Completely agree. I think the Cards should easily be top 8, since it's essentially the same team that won 92 games last year. There is no way the Blue Jays or Braves did enough to be ranked higher than the Cards. It's not a big deal, just surprising to see a team favored to win the NL Central put in the bottom half of the rankings.
MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings and Explanation
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
Completely agree. I think the Cards should easily be top 8, since it's essentially the same team that won 92 games last year. There is no way the Blue Jays or Braves did enough to be ranked higher than the Cards. It's not a big deal, just surprising to see a team favored to win the NL Central put in the bottom half of the rankings. -
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
We just have to hope Glaus gets back to being the 35 homerun guy he was in the past and Heyward is a stud from day one. We have to hope McLouth is the player he was a couple of years ago. We have to hope Chipper stays healthy.
Like I said we have a lot of what if's, it stinks but it is what it is.Comment
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
Well this is the team we've got, unless Damon signs with us that is and he's not going to bring a lot of power with him.
We just have to hope Glaus gets back to being the 35 homerun guy he was in the past and Heyward is a stud from day one. We have to hope McLouth is the player he was a couple of years ago. We have to hope Chipper stays healthy.
Like I said we have a lot of what if's, it stinks but it is what it is.Comment
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
Please tell me Matt Holliday was not yet on the Cardinals roster...Comment
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
My man Russell, I want to thank you first and foremost for your post. I hope that you continue your tradition of offering up the best in their position via screen shots, like you did last year.Comment
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
LOLComment
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
Why are the Indians fans crying? Who do they have worth anything (that isn't a prospect) besides Sizemore & Choo?Originally posted by Gibson88Anyone who asked for an ETA is not being Master of their Domain.
It's hard though...especially when I got my neighbor playing their franchise across the street...maybe I will occupy myself with Glamore Magazine.Comment
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
I'm I the only Braves fan that remembers we have McCann?Comment
-
PSN: OverPar8Comment
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
As much as I love my Dodgers... 4th is pretty generous considering their quiet offseason.
Overall, Defense, Pitching, Batting <o></o>
Dodgers--4<sup>th</sup>, 4<sup>th</sup>, 2<sup>nd</sup>, 10<sup>th</sup>
Whatever though. Bring on the NL West in Franchise!Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings
I don't agree with the Red Sox offense being rated higher than the Phillies offense.
The Red Sox certainly have better pitching...and slightly better defense...but I think the Phillies definitely have the better lineup.
Also, the Giants' pitching is better than 13th. It should probably be top 5 or 6.Last edited by bk7987; 02-18-2010, 04:47 PM.Comment
Comment