I think Medium looks more "real"...

[capa]

I love the Medium camera view when playing. It just looks more like a broadcast to me, and the players look more appropriately scaled. Sometimes on Broadcast view there does not appear to be as much outfield, or space between fielders. I think Medium view does an excellent job of representing the dimensions.

How about you?

C

[takki]

Re: I think Medium looks more "real"...

I'll have to try it out next time I play.

[Herschie]

Re: I think Medium looks more "real"...

I was thinking this too. Looks more like a real broadcast. The problem is that the "broadcast" camera angle is too low. I hate to bring up MVP 2005, but they had the perfect angle, as did All Star 2005.

Lesson learned; if I'm thinking it, other people probably are as well.

[countryboy]

Re: I think Medium looks more "real"...

its the camera that I use while playing.

[The_Dude88]

Re: I think Medium looks more "real"...

I've got a question for you. Have you noticed if robbing homeruns at the wall is a little easier with the camera set at medium?

[Steven78]

Re: I think Medium looks more "real"...

I use medium both batting and fielding. I think it's also the best view for judging the ball trajectory.

[capa]

Re: I think Medium looks more "real"...

I've got a question for you. Have you noticed if robbing homeruns at the wall is a little easier with the camera set at medium?

I use autofielding and manual throwing so I can't comment on robbing hrs...

C

[diesel777]

Re: I think Medium looks more "real"...

Medium does seem to give the best spacing when batting and in the field. I always use it.

[COMMISSIONERHBK9]

Re: I think Medium looks more "real"...

Awesome camera thanks