Well in 2K they actually did something right. They obviously don't have the real contracts because they aren't allowed to, but the contracts are all scaled to about 1/2 of the real value. Most even have the right number of years, even for pre-arb guys which is nice. So, in 2K Soriano is still expensive. You'd know better than me about the Show.
2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Well in 2K they actually did something right. They obviously don't have the real contracts because they aren't allowed to, but the contracts are all scaled to about 1/2 of the real value. Most even have the right number of years, even for pre-arb guys which is nice. So, in 2K Soriano is still expensive. You'd know better than me about the Show.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines -
Soriano would have to be paired with a really good young player for you to be able to net De La Rosa in return. That wouldn't be realistic though since Rubby came over to the Red Sox just last year and Soriano isn't really at fit in Boston with Papi at DH (and Gomes/Nava in LF)Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.
Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Then look at their pitching prospects in the mid-C to mid-B range.
Then make a proposal and you can get advice on such a specific proposal.
Being systematic like that takes all the guesswork out and makes it more likely to nail a good trade offer on your first try.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Hairston's a mid-C if you deal him to the right team.
Soriano should NOT be a high B + C if he is. That is wayyyyyy too much to get back. Remember, his contract is so unattractive that the Cubs have been offering to pay all but $2MM of it, and eating salary is not an option in the game, though I suppose you could edit his contract down after trading him and you could tack on extra money to a random guy on your team to simulate that.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
So after thinking about it for a bit, I think I'd be willing to part with Halladay. Ignoring his real life issues, he's having a really good year in the game with a 3-3 record and a 2.64 ERA. I'm not ready to give up Lee yet, but Halladay is someone I'd part with. However, Trevor Plouffe is someone who is an interest to me. What kind of young 3rd baseman could I get for Halladay, and who would I have to give up for Plouffe (if it's realistic). I'm trying to figure out if giving up Halladay now and getting a nice prospect back is better for my team, or if giving up a few prospects for Plouffe would be a better direction to go.Comment
-
Comment
-
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Ellsbury - .261/.311/.438 15 HR, 20 SB
Brown - .250/.309/.369 5 HR
Pettibone (AAA) 102 IP, 55 K, 45 BB, 4.71 ERA, 4.229 DIPS
Should I just scrap the Ellsbury to the Phillies idea then AC? I really don't want them to ship away Biddle for a half a year of Ellsbury, while Lee and Halladay are regressing and getting older. The Phillies are 4 games out of the wildcard spot, and he seemed like a good option. I guess the Phils just don't have the farm to pull this one off.
Ellsbury's a Boras client, and due for free agency at the end of the year. He's gong to demand a lot of money. Not sure if the Sox are willing to do that with Bradley Jr. not too far off. I could understand why they'd move him, especially if they have the intentions of letting him walk.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Ellsbury - .261/.311/.438 15 HR, 20 SB
Brown - .250/.309/.369 5 HR
Pettibone (AAA) 102 IP, 55 K, 45 BB, 4.71 ERA, 4.229 DIPS
Should I just scrap the Ellsbury to the Phillies idea then AC? I really don't want them to ship away Biddle for a half a year of Ellsbury, while Lee and Halladay are regressing and getting older. The Phillies are 4 games out of the wildcard spot, and he seemed like a good option. I guess the Phils just don't have the farm to pull this one off.
Ellsbury's a Boras client, and due for free agency at the end of the year. He's gong to demand a lot of money. Not sure if the Sox are willing to do that with Bradley Jr. not too far off. I could understand why they'd move him, especially if they have the intentions of letting him walk.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Yeah, I don't think the Phillies have enough to make a move for EllsburyComment
-
Comment
-
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
Comment