I disagree I think they are fine. I just finished two games by simming my batting and only pitching. I wont both games. The first one was a 4-1 win 10 hits for my guys and their pitcher was out after 5 with roughly 90 pitches. The second game I won 5-4 with 11 hits. Their pitcher went 7 and threw roughly 95 pitches. I was the Rays playing the O's. I don't see anything wrong with those numbers granted it was only two games. Also I watch the half innings and didn't just complete them.
simming half innings is definitely off
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: simming half innings is definitely off
I disagree I think they are fine. I just finished two games by simming my batting and only pitching. I wont both games. The first one was a 4-1 win 10 hits for my guys and their pitcher was out after 5 with roughly 90 pitches. The second game I won 5-4 with 11 hits. Their pitcher went 7 and threw roughly 95 pitches. I was the Rays playing the O's. I don't see anything wrong with those numbers granted it was only two games. Also I watch the half innings and didn't just complete them. -
Re: simming half innings is definitely off
Not that many runs to go ahead for only simming two innings, esp when my pitcher to that point had only given up 2 or 3 hits with me pitching. And its one thing if it happens once in a great while but it seems 75% of the time when I sim a few innings the CPU always goes ahead even if I am ahead by 4 or 5 runs.
When you have a pitcher whose ERA is 2.55 during the season and they are giving up two 3 or 4 run innings in a row, something is broken.
Small sample size
Sample bias
Why humans tend to focus on bad events over good events
"Welcome to baseball"
There's a comeback code and you've found proofComment
Comment