MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MLB Bob
    MVP
    • Jan 2011
    • 1008

    #331
    Re: MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

    Originally posted by bkrich83
    Never once did I state or imply that Jays fans or anyone knew nothing. I did find it absurd that they thought being top 5 was too low for a team coming off 73 wins. They added some pieces to the puzzle, but lets stay near reality. Top 5, means you are rated very very high.
    And I have never disagreed and have had the comment directed at me, so I guess I dont understand. And you werent the only person...and all those things were said

    And reality in a video game? the digital version of these teams is not identical to the real life parts, so to say its not reality..no crap...we dont even know the formula, it is what the team is on paper and digital teams dont have to prove themselves.
    Last edited by MLB Bob; 02-24-2013, 11:25 PM.

    Comment

    • bkrich83
      Has Been
      • Jul 2002
      • 71574

      #332
      Re: MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

      Originally posted by MLB Bob
      And I have never disagreed and have had the comment directed at me, so I guess I dont understand. And you werent the only person...and all those things were said
      I guess I am missing your point, other than fans of your favorite team because of their actions were put in a bad light on an internet forum.
      Tracking my NCAA Coach Career

      Comment

      • Majingir
        Moderator
        • Apr 2005
        • 47439

        #333
        Re: MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

        Originally posted by bkrich83
        I did find it absurd that they thought being top 5 was too low for a team coming off 73 wins. They added some pieces to the puzzle, but lets stay near reality. Top 5, means you are rated very very high.
        Like I've said many times, it wasn't the 2012 Jays who finished with 73 wins, it was the Vegas AAA team that finished with 73 wins since majority of Jays roster was injured for most of season.

        While we'll have to wait until September to see if Jays are top 5 team, ON PAPER, they're a team around top 5. The actual 2012 Jays roster(the one with a healthy Bautista,JP,Lawrie,Morrow among others) was ON PAPER supposed to be a team around the 10th spot in the league.

        If the Jays had a healthy 2012 roster and Bautista,Lawrie,JP played 140+ games each and their rotation had 3-4 pitchers who each had 25+ starts, and they finished with 73 wins, then I'd agree that 5th place even after all those moves, would be way too high for Jays, but that wasn't the case.

        Comment

        • bkrich83
          Has Been
          • Jul 2002
          • 71574

          #334
          Re: MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

          Originally posted by Majingir
          Like I've said many times, it wasn't the 2012 Jays who finished with 73 wins, it was the Vegas AAA team that finished with 73 wins since majority of Jays roster was injured for most of season.

          While we'll have to wait until September to see if Jays are top 5 team, ON PAPER, they're a team around top 5. The actual 2012 Jays roster(the one with a healthy Bautista,JP,Lawrie,Morrow among others) was ON PAPER supposed to be a team around the 10th spot in the league.

          If the Jays had a healthy 2012 roster and Bautista,Lawrie,JP played 140+ games each and their rotation had 3-4 pitchers who each had 25+ starts, and they finished with 73 wins, then I'd agree that 5th place even after all those moves, would be way too high for Jays, but that wasn't the case.
          Saying they are a top 5 team on paper, is a stretch, to say the very least. But I get it. However that's not the point, Jays fan complaining it's too low? I mean I know Jays fans are excited, and I know that team has been a complete non factor for 20 years almost, but come on. Is it that hard to stay a little bit grounded?
          Last edited by bkrich83; 02-24-2013, 11:51 PM.
          Tracking my NCAA Coach Career

          Comment

          • Lovesports
            Rookie
            • Jul 2011
            • 469

            #335
            Originally posted by MLB Bob
            Team errors? The extension of player errors and fielding percentage?
            In a video game? I think team errors and field % is a good indicator.

            Comment

            • Lovesports
              Rookie
              • Jul 2011
              • 469

              #336
              Originally posted by ParisB
              That is like saying Freddy Sanchez is a better hitter than Albert Pujols because he had a higher batting average.
              Well, if that was the case then technically that would make him a better hitter lol. Better pkayer? No. Better hitter? Yes. Good try though. Besides, team errors and team field % are very important imo

              Comment

              • MLB Bob
                MVP
                • Jan 2011
                • 1008

                #337
                Re: MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

                I guess thats whats behind this, people value stats differently. And no one is wrong because they are giving an opinion. And we still dont know what stats and what percentage SCEA values to make their ratings

                Comment

                • OneTonneBaby
                  Rookie
                  • Apr 2012
                  • 170

                  #338
                  Re: MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

                  Not gonna read 34 pages but the ratings are a real head scratcher.

                  Also dont understand how Rays are 15th and Arizona is 14th considering

                  Arizona are 8 places higher in hitting
                  Rays are 10 places higher in pitching
                  Rays are 13 places higher in defence

                  So overall Rays 14 places higher than arizona...but are 1 place behind them in overall rankings?

                  Comment

                  • MrOldboy
                    MVP
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 2653

                    #339
                    Re: MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

                    Originally posted by OneTonneBaby
                    Not gonna read 34 pages but the ratings are a real head scratcher.

                    Also dont understand how Rays are 15th and Arizona is 14th considering

                    Arizona are 8 places higher in hitting
                    Rays are 10 places higher in pitching
                    Rays are 13 places higher in defence

                    So overall Rays 14 places higher than arizona...but are 1 place behind them in overall rankings?
                    The overall rating seems to take hitting into account more that pitching or defense. Look at the Tigers. It makes sense if you take that into account that Arizona is rated higher in hitting. Maybe not to you, but to the game it makes sense.

                    Comment

                    • Chairman7w
                      MVP
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 1490

                      #340
                      Originally posted by DodgerFanatic2K3
                      Yep they played the best baseball when it counted but are still nowhere near the best overall team which is what the ratings factor in
                      Wow - Giants get no love. That's okay, they'll be sitting there polishing their rings in the shadow of their two recent World Championship trophies while the Yankees and Braves pound their chest about their ratings.... LoL

                      Comment

                      • Chairman7w
                        MVP
                        • Mar 2006
                        • 1490

                        #341
                        Originally posted by Hockeynut99
                        The Giants should be higher if they had a true chemistry rating. Maybe next year. ha
                        This right here. Chemistry is HUGE in baseball. I've been watching a looooong time (I'm old) and I don't know if I've ever seen a team with the kind of chemistry the Giants had last year. Maybe the '79 Pirates.

                        Comment

                        • jseward92
                          Pro
                          • Mar 2011
                          • 854

                          #342
                          Glad to see three teams below the Cubs!

                          Comment

                          • R0ver
                            Rookie
                            • Dec 2012
                            • 125

                            #343
                            Re: MLB 13 The Show - Overall Team Ratings, Including Batting, Pitching and Defense

                            Looks like power once again is a huge factor in player overall ratings, Mike Napoli and Jarrod Saltalamacchia, both low contact, below average fielders have ratings of 89 and 82, respectively.

                            Comment

                            • BionicBeard52
                              Rookie
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 111

                              #344
                              How are the Red Sox at 3??
                              Xbox One/360: BionicBeard52
                              PS3: ZMF_618

                              Favorite Teams:
                              NFL: Detroit Lions
                              NCAA: Michigan State Spartans
                              NHL: Detroit Red Wings
                              MLB: Detroit Tigers
                              NBA: Detroit Pistons

                              Comment

                              • johnnyg83
                                MVP
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 1060

                                #345
                                How can the White Sox be last in fielding ratings? They had the best fielding percentage and fewest errors in the American League last year. And not a single significant defensive stat in the bottom third.

                                Comment

                                Working...