That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

[erndawg3]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

good point on good questions asked. Too bad you can't block anyone that has ETA in there question or response

[Knight165]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

You and I spent many years at The Perfect Game forums and it was lax as can be over there. And we had a really good time, didn't we.

We did....but different times and a MUCH smaller group!!!
Wow that was a long time ago....that and the dugout!


M.K.
Knight165

[bkrich83]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

We did....but different times and a MUCH smaller group!!!

Wow that was a long time ago....that and the dugout!





M.K.

Knight165

I miss the dugout. I didn't post much but lurked there. HH is still my favorite game of all time.

[deadlocked]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

attack the game developers in any way

If we are being honest here, this part of the post should be troubling to everyone that posts here. We should be able to discuss the Devs freely until it violates the overarching TOS.

[Millennium]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

If we are being honest here, this part of the post should be troubling to everyone that posts here. We should be able to discuss the Devs freely until it violates the overarching TOS.

You can CONSTRUCTIVELY discuss anything. You attack ANYONE and that is where the ban comes in.

Calling devs "lazy" when you don't know anything about the process in unnecessary and does nothing but feed the posters need to vent. This is not the place to vent.

And I use lazy as an example because that's what you called them here:

http://www.operationsports.com/forum...p?p=2048125915

And look! You aren't banned. But please consider making more of an effort to understand game development before using terms like that.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

[deadlocked]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

You can CONSTRUCTIVELY discuss anything. You attack ANYONE and that is where the ban comes in.

Calling devs "lazy" when you don't know anything about the process in unnecessary and does nothing but feed the posters need to vent. This is not the place to vent.

And I use lazy as an example because that's what you called them here:

http://www.operationsports.com/forum...p?p=2048125915

And look! You aren't banned. But please consider making more of an effort to understand game development before using terms like that.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

That's the point, I know game development enough to know that if one dev has done it another can too. It's not like I'm calling them lazy for not doing something that hasn't been done before. Hell some old MLB 2K staffers are probably with SDS now anyway.

[Millennium]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

That's the point, I know game development enough to know that if one dev has done it another can too. It's not like I'm calling them lazy for not doing something that hasn't been done before. Hell some old MLB 2K staffers are probably with SDS now anyway.

You're using words like "probably". That shows you don't know.

You are also talking about console generation jumps that almost every sports have lost features on.

The point is you don't know, and acting like you do is doing a disservice to game developers who do.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

[deadlocked]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

You're using words like "probably". That shows you don't know.

You are also talking about console generation jumps that almost every sports have lost features on.

The point is you don't know, and acting like you do is doing a disservice to game developers who do.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

I said probably because I don't follow who works where and where the MLB 2k team went after the game ended.

[Millennium]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

I said probably because I don't follow who works where and where the MLB 2k team went after the game ended.

OK - so answer this:

What is the programming time to add the A teams?

How much extra development time have they had since moving to PS4?

What is involved, in programming terms, on adding the teams, including working them into franchise?

What are the licensing costs of the Single A franchises?

Is there enough disc size for all of the uniforms (since that has been one of the issues the devs have stated they are running into)?

Those are questions I came up with with limited development knowledge and 5 minutes. Do you have answers?



Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

[deadlocked]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

OK - so answer this:

What is the programming time to add the A teams?

How much extra development time have they had since moving to PS4?

What is involved, in programming terms, on adding the teams, including working them into franchise?

What are the licensing costs of the Single A franchises?

Is there enough disc size for all of the uniforms (since that has been one of the issues the devs have stated they are running into)?

Those are questions I came up with with limited development knowledge and 5 minutes. Do you have answers?

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

The already have generic stadiums, so just just need to license and add the logos, teams, and maybe uniforms (or just use generic uniforms with the logo). Including them into franchise would be minimal as they would just need to port the AAA/AA netcode and change the teams to the A teams.

Costs would be lower or similar to AA, not to mention I refuse to accept the MLB/MiLB doesn't include A packaged in.

If they are using the entire disc then they need better compression or are being handicapped by PS3 (which they should've cycled out this season).

PS: My first ever post has still yet to appear published on the FIFA thread it's supposed to be in...

[Millennium]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

The already have generic stadiums, so just just need to license and add the logos, teams, and maybe uniforms (or just use generic uniforms with the logo). Including them into franchise would be minimal as they would just need to port the AAA/AA netcode and change the teams to the A teams.

Costs would be lower or similar to AA, not to mention I refuse to accept the MLB/MiLB doesn't include A packaged in.

If they are using the entire disc then they need better compression or are being handicapped by PS3 (which they should've cycled out this season).

PS: My first ever post has still yet to appear published on the FIFA thread it's supposed to be in...

None of this answers my questions in programming terms. I'm looking for specifics for timeline and cost purposes. Generals don't explain to me how the devs are "lazy".

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

[deadlocked]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

None of this answers my questions in programming terms. I'm looking for specifics for timeline and cost purposes. Generals don't explain to me how the devs are "lazy".

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

If they use the base code from the other minor leagues they can get everything done in no more than a month and drop several k for the license if they aren't already paying for the licenses. They will be making several million from microtransactions alone so it's not like they will be hurting for money.

In fact they don't need the whole team now that the game is out so they could move several over the next game now to start work and have them focus on A.

[Millennium]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

If they use the base code from the other minor leagues they can get everything done in no more than a month and drop several k for the license if they aren't already paying for the licenses. They will be making several million from microtransactions alone so it's not like they will be hurting for money.

In fact they don't need the whole team now that the game is out so they could move several over the next game now to start work and have them focus on A.

So we're going to keep going back and forth like you did in the other thread - you don't have a real answer so you just try to wear down the argument.

Suffice to say we can end this now - Don't attack the devs. You did that, don't do it again. OS is a privately run forum - if you don't care for that, please visit another gaming from, or the official game form at www.theshownation.com

Thanks.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

[Spokker]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

Is the ps4.5 allowed to be discussed here? I saw a thread related to it closed but I don't know if it was closed for ps4.5 discussion or juttering discussion or something else.

Now that the rumors are way more credible, I'd like to discuss and speculate what it might mean for MLB 17.

[bcruise]

Re: That time again (Immediate Bans Effective, Please Read)

Is the ps4.5 allowed to be discussed here? I saw a thread related to it closed but I don't know if it was closed for ps4.5 discussion or juttering discussion or something else.

Now that the rumors are way more credible, I'd like to discuss and speculate what it might mean for MLB 17.

I think it was closed for the extremely misleading thread title, myself. Nothing about MLB 17 in the title, and I really don't think, even if this does come out in October, that SCEA SD would have any reason to patch NEO functionality into 16.

Beyond that...I dunno, I agree it's more credible now that two major gaming media outlets are reporting it, but it's still rumor until Sony announces.