Histrocial seasons

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lhslancers
    Banned
    • Nov 2011
    • 3589

    #16
    Re: Histrocial seasons

    The guys who do the historical rosters do a good job. I will be interested to see what they can do on the PS4 with a more robust face editor and an increased library of stances swings and pitching deliveries.

    Comment

    • loganmorrison1
      Rookie
      • Aug 2010
      • 246

      #17
      Re: Histrocial seasons

      I'm glad I asked the question, because I always thought the MLBPA owned the rights to former players. Now that I know the reality, it would impossible for SCEA to create a historical roster and turn a profit. So now we really need a franchise editor to correctly replicate a historical season. I definitely would put that on my wish list for next year. Also would love a player editor that allows us to enter stats for a player which SCEA can create into their player rating system.

      Comment

      • Gameboy 11
        Rookie
        • Jan 2013
        • 13

        #18
        Re: Histrocial seasons

        So, 30 years from now, could The Show upload their 2013 rosters for use in the "new game"?

        Comment

        • CubsHOF
          Banned
          • Mar 2009
          • 356

          #19
          Re: Histrocial seasons

          Originally posted by Gameboy 11
          So, 30 years from now, could The Show upload their 2013 rosters for use in the "new game"?
          Nope, the rights for those players would have expired by then. Let's say Lance Berkman retires after the 2013 season, he would no longer be a part of the MLBPA and they could not include him in the 2014 game unless they reached a separate agreement with just him.

          Comment

          • jpup
            MVP
            • Feb 2003
            • 4571

            #20
            Re: Histrocial seasons

            They need to add a gameface type editor. That would solve a lot.
            NFL: Tennessee Titans
            MLB: Cincinnati Reds

            Comment

            • dingleberryfinn
              Banned
              • May 2010
              • 1736

              #21
              Re: Histrocial seasons

              Originally posted by loganmorrison1
              Also would love a player editor that allows us to enter stats for a player which SCEA can create into their player rating system.
              Excellent idea!

              Comment

              • TonyDanzaFan
                Banned
                • Mar 2012
                • 594

                #22
                Re: Histrocial seasons

                I would totally be for them including classic players and a classic all star team (ala MVP 05 and Madden 13). Obviously they can't go the basketball 2k route because of how few bball players are on a team, but including legends like Aaron andMays and Mantle and Ruth would be cool. MVP 05 did it so I don't see why The SHow couldn't do it.

                Comment

                • Perfect Zero
                  1B, OF
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 4012

                  #23
                  Re: Histrocial seasons

                  Originally posted by TonyDanzaFan
                  I would totally be for them including classic players and a classic all star team (ala MVP 05 and Madden 13). Obviously they can't go the basketball 2k route because of how few bball players are on a team, but including legends like Aaron andMays and Mantle and Ruth would be cool. MVP 05 did it so I don't see why The SHow couldn't do it.
                  There is an OS roster that has the greatest players for individual teams. While some choices are wrong (Wilson on the Rangers, Ryan on the Angels), it's a very good set.

                  Of course, the reason why SCEA doesn't do it is because of the licensing agreements that they would have to go through.
                  Rangers - Cowboys - Aggies - Stars - Mavericks

                  Comment

                  • artdog5110
                    Rookie
                    • May 2007
                    • 337

                    #24
                    Re: Histrocial seasons

                    I think it would be great if they would either include old schedules, or follow up on Knights idea of allowing you to edit your leagues for a season. The people who do roster edits do do a great job and trust me, it is a very time consuming procedure. I did it for a couple of years and though i never was confident enough to post, I liked the job I did. (Paticularly proud of my Jose Rijo). Including old schedules would probaly drain a lot of memory and other rescources, but if you could edit your league, even if you had to use a computer generated schedule, that would be just as cool. Then to avoid the rights fees just keep as it is now, w/ players you, (or a roster modifier) can modify, and it would be awesome. Still and I am only speaking for myself on this, the lack of uni options and stances and windups, and stadiums are to big of an issue for me to overcome. For example I started a '94 replay season w/ Knights roster. Roster was great, but I can't edit my league, which unto itself isn't the worst thing, but I can't use retired #'s, I can't use the proper uniform for the Nats (Expos,) or reds, the teams i wanted to play, and I had to use Rogers stadium for Riverfront, 3Rivers etc., and the Rays stadium for Olympic and the Astrodome.
                    Plus though the stances and wind ups isn't the issue it would be for a '70's roster ( when pitchers had more distinct and funky windups), it is still a bit of an issue. No way you are replicating Danny Jackson's wind up on the Show. I know all the current players need their exact motions and stances, but many of the generics really run together, and it seems like you could work 20 or so extra wind ups and stances each into the game. I know the stadium rights are in issue, but maybe instead of fake minor league stadiums, some fake stadiums with astro turf and pillars and bad sight lines that would make it easier to pretend. I'm not really trying to complain about the game, just from the vantage point of a gamer who just wants to do classics, I don't see a reason to buy this year. I get bored playing a current season, and there is to much pretending for me to do at my age.
                    Once again i know I'll be missing out on a great game, the developers always come through for us on that end, but for the first time since before The Show was actually The Show, I'm going to sit this one out. p.s. Sorry for the rant, i wasn't trying to say "Get Out of my yard!" just trying to put my two cents in and it got away from me. So sorry!
                    Last edited by artdog5110; 01-28-2013, 07:02 PM. Reason: spelling and punctuation

                    Comment

                    Working...