Number Crunchers, what's a good /ave/ poor SLG etc..

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • johnnydrum
    Pro
    • Sep 2009
    • 737

    #1

    Number Crunchers, what's a good /ave/ poor SLG etc..

    Hello all.
    Realtivley new to MLB.
    Wanting to grasp the stats more.
    Went to a great site (fangraphs) which graded and quantified stats ie: AVR / OBP with a handy guide of....

    Great
    Above Average
    Average
    Below Average
    Poor

    But they didn't give a grade for SLG, OPS+, WHIP etc..
    Could any one help.
    Thank you very much
  • Bartolo Colon
    MVP
    • Mar 2015
    • 1234

    #2
    Re: Number Crunchers, what's a good /ave/ poor SLG etc..

    Anyone one with a WHIP around 1.15 would be classified as good.

    A WHIP under 1.00 is elite

    A WHIP from 1.25 - 1.35 is around average

    However, it is also dependent on the ballpark... a pitcher for the Rockies who makes all their home starts in Colorado and has a 1.15 WHIP would be a great ratio for them.

    OPS+: 100 is league average.

    Anytime you see the “+” it is ballpark, era, and league adjusted. 110 is quite good, while 90 would be below average.

    SLG: .440 is probably around average. Over .500 is definitely excellent. Under .400 is dreadful.

    However, like WHIP, the ballpark a player calls home is a huge factor. A player for the Royals who slugs
    .455 is pretty good.

    Hope this helps

    Comment

    • johnnydrum
      Pro
      • Sep 2009
      • 737

      #3
      Re: Number Crunchers, what's a good /ave/ poor SLG etc..

      Thank you so much for that.
      There's a lot to "grasp" in the MLB stats.... Lol
      I had studied what they " meant" but was havibg difficulty 'value ing " (what was good etc)

      Comment

      • Ed21
        Rookie
        • Aug 2009
        • 372

        #4
        Re: Number Crunchers, what's a good /ave/ poor SLG etc..

        I would say it depends on position as well.

        A 1B who slugs .450 is probably considered average/slightly below average, whereas a SS who slugs .450 would be considered pretty good.

        I would take the more premium defensive positions (SS, C, CF) and give them a bit more leeway in regards to what you think is a good slugging percentage etc., especially if they play good defense.

        Comment

        Working...