Simulated ERA's Out Of Control...
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Simulated ERA's Out Of Control...
I used OSFM rosters, the updated ones.
And I didn't notice anything about interleague play, to whomever asked.Comment
-
Re: Simulated ERA's Out Of Control...
Maybe they just think the growing trend in strikeouts will continue? We're past the 20% mark this season IIRC.PSN: KMRBlue1027
PS4 Games:
Battlefield 4
MLB: The Show (Duh)
DestinyComment
-
Comment
-
Re: Simulated ERA's Out Of Control...
Wasn't it the other way round in MLB 13? I'm sure I remember most pitchers having an ERA of 4 or higher when you got 5 or so seasons in?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using TapatalkSupporting Leeds United, Colorado Rockies, Detroit Lions and the Colorado Avalanche!
Now Playing FIFA, UFC 4, PGA Tour 2k23, WWE, MLB The Show and Dirt Rally 2.0Comment
-
Re: Simulated ERA's Out Of Control...
Strikeouts and ERA leaders stats do get a little off in future seasons, but the team averages maintain pretty close to current levels. Team batting averages, eras all seem within the deviation.
I think it's a product of mlb having so many good young pitchers right now. The progression system needs to work for All players. So young players that are throwing up stats in 2013 that we would expect, progress in future seasons.
Like someone else mentioned, I would rather have lower eras then inflated 5 eras for every team. I am curious if increasing the contact ratings and vision of some of the A potential prospects will help bring up the league leaders batting averages in the future, while lowering k ratings for some pitchers?
Sent from my iPad using TapatalkComment
-
Re: Simulated ERA's Out Of Control...
Strikeouts and ERA leaders stats do get a little off in future seasons, but the team averages maintain pretty close to current levels. Team batting averages, eras all seem within the deviation.
I think it's a product of mlb having so many good young pitchers right now. The progression system needs to work for All players. So young players that are throwing up stats in 2013 that we would expect, progress in future seasons.
Like someone else mentioned, I would rather have lower eras then inflated 5 eras for every team. I am curious if increasing the contact ratings and vision of some of the A potential prospects will help bring up the league leaders batting averages in the future, while lowering k ratings for some pitchers?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It would get tedious to have to edit rookies EVERY year though.
I'll try this when I have the time and will post results.Comment
-
Re: Simulated ERA's Out Of Control...
I don't have any solid numbers for you but when I skimmed over the pitching rotations I noticed that the majority of pitchers we're throwing high 3s / low 4s (4.00 ERA's we're more common).
This could be an effect of high number of potent hitting prospects generated over time as well as the CPU's poor handling of pitching rotations, prioritizing hitting over fielding ability etc...
On another note: The game generates way too many skinny midget prospects. I don't want the 5'7" 160 pounder even if he does have 98 potential. CPU will swoop him up though.Last edited by dregos; 05-16-2014, 02:00 PM.Comment
Comment