MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings and Explanation

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • metsman8669
    Banned
    • Jan 2010
    • 423

    #76
    Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

    Originally posted by jdr4693
    How the HELL do the Mets have better pitching than the Nationals? Even Mets fans I know admit we atleast have a better rotation than them (from top to bottom) Lannan, Marquis, Wang, Zimmermann, Strasburg that beats Santana and the rest is junk IMO
    No it doesn't.

    You have two sure starters in Lannan and Marquis in which you know what you're gonna get. And it's not much more than league average/big innings.

    Believe me...the Mets have question marks after Santana, but the ace he is pushes them over the top in that regard.

    It's fun to debate...but it's just video game rankinigs.

    Comment

    • Proff56
      Pro
      • Mar 2003
      • 579

      #77
      Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

      I am sure these will change as roster updates are made. So if your team is better than you think they should show it during the season.

      Comment

      • metsman8669
        Banned
        • Jan 2010
        • 423

        #78
        Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

        To me, this isn't a "my team is better than your team" type of thread...but more a question of how SCEA came up with the rankings.

        I love baseball talk so to me...this is great.

        Comment

        • tyler289
          MVP
          • Jul 2006
          • 2933

          #79
          Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

          Originally posted by jdr4693
          How the HELL do the Mets have better pitching than the Nationals? Even Mets fans I know admit we atleast have a better rotation than them (from top to bottom) Lannan, Marquis, Wang, Zimmermann, Strasburg that beats Santana and the rest is junk IMO
          Zimmermann had TJ surgery and probably won't pitch this year. Strasburg won't be in the rotation to start the year unless he's nasty in spring training.

          Opening day is probably going to be:

          Lannan
          Marquis
          Olsen
          Stammen
          Balester

          That doesn't scare a lot of lineups. I don't even know who the Mets have other than Santana, but few teams have a worse staff than the Nats.

          Comment

          • omfgitsgod!
            Banned
            • Feb 2010
            • 63

            #80
            Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

            St.Louis 16th overall?
            someone please explain this one

            Comment

            • fenwaymike
              Rookie
              • Feb 2010
              • 126

              #81
              Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

              Maybe it is because the Cards hired a hitting coach who could only hit .260 while on steroids :-)

              Comment

              • BKBond007
                Banned
                • Feb 2010
                • 118

                #82
                Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                Originally posted by jdr4693
                How the HELL do the Mets have better pitching than the Nationals? Even Mets fans I know admit we atleast have a better rotation than them (from top to bottom) Lannan, Marquis, Wang, Zimmermann, Strasburg that beats Santana and the rest is junk IMO
                ok so Strasberg has never pitched in the majors, Wang hasnt pitched well in some time and Zimmerman is only in his second year..may have a sophomore jinx..if a 3-5 is considered a good first year ( not debating) and lets hope that Marquis does what he did when he had good hitting ball clubs behind him..so I can see how that rotation may be looked at as maybe not great..even compared to the Mets and heck Im a jays fan..maybe a Phillies fan now

                Comment

                • metsman8669
                  Banned
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 423

                  #83
                  Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                  Originally posted by BKBond007
                  ok so Strasberg has never pitched in the majors, Wang hasnt pitched well in some time and Zimmerman is only in his second year..may have a sophomore jinx..if a 3-5 is considered a good first year ( not debating) and lets hope that Marquis does what he did when he had good hitting ball clubs behind him..so I can see how that rotation may be looked at as maybe not great..even compared to the Mets and heck Im a jays fan..maybe a Phillies fan now
                  Nats have solid potential in the rotation.

                  As a Mets fan I'm biased but I think it's fairly objective when I say that their rotation could be decent based on three issues:

                  1) they have an unqualified ace
                  2) unless an older guy wins the 5th starters role, Santana is the only starter over 30 (will be 32 in a few weeks)
                  3) all of the pitchers, save a fifth starter, have experienced pretty damn successful seasons the over the last few years

                  Of course...they've all experienced injury issues except Pelfrey, who was awful from June onward last year. We'll just have to see...spring makes us all optimists so I'm going to just enjoy watching the boys back out on the field!

                  Comment

                  • rbaker1979
                    Rookie
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 133

                    #84
                    Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                    The Cardinals are severely underrated, but it'll just make it that much more satisfying when I whip the 93% of people who play as nothing but Yanks/Sox with a 16th ranked team

                    Comment

                    • BKBond007
                      Banned
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 118

                      #85
                      Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                      Originally posted by metsman8669
                      Nats have solid potential in the rotation.

                      As a Mets fan I'm biased but I think it's fairly objective when I say that their rotation could be decent based on three issues:

                      1) they have an unqualified ace
                      2) unless an older guy wins the 5th starters role, Santana is the only starter over 30 (will be 32 in a few weeks)
                      3) all of the pitchers, save a fifth starter, have experienced pretty damn successful seasons the over the last few years

                      Of course...they've all experienced injury issues except Pelfrey, who was awful from June onward last year. We'll just have to see...spring makes us all optimists so I'm going to just enjoy watching the boys back out on the field!
                      I was actually agreeing with the mets fans..

                      Comment

                      • pezone
                        Rookie
                        • May 2008
                        • 402

                        #86
                        Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                        wow...Mariners 19th in pitching??

                        Comment

                        • jdr4693
                          Pro
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 726

                          #87
                          Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                          Marquis was an all star at one point and Wang has something to prove.. Strasburg will play in the bigs this season, but your right it won't be on opening day... I still think they have more in that department than those Metropolitan's

                          Comment

                          • omfgitsgod!
                            Banned
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 63

                            #88
                            Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                            Originally posted by fenwaymike
                            Maybe it is because the Cards hired a hitting coach who could only hit .260 while on steroids :-)
                            LOL yes. But really, how does a team with Pujols, Holliday, Wainwright, Carpenter, and two great minds in La Russa and Duncan only get 16th?

                            behind the Blue Jays?

                            Comment

                            • kevjones
                              Rookie
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 7

                              #89
                              Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                              The Mariners have the best defensive in my opinion, with one of the largest outfield in the game to cover. Also 19th in pitching? King Felix, Cliff Lee, and Aardsma warrant a much higher rating. Plus Safeco is a great pitchers park.

                              That being said, our offense may be even worse than 22nd...

                              Comment

                              • omfgitsgod!
                                Banned
                                • Feb 2010
                                • 63

                                #90
                                Re: MLB '10: The Show Official Team Ratings

                                Originally posted by pezone
                                wow...Mariners 19th in pitching??
                                agreed here too. M's should be in the top ten

                                Comment

                                Working...