MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • masterkembo
    Rookie
    • Aug 2008
    • 499

    #46
    Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

    Originally posted by k_bassuka
    It’s still a possibility and if a pitcher goes out there and win 24+ games in a year with a low ERA will win it unless someone has a B.Bonds type of year and break the single season HR record. It’s true that pitchers rarely win it but at least have the opportunity to do so, unlike in the most realistic game ever. So what’s the problem with <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com</st1:City>RoY award then? Any other excuses why they can’t win it.
    <O

    Quit making excuses for a broken part of the game.
    2002: Randy Johnson, 24 W, 5L, 2.32ERA, 260 Innings, 334, SO.

    That seems to meet your MVP requirements for a pitcher.

    MPV: Barry Bonds with 46 Homeruns and 110RBIs which certainly isn't a 'homerun record breaking' season.

    1996: John Smoltz, 24 W, 8L, 2.94ERA, 253.2 Innings, 276 SO.

    MVP: Ken Camaniti - 40 Homeruns, 130 RBIs (neither recrod breaking; in fact neither even lead the league)

    1999: Pedro Martinez, 23W, 4L, 2.07ERA, 213.1 Innings, 313 SO.

    MVP: Ivan Rodriguez, 35 Homeruns, 113 RBI (neither league leading)

    All three of those pitchers meet your MVP criteria, yet none of them won the MVP, and the guys that did win certainly did not have record breaking stats.

    So, is it broken when a pitcher doesn't win MVP in the game?? Absolutely not! Considering a pitcher hasn't won the MVP in 16 seasons IRL, and there has been pitchers that have had big seasons since then, and they haven't won the MVP, I think it's fair that pitchers haven't won the MVP in your season(s).

    Edit: Pedro was the only of those 3 guys that was even in the top 3 in voting. Randy Johnson finished 7th in voting in his 24 win season.
    Last edited by masterkembo; 04-06-2009, 01:52 PM.

    Comment

    • choadler
      MVP
      • Feb 2004
      • 2001

      #47
      Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

      Wow, I guess that put that argument to rest about pitchers and MVP...Nice post masterkembo.

      Funny how people's perceptions and what they feel is realistic and not realistic is so far off.

      Comment

      • k_bassuka
        Rookie
        • Jul 2008
        • 140

        #48
        Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

        Originally posted by masterkembo
        2002: Randy Johnson, 24 W, 5L, 2.32ERA, 260 Innings, 334, SO.

        That seems to meet your MVP requirements for a pitcher.

        MPV: Barry Bonds with 46 Homeruns and 110RBIs which certainly isn't a 'homerun record breaking' season.

        1996: John Smoltz, 24 W, 8L, 2.94ERA, 253.2 Innings, 276 SO.

        MVP: Ken Camaniti - 40 Homeruns, 130 RBIs (neither recrod breaking; in fact neither even lead the league)

        1999: Pedro Martinez, 23W, 4L, 2.07ERA, 213.1 Innings, 313 SO.

        MVP: Ivan Rodriguez, 35 Homeruns, 113 RBI (neither league leading)

        All three of those pitchers meet your MVP criteria, yet none of them won the MVP, and the guys that did win certainly did not have record breaking stats.

        So, is it broken when a pitcher doesn't win MVP in the game?? Absolutely not! Considering a pitcher hasn't won the MVP in 16 seasons IRL, and there has been pitchers that have had big seasons since then, and they haven't won the MVP, I think it's fair that pitchers haven't won the MVP in your season(s).

        Edit: Pedro was the only of those 3 guys that was even in the top 3 in voting. Randy Johnson finished 7th in voting in his 24 win season.

        1996: Smoltz put up great stats playing for a great team maybe the best in the majors; they had the best pitching staff by far.<O
        <O
        Caminiti took an average at best team to the playoffs, and put up great numbers
        .326 BA 40 HR 79 XBH 110 R 130 RBI 11 SB
        <O
        1999: Pedro should’ve won the award if you ask me, the only reason he didn’t is because some writers didn’t like him and some refuse to give their MVP vote to a pitcher, Pudge didn’t help by having one of the better seasons by a catcher offensively (rare by a catcher at the time) and defensively. If this would’ve happened after a Blo Soxs WS he would’ve won it.
        <O
        2002: AZ had 2 pitchers that won 20+ games and they also had a great team and it showed by winning the WS.
        <O
        Bonds continue his dominance, after hitting 73 the year prior he was on track to break that record, until that coach decided it was best to walk him even with bases loaded than to pitch to him. That’s why he didn’t hit more HR and still had one of the better seasons by a hitter.
        .370 BA 46 HR 79 XBH 117 R 110 RBI 198 BB
        <O
        He took a bad team and had them competing with the more talented AZ. He clearly was more important to his team than RJ. And voters believed that if they had pitched to him he would’ve beaten the 73 mark.
        <O
        But you made my point for me those pitchers were in the MVP discussion those years and that doesn’t happen in this game, you can win 25 heck even 40 games playing for the Pirates and have no shot at winning the MVP, while on real life it would be a no brainer.
        <O
        P.S. this is baseball, almost anything it’s possible too bad that the developers didn’t get the memo.

        Comment

        • k_bassuka
          Rookie
          • Jul 2008
          • 140

          #49
          Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

          How about RoY award, whats the excuse there?

          Comment

          Working...