Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Re: Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters
Do you think Stankiwicz and Boss could move up to a B? Maybe a high B for Teddy, as he only fell because of sign ability reasons. He was the 68th ranked prospect for the draft! Boss also raked at top competition. If its too hard don't worry abut it, just giving my opinion. Thank you so much for making them!Comment
-
PSN-Shugarooo
Steam-ScottM.816
Twitch.tv/Shugarooo
Want to follow my Franchises? Join my discord: https://discord.gg/nHbNCWmmGsComment
-
Do you think Stankiwicz and Boss could move up to a B? Maybe a high B for Teddy, as he only fell because of sign ability reasons. He was the 68th ranked prospect for the draft! Boss also raked at top competition. If its too hard don't worry abut it, just giving my opinion. Thank you so much for making them!
How many rounds are you guys doing? Cause Alford on the Jays is exciting, as is Kellog, the Canadian. Alford was actually ranked top 50, I think.
Does anyone really care where I sent this from?"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters
Comment
-
Re: Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters
Do you think Stankiwicz and Boss could move up to a B? Maybe a high B for Teddy, as he only fell because of sign ability reasons. He was the 68th ranked prospect for the draft! Boss also raked at top competition. If its too hard don't worry abut it, just giving my opinion. Thank you so much for making them!Comment
-
Re: Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters
Little to no room for Alford, I have Stroman in Double A yet the Blue Jays Single A team is all filled up. I do have Mitch Nay in there tho, could maybe switch him out for Alford. Thing is Jays OF prospects are stacked so figured Nay would be a better choice.Comment
-
How's Nay looking? I'm thinking low B, he's got fairly good power, I think it's a 60. I was actually gonna put him at 2nd in my chise.
You're doing great work, keep it up!
Does anyone really care where I sent this from?"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters
Have you overwritten Justin Jackson or Sean Ochinko? Ochinko would be perfect, actually. Usually goes down to F. J Jax is underrated, but whatever. You could overwrite him. Jonathan Diaz? I know he's an infielder, but...
How's Nay looking? I'm thinking low B, he's got fairly good power, I think it's a 60. I was actually gonna put him at 2nd in my chise.
You're doing great work, keep it up!
Does anyone really care where I sent this from?
Nay is a low B with power ratings in the high 50's with an above average arm.Comment
-
Re: Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters
You gotta keep a certain amount of players at Triple A and Double A in order to not "break the game", since those 3 are in the high minors I'm leaving them in. It sucks there is a limited space but nothing I can do. If something happens I'll try to get Alford in but until then it's a wait and see game.
Nay is a low B with power ratings in the high 50's with an above average arm.
I think you could write over Chris Hawkins, or John Tolisano. Actually, if there have been any promotions, I think we could do without Ricardo Nanita! If you put Chris Schwinden in AAA, that should keep in normal. Danny Perales is also an option."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters
Awesome, Nay sounds perfect!
I think you could write over Chris Hawkins, or John Tolisano. Actually, if there have been any promotions, I think we could do without Ricardo Nanita! If you put Chris Schwinden in AAA, that should keep in normal. Danny Perales is also an option.Comment
-
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
Comment