Re: A very ambitious project...might need some pointers.
They do....so if you want....what I do is sort by potential on the default roster....and use the highest rated A/B/C/ for the player you want first....then fill in as necessary.
So with the Mets let's say...I sort the whole roster by potential....rename the top A pitcher as Tom Seaver(I just use initials to start)....then the next one Koosman.....as you see fit down in descending order....
If you want to get really crazy and export a couple of different A/B/C levels....you could always do that with the method described.
M.K.
Knight165
Perfect, that's pretty much what I was planning to do (fill the 25-man roster first, then AAA, and so on).
Now, just to make sure, you're saying any A/B/C/D potential player will do, as long as I have "base" for one of each ? Cause I was under the impression that players could/would have different ceilling from one to another, even if their potential letter is the same (or what's being refered to as A+, A, A-).
Aside from that, I think I'm good to go, and back working on my list. Thanks again Knight, really appreciated !
Now, just to make sure, you're saying any A/B/C/D potential player will do, as long as I have "base" for one of each ? Cause I was under the impression that players could/would have different ceilling from one to another, even if their potential letter is the same (or what's being refered to as A+, A, A-).
Aside from that, I think I'm good to go, and back working on my list. Thanks again Knight, really appreciated !
They do....so if you want....what I do is sort by potential on the default roster....and use the highest rated A/B/C/ for the player you want first....then fill in as necessary.
So with the Mets let's say...I sort the whole roster by potential....rename the top A pitcher as Tom Seaver(I just use initials to start)....then the next one Koosman.....as you see fit down in descending order....
If you want to get really crazy and export a couple of different A/B/C levels....you could always do that with the method described.
M.K.
Knight165
Comment