2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WaitTilNextYear
    Go Cubs Go
    • Mar 2013
    • 16830

    #4981
    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by ACMilan99
    I'm pretty sure his contract is minimal in the game.
    Well in 2K they actually did something right. They obviously don't have the real contracts because they aren't allowed to, but the contracts are all scaled to about 1/2 of the real value. Most even have the right number of years, even for pre-arb guys which is nice. So, in 2K Soriano is still expensive. You'd know better than me about the Show.
    Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

    Comment

    • Totte
      MVP
      • Mar 2005
      • 2919

      #4982
      Originally posted by KingJat1702
      Any opinions on my Soriano trade 2 pages back? Whoever gave me some help (I think it was AC or WaitTillNextYear) I did ask one question afterwards and didn't get feedback. Sorry it was Totte.
      Soriano would have to be paired with a really good young player for you to be able to net De La Rosa in return. That wouldn't be realistic though since Rubby came over to the Red Sox just last year and Soriano isn't really at fit in Boston with Papi at DH (and Gomes/Nava in LF)
      Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

      Comment

      • WaitTilNextYear
        Go Cubs Go
        • Mar 2013
        • 16830

        #4983
        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by KingJat1702
        So you think if I did Soriano/Harriston/?(DeJusus maybe) I can't get a B/C or a B alone? Is it literally impossible to do something like that and have it be realistic if it is fair?
        I'm not sure I understand what you mean, but I'd suggest you cycle through the contending teams and see who could use an outfielder.

        Then look at their pitching prospects in the mid-C to mid-B range.

        Then make a proposal and you can get advice on such a specific proposal.

        Being systematic like that takes all the guesswork out and makes it more likely to nail a good trade offer on your first try.
        Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

        Comment

        • mgcst5
          Rookie
          • Jun 2011
          • 381

          #4984
          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
          Hairston's a mid-C if you deal him to the right team.

          Soriano should NOT be a high B + C if he is. That is wayyyyyy too much to get back. Remember, his contract is so unattractive that the Cubs have been offering to pay all but $2MM of it, and eating salary is not an option in the game, though I suppose you could edit his contract down after trading him and you could tack on extra money to a random guy on your team to simulate that.
          How do you edit contracts?

          Comment

          • k_mac
            MVP
            • Mar 2011
            • 2059

            #4985
            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Even if the Sox are still in it, what are the chances that Ellsbury gets traded?

            If that's a yes, is Dominic Brown + Jonathan Pettibone enough?

            Comment

            • bwoodring9
              Pro
              • May 2012
              • 683

              #4986
              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              So after thinking about it for a bit, I think I'd be willing to part with Halladay. Ignoring his real life issues, he's having a really good year in the game with a 3-3 record and a 2.64 ERA. I'm not ready to give up Lee yet, but Halladay is someone I'd part with. However, Trevor Plouffe is someone who is an interest to me. What kind of young 3rd baseman could I get for Halladay, and who would I have to give up for Plouffe (if it's realistic). I'm trying to figure out if giving up Halladay now and getting a nice prospect back is better for my team, or if giving up a few prospects for Plouffe would be a better direction to go.

              Comment

              • bwoodring9
                Pro
                • May 2012
                • 683

                #4987
                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by k_mac
                Even if the Sox are still in it, what are the chances that Ellsbury gets traded?

                If that's a yes, is Dominic Brown + Jonathan Pettibone enough?
                How well are these 3 guys playing?

                Comment

                • AC
                  Win the East
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 14951

                  #4988
                  Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by k_mac
                  Even if the Sox are still in it, what are the chances that Ellsbury gets traded?

                  If that's a yes, is Dominic Brown + Jonathan Pettibone enough?
                  Not nearly enough for Ellsbury.
                  "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                  Comment

                  • CKW11
                    MVP
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 1540

                    #4989
                    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by ACMilan99
                    Not nearly enough for Ellsbury.
                    And on top of this if the Sox are in it I highly doubt they move their starting CFer.

                    Comment

                    • k_mac
                      MVP
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 2059

                      #4990
                      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by bwoodring9
                      How well are these 3 guys playing?
                      Ellsbury - .261/.311/.438 15 HR, 20 SB

                      Brown - .250/.309/.369 5 HR
                      Pettibone (AAA) 102 IP, 55 K, 45 BB, 4.71 ERA, 4.229 DIPS

                      Originally posted by ACMilan99
                      Not nearly enough for Ellsbury.
                      Should I just scrap the Ellsbury to the Phillies idea then AC? I really don't want them to ship away Biddle for a half a year of Ellsbury, while Lee and Halladay are regressing and getting older. The Phillies are 4 games out of the wildcard spot, and he seemed like a good option. I guess the Phils just don't have the farm to pull this one off.

                      Originally posted by CKW11
                      And on top of this if the Sox are in it I highly doubt they move their starting CFer.
                      Ellsbury's a Boras client, and due for free agency at the end of the year. He's gong to demand a lot of money. Not sure if the Sox are willing to do that with Bradley Jr. not too far off. I could understand why they'd move him, especially if they have the intentions of letting him walk.

                      Comment

                      • AC
                        Win the East
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 14951

                        #4991
                        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        I see no reason Ellsbury wouldn't be dealt regardless of standing, but it'll be more than Brown.
                        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                        Comment

                        • CKW11
                          MVP
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 1540

                          #4992
                          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by k_mac
                          Ellsbury - .261/.311/.438 15 HR, 20 SB

                          Brown - .250/.309/.369 5 HR
                          Pettibone (AAA) 102 IP, 55 K, 45 BB, 4.71 ERA, 4.229 DIPS



                          Should I just scrap the Ellsbury to the Phillies idea then AC? I really don't want them to ship away Biddle for a half a year of Ellsbury, while Lee and Halladay are regressing and getting older. The Phillies are 4 games out of the wildcard spot, and he seemed like a good option. I guess the Phils just don't have the farm to pull this one off.



                          Ellsbury's a Boras client, and due for free agency at the end of the year. He's gong to demand a lot of money. Not sure if the Sox are willing to do that with Bradley Jr. not too far off. I could understand why they'd move him, especially if they have the intentions of letting him walk.
                          Oh I'm sure he won't be in a Red Sox uni next season, but it's still hard to imagine they move him in the middle pennant race. There might have been cases of this before but off the top of my head I can't remember any team trading their starting CF in the middle of a playoff run, even if they don't plan on resigning him.

                          Comment

                          • bwoodring9
                            Pro
                            • May 2012
                            • 683

                            #4993
                            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Yeah, I don't think the Phillies have enough to make a move for Ellsbury

                            Comment

                            • k_mac
                              MVP
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 2059

                              #4994
                              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by ACMilan99
                              I see no reason Ellsbury wouldn't be dealt regardless of standing, but it'll be more than Brown.
                              To Texas for Leonys Martin + Luke Jackson 74 OVR B POT ? Or Perez instead of Jackson?

                              Comment

                              • AC
                                Win the East
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 14951

                                #4995
                                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by k_mac
                                To Texas for Leonys Martin + Luke Jackson 74 OVR B POT ? Or Perez instead of Jackson?
                                I see nothing wrong with that although I'd probably add in Gallo just to give it that extra push.
                                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                                Comment

                                Working...