We can agree to disagree. I've had this conversation a million times with other baseball fans over the years. I prefer the no DH game of baseball over the game that features a DH. I always will.
I already don't think pitchers getting hurt at the plate happens frequently enough for me to personally care about it.
The DH leads to 1 additional run for every 100 innings played, so I don't really care for it from an offensive standpoint.
NL teams average between 3x to 4x as many pinch type substitutions per year than AL teams do.
I've never once seen a game featuring a DH where the opposing team walked a hitter to face a pitcher.
I've never once seen a game featuring the DH where a manager pulls a pitcher who was dealing so they could try and score and hope the pen holds on.
I value that brand of baseball more than you and others do. Neither side is right. Neither side is wrong. I don't think you're wrong, stupid, or whatever because you prefer to see the DH hit. I don't find you silly for not caring about those managerial decisions.
You simply value different things in the sport than I do. The situations I put forth above may not happen every single night, but they happen frequently enough that I don't want to see them go. I enjoy those moments significantly more when they do occur than I enjoy watching a game featuring the DH. Even if the DH is an Ortiz type, I'd rather watch a game with no DH and force Ortiz to play the field and force managers to use their bench throughout the game when needed. Other people would rather the pitchers pitch, the hitters hit, and leave it at that.
That's simply not me. You play, you hit. Thats me.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Comment