Pitchers should not be rated same as position players. RE 3 year player rated

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ltw0303cavs
    MVP
    • Sep 2006
    • 1052

    #1

    Pitchers should not be rated same as position players. RE 3 year player rated

    K/9 is not correctly rated. Pitchers to go three years healthy is rare now, so I think their last season should have bigger weight. Luis Castillo K/9 should not be in 60s. Morton was top ten in K/9 for SP, 61 ? If you are double digit k9 you should be 80 minimum. You can’t rate a RP K per 9 to SP K9 imo
  • ripwalk
    Pro
    • May 2009
    • 531

    #2
    Re: Pitchers should not be rated same as position players. RE 3 year player rated

    Originally posted by countryboy
    K/9 has nothing to do with strikeouts as an attribute but rather contact/swings and misses by a batter against a pitcher




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Umm, nothing to do with strikeouts ?

    If it impacts how often batters swing and miss …. It impacts how often they strikeout, since not making contact with the ball is kind of part of striking out.

    Comment

    • MiracleMet718
      Pro
      • Apr 2016
      • 2027

      #3
      Re: Pitchers should not be rated same as position players. RE 3 year player rated

      Originally posted by ltw0303cavs
      K/9 is not correctly rated. Pitchers to go three years healthy is rare now, so I think their last season should have bigger weight. Luis Castillo K/9 should not be in 60s. Morton was top ten in K/9 for SP, 61 ? If you are double digit k9 you should be 80 minimum. You can’t rate a RP K per 9 to SP K9 imo
      I think the K/9 is actually screwed up due to the DD roster. A lot of the top K guys are in the 70s because of it. I always change them based on the actual K/9 rankings and get more realistic K totals in franchise.

      Comment

      Working...