12-11-2004, 05:39 PM | #1 | ||
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
OT:Heisman voters...
Just a small venting.
I hate how guys refuse to say who they voted for or in what order they voted the guys. Why refuse to say? I see no problem with saying who you voted for.
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose! |
||
12-11-2004, 06:02 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
|
Because they'd have to defend their votes.
|
12-11-2004, 06:27 PM | #3 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
Quote:
Which is stupid, because they are already sitting there on ESPN talking about the pros/cons of each guy. Annoying.
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose! |
|
12-11-2004, 06:59 PM | #4 | |
Hokie, Hokie, Hokie, Hi
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Kennesaw, GA
|
Quote:
Just sayin' |
|
12-11-2004, 07:21 PM | #5 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
Quote:
I saw that. I thought he was about to avoid it and then he said. I understand some guys will say. Which makes me wonder more why others won't.
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose! |
|
12-11-2004, 07:38 PM | #6 |
World Champion Mis-speller
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
|
Buck Belue voted for Pollack.
|
12-11-2004, 07:43 PM | #7 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
You really want to be on the commitee with a guy you voted 5th (publicly), but who won anyway?
Last edited by Deattribution : 12-11-2004 at 07:44 PM. |
12-11-2004, 07:45 PM | #8 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
Quote:
No one has won yet, announced later.
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose! |
|
12-11-2004, 08:01 PM | #9 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
What funny is, this year is the first year in a while that a previous winner is in the running for it again - and thus, has a vote.
__________________
Current dynasty: OOTP25 Blitz: RTS meets Moneyball / Women's Basketball Alternate History | OOTP Mod: Managerial Strategy Files | GM Excel Competitive Balance Tax/Revenue Sharing Calc | FBCB Mods on Github |
12-11-2004, 08:05 PM | #10 | |
World Champion Mis-speller
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
|
Quote:
Yup, said he is voting for Pederson. |
|
12-11-2004, 08:07 PM | #11 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
Quote:
Adrian Peterson is gonna be pissed |
|
12-11-2004, 08:16 PM | #12 | |
World Champion Mis-speller
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
|
Quote:
Check the monicker. I knew was wrong but wasn't in the mood to google it to check. |
|
12-11-2004, 08:56 PM | #13 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
Matt Leinhart wins like I thought.
But was White tearing up? -------------------------------- Commissioner of the Imperial Football League (sorry but I no longer allowed any kind of signature) |
12-11-2004, 08:58 PM | #14 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
dola- Matt Leinart.
Maybe an non-QB can win next year? Oh well.......... |
12-11-2004, 09:22 PM | #15 |
Greatly Missed. (7/11/84-06/12/05)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Palo Alto, CA
|
Congrats Matt, your cursed.
|
12-11-2004, 09:23 PM | #16 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
I am suprised no one is really commenting, not much interest in the Heisman Award?
Or are guys afraid their posts would be deleted if it was in a thread I started? Last edited by Cringer : 12-11-2004 at 09:23 PM. |
12-11-2004, 10:56 PM | #17 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Eh, I don't think the intrigue is there. I think I have a problem with an award like that always being awarded to a player that fits their conception of the Heisman winner, rather than to the best player in D-1A college football (let's face it, you're not gonna get a winner from any other level.)
Still, he's deserving I guess. But I'm sure Peterson will still do okay, provided he keeps racking up the numbers over the next few years. 2nd isn't exactly chopped liver as a freshman and beating out a former winner (even if he did vote for you)
__________________
Current dynasty: OOTP25 Blitz: RTS meets Moneyball / Women's Basketball Alternate History | OOTP Mod: Managerial Strategy Files | GM Excel Competitive Balance Tax/Revenue Sharing Calc | FBCB Mods on Github |
12-11-2004, 11:15 PM | #18 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
The margin of victory was pretty much what I expected. I'm a little surprised Bush was 5th, but I think he will be much higher next year.
|
12-11-2004, 11:19 PM | #19 | |||
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Muskogee, OK USA
|
Quote:
I know.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-11-2004, 11:20 PM | #20 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Sep 2002
|
[quote=Dark Cloud]Eh, I don't think the intrigue is there. I think I have a problem with an award like that always being awarded to a player that fits their conception of the Heisman winner, rather than to the best player in D-1A college football (let's face it, you're not gonna get a winner from any other level.)
QUOTE] What do you mean by this? |
12-12-2004, 12:07 AM | #21 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
I dunno. I was sleepy and I just got off work.
__________________
Current dynasty: OOTP25 Blitz: RTS meets Moneyball / Women's Basketball Alternate History | OOTP Mod: Managerial Strategy Files | GM Excel Competitive Balance Tax/Revenue Sharing Calc | FBCB Mods on Github |
12-12-2004, 07:21 AM | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
|
Quote:
The (strange) thing about Bush is...he looks awesome playing the game (I think he's amazing), but he only has 2 games over 100 yards rushing in his career, and 2 games with over 100 yards receiving. |
|
12-12-2004, 10:33 AM | #23 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Land O Lakes FL
|
For me, this year lacked that clear “Heisman” moment. The one moment where when you saw you said “there is your Heisman winner” I thought Adrian Peterson came the closest with his performance against OSU. It reminds me of the BCS. You had worthy candidates, all bunched together as far as their credentials. So how do you distinguish between these five candidates? I am surprised by the margin of victory however. I expected it to be much closer. I guess Adrian Peterson and Jason White pulled more votes from each other than Reggie Bush and Matt Leinart. I am happy to see that Peterson came in second at least. He would have been my choice but at least there was a blatant disregard for his season just because he was a freshman.
|
12-12-2004, 10:39 AM | #24 | |
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
Not really. It's pretty easy these days. Look at the #1 team. Their QB wins the Heisman.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! |
|
12-12-2004, 10:46 AM | #25 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
Caveat: I don't really follow College Football, sticking mostly to the NFL. It seems to me that most of the time the Heisman ends up being awarded on the basis of a popularity contest. It seems that about 75% of the time the winner sinks without a trace once he enters the NFL. It also seems that by the time the Bowls come around, there's someone else who is performing way better in the really big games that matter. That's why I generally don't comment. |
|
12-12-2004, 10:48 AM | #26 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
|
Quote:
For real? Did he make a good case for it, other than him being the best defensive player at UGA? |
|
12-12-2004, 12:08 PM | #27 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Sep 2002
|
Quote:
The winner may sink when he enters the NFL but the Heisman awards the best player in college football that year, not the best prospect for the NFL. Bowl games matter, besides the BCS? Also, to judge the players on the performance on one game is not good. Look at the big games over the season, when games really do count. |
|
12-12-2004, 03:01 PM | #28 | |
World Champion Mis-speller
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
|
Quote:
Last edited by GrantDawg : 12-12-2004 at 03:02 PM. |
|
12-12-2004, 03:02 PM | #29 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Good points. I hadn't really thought of it that way.
|
12-12-2004, 03:11 PM | #30 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Well usually most people would consider the most outstanding player as an offensive guy. Defense is more of a 'team' thing than an individual thing than Offense can be.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
12-12-2004, 03:21 PM | #31 | |
World Champion Mis-speller
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
|
Quote:
It is all a team thing. It is a team game. If your going to have an award of the "Most Outstanding Player," then you have to consider both sides of the ball (and the O-line too). AND the most outstanding player doesn't have to be on a national championship contender, either. I believe the award is about as over rated as the MNC. |
|
12-12-2004, 03:25 PM | #32 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Yeah, but on offense, players can stand out more. You can see the impact of an offensive player much more than you can a single defensive player.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
12-12-2004, 03:35 PM | #33 | |
World Champion Mis-speller
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
|
Quote:
So? And QB's get all the pub, which is why most of the voters vote for them, even though many of them never even watch them play a game. It just underlines what a joke the award is. |
|
12-12-2004, 03:37 PM | #34 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
Quote:
Aye- it seem inane. when Woodson won the award, I thought their was a genuine movement towards a best player, as opposed to best player on best team. |
|
12-12-2004, 07:12 PM | #35 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jun 2003
|
I swear, the Heisman voters all watch the highlights(which show only the big teams) and they base their votes off the biased highlights and commentary going along with it.
__________________
wbatl1 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|