Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
Prospect ratings.
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Prospect ratings.
Are there any prospects that you all think are either too low or too high in regards to ratings? I was looking through the Cubs prospects and their top guy, Brennan Davis, is only rated at 60. He has A potential and is expected to make his Major League debut this year, but it may be hard to do so in The Show until he’s rated at least in the 70’s.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsTags: None -
Re: Prospect ratings.
Ezequiel Tovar, Rockies SS, has D potential. He already plays big league level defense and his bat has started coming around. In A/A+ last year, he slashed .287/.322/.475 with 15 homers and 30 doubles. In spring training this year he hit over .500 in 20 plate appearances with 3 homers and 2 doubles.
If his bat continues to progress like this, he could be the Rockies starting SS next season at 21 years old. At least deserving of B potential. -
Re: Prospect ratings.
Are there any prospects that you all think are either too low or too high in regards to ratings? I was looking through the Cubs prospects and their top guy, Brennan Davis, is only rated at 60. He has A potential and is expected to make his Major League debut this year, but it may be hard to do so in The Show until he’s rated at least in the 70’s.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsComment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
I don’t usually make ratings changes, but I might make an exception. Especially considering he’s just about the only decent prospect on the Cubs.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsComment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
My impression of the "community" or "full minors" players last year was some teams got a lot of love and some got nothing.
It seemed like the people making the rosters were biased in the direction of their favorite team.
Just my impression from looking at the roster.≡Comment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
Yup and those full minor rosters always have higher potential ratings which really screw up progression in the game. It doesn’t help also that I don’t think any d potential prospects can ever break out and increase their potentialComment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
I'd wait till after a sds opening day roster and see if any of it changes. Not counting on it, but it's possible for some changes especially if the club keeps the prospect on mlb roster.Really wish sports games played to ratings!
Only thing SIM about sports games now, are the team name and players
CFB 25 The absolute GOAT!!!
MLB 23 FOREVER 20 is better, 23 just for Guardians
Madden get rid of the extras (SS/XF, HFA, media, scenarios, game plan) or turn them down considerably.Comment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
Are there any prospects that you all think are either too low or too high in regards to ratings? I was looking through the Cubs prospects and their top guy, Brennan Davis, is only rated at 60. He has A potential and is expected to make his Major League debut this year, but it may be hard to do so in The Show until he’s rated at least in the 70’s.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
Sent from my SM-G930VL using Operation Sports mobile appChicago Cubs
Michigan Wolverines
Thanks Peyton. #18Comment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
For the Padres, at the SS position they either need to make CJ Abrams better or make Jackson Merrill lower because he should not be rated higher than CJ who's one of the top prospects in all baseball and is almost a lock for the opening day roster at this point.Comment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
Do they typically make changes to the prospect ratings in updates? I’ve never paid attention to that. I’ll probably just go through the top 100 MLB guys and at least make sure they have respectable ratings. Nothing crazy, but I’ll probably take Brennan Davis, who is the number 15 overall MLB prospect, and move him from a 60 to maybe a 70 at most.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsComment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
I never hesitate to edit guys so that they match my (novice) understanding of their skill set. I don’t think it makes much difference, considering there’s so much (rightly-placed) variance in potential performance, where anyone with a rating above 60 can theoretically perform statistically step-in-step with a player rated 20 and 30 points higher.
I hit .223 with Miggy enough times to know that the difference between 90 contact and 50 contact is between the ears. If you’re dialed in at the plate you can rake with anyone, and at the end of the day it almost doesn’t even matter what a guy is rated so long as his rating matches what you know and understand about him.
Not really what you’re asking, I know, but offering the friendly opinion that it hardly matters at all, you can rate guys whatever you want, because it makes the game better when you do.Just one man’s opinion.
I don’t actually care about any of this.Comment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
I like this thread as it makes editing prospect potentials easier for teams I'm not that familiar with. As for Brennan Davis, ZIPS projects Josh Jung Jung and Davis with similar power profiles, so I upped Davis' power stats to the same level as Jung -- puts him at 65 overall.
Do they typically make changes to the prospect ratings in updates? I’ve never paid attention to that. I’ll probably just go through the top 100 MLB guys and at least make sure they have respectable ratings. Nothing crazy, but I’ll probably take Brennan Davis, who is the number 15 overall MLB prospect, and move him from a 60 to maybe a 70 at most.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsComment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
Are there any prospects that you all think are either too low or too high in regards to ratings? I was looking through the Cubs prospects and their top guy, Brennan Davis, is only rated at 60. He has A potential and is expected to make his Major League debut this year, but it may be hard to do so in The Show until he’s rated at least in the 70’s.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsComment
-
Re: Prospect ratings.
Look, man. Our team sucks and we only have one legitimate prospect. We want him to be good at least. Haha.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsComment
Comment