 PM	#666
Chubby Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Syracuse, NY	catching up

07-23-2008, 03:38 PM	#667
chesapeake College Starter Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Arlington, VA	Where is the provision requiring a warrant?!! More legislation that clearly violates the 4th Amendment. When you guys go into your caucus to write this tripe, do you tear pages off of the Bill of Rights and scribble it on the back? Outrageous! VOTE NO WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

07-23-2008, 03:48 PM	#670
Chubby Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Syracuse, NY	VOTE YES ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT VOTE YES ON WOLF SECURITY ACT REDUX My bill should be coming shortly...

07-23-2008, 03:58 PM	#674
Passacaglia Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Big Ten Country	Not sure if I'll be back for deadline. VOTE LYNCH HENRY296

07-23-2008, 04:08 PM	#676
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	I am going to place a vote on someone who hasn't seemed to contribute much (at least publicly in this thread). Vote Lynch Mrs. Schmidty

07-23-2008, 04:14 PM	#677
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	FYI: I think the Speaker's bill should be coming shortly, so stick around and vote if you can.

07-23-2008, 04:18 PM	#678
Lathum Favored Bitch #1 Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: homeless in NJ	VOTE NO ON WOLF OBSERVATION ACT

07-23-2008, 04:21 PM	#680
Chubby Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Syracuse, NY	NATIONAL SEER COMMUNICATION BILL Sponsors: Henry296 & PackerFan WHEREAS, the newly created "Seer" possesses unique gifts of insight but limited means of communication: BE IT RESOLVED: The Seer Communications Network is hereby established. This mechanism allows for a member of congress to be named as "SeerSpeaker" and granted certain special attributes: Knowledge of the Seer's identity PM exchange with the Seer - Once per day. One originating from the Seer to the SeerSpeaker and one from the SeerSpeaker to the Seer. These PMs must also include Chief Rum and Oliegirl. The SeerSpeaker shall be chosen randomly by our Creator (Chief Rum) from the pool of non-Wolf, non-Seer members of Congress.

07-23-2008, 04:21 PM	#681
Chubby Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Syracuse, NY	Vote YES on National Seer Communication Bill

07-23-2008, 04:22 PM	#682
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	Vote YES on National Seer Communication Bill

07-23-2008, 04:23 PM	#683
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	Thumbs up!

07-23-2008, 04:23 PM	#684
PackerFanatic Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Appleton, WI	VOTE PASS NATIONAL SEER COMMUNICATION BILL This bill is proof that the Democrats are all about what is best for the country and not just worried about their "political image". __________________ Commissioner of the RNFL

07-23-2008, 04:24 PM	#685
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	So...you complain about the constitutionality of our bill...and then you submit something designed to give us a free clear a day, free use of our seer data with no real downside, and the ability to coordinate good guy actions without letting the wolves know anything? Are you nuts?

07-23-2008, 04:25 PM	#686
chesapeake College Starter Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Arlington, VA	Vote YES on National Seer Communication Bill

07-23-2008, 04:26 PM	#687
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	Okay, that is slightly changed from the way it was originally posited, because now it's just one guy. It's still nuts - it's pretty much giving the seer an extra life and us an extra scan attached to a role that doesn't have any independent value. It's not nuts nuts but it still makes me feel really queasy.

07-23-2008, 04:27 PM	#688
Lathum Favored Bitch #1 Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: homeless in NJ	VOTE YES ON NATIONAL SEER COMMUNICATION BILL

07-23-2008, 04:29 PM	#689
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	Can't do it politically and I'm pretty sure it's cruisin' for a bruisin' in its current form. It's probably one piece too strong, IMO. VOTE NO ON SEER COMM BILL

07-23-2008, 04:29 PM	#690
EagleFan Hall Of Famer Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA	vote yes National Seer communication act vote yet National Wolf Security Act Redux

07-23-2008, 04:33 PM	#693
EagleFan Hall Of Famer Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA	Yet another fine job done by the democrats to help us survive the evil that is the Republican party (oh, and the wolves too). As long as the Supreme Court doesn't continue to trample the constitution and legislate we will be okay.

07-23-2008, 04:35 PM	#696
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	Suppose that's fair, it'll eat you guys alive, too, so fair is fair.

07-23-2008, 04:37 PM	#699
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	My gut instinct - revise, take out the PM part and just let the seer speaker know the results of the scans, and then it would probably pass muster.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)