MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Off the top of my head
Cubs for Happ as the headliner
Nats, but I don't think they'd give you Robles
Texas would probably give you Gallo plus
Past that it will depend in who is competing, what their bullpen looks like and if anyone lost a closer to injury
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Comment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
You could get a pitching prospect that's a year or two away but I doubt anyone trades for their rotation for him.
TDoyle made a good suggestion I'm just not sure they have the depth to after dealing away Giolito and Lopez this off-season
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appLast edited by GamecocksLaw17; 04-08-2017, 08:12 PM.Comment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Ruiz doesn't have that much value. He's be a throw in part to an Archer deal. Like an Albies/Acuna plus Allard plus something then having Ruiz as the last throw in piece
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Probably not. It's counterintuitive for a competing team to add a closer by weakening their MLB rotation
You could get a pitching prospect that's a year or two away but I doubt anyone trades for their rotation for him.
TDoyle made a good suggestion I'm just not sure they have the depth to after dealing away Giolito and Lopez this off-season
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
I run 2 franchises, one for fun (fair but I don't care much about realism) and another as 'real' as I can get. The real franchise is my O's so in every trade I do for them, I look for feedback to keep me honest. That being said, I need an athletic OF in the worst way. I think J. Marisnick is someone I can target legitimately so...
O's - J. Marisnick (athletic, glove first 4th OF with 2 years of club control left)
Astros - H. Harvey (injury prone SP former 1st round pick #3 in my farm)
Can I get this done? I can add another farm arm on my side if needed. If not...suggestions? I know its not the level of trade we normally talk about but in this scenario, I'm assuming an open bidding market and what other clubs would offer for the player I want. We're getting close to rosters dropping and I'd like to get setup and play 1 game before I have to turn in for the night. Adding a player means I would need to cut/move someone from the MLB roster."for love of the game" - B. ChapelComment
-
"for love of the game" - B. ChapelComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
I run 2 franchises, one for fun (fair but I don't care much about realism) and another as 'real' as I can get. The real franchise is my O's so in every trade I do for them, I look for feedback to keep me honest. That being said, I need an athletic OF in the worst way. I think J. Marisnick is someone I can target legitimately so...
O's - J. Marisnick (athletic, glove first 4th OF with 2 years of club control left)
Astros - H. Harvey (injury prone SP former 1st round pick #3 in my farm)
Can I get this done? I can add another farm arm on my side if needed. If not...suggestions? I know its not the level of trade we normally talk about but in this scenario, I'm assuming an open bidding market and what other clubs would offer for the player I want. We're getting close to rosters dropping and I'd like to get setup and play 1 game before I have to turn in for the night. Adding a player means I would need to cut/move someone from the MLB roster.Comment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
He actually made the Rays opening day roster. That means I would have to tax myself for the trade within the division. I may cry if I have to pay any tax for P. Bourjois. Great suggestion though, that's the kind of direction I'm looking to go in. I have a few little pieces that I think I can turn into someone for the next 2-3 years in a win-now mode."for love of the game" - B. ChapelComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
He actually made the Rays opening day roster. That means I would have to tax myself for the trade within the division. I may cry if I have to pay any tax for P. Bourjois. Great suggestion though, that's the kind of direction I'm looking to go in. I have a few little pieces that I think I can turn into someone for the next 2-3 years in a win-now mode.Comment
-
Comment
Comment