Steve Pearce

[Millennium]

I'm curious how you guys would re-ate him for the time being. I'm obviously biased, so I don't want to do it in my own and over rate what he is doing this season.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3

[Mizzou24]

Re: Steve Pearce

In my ratings I got him at

74 con r
82 con l

79 pow r
70 pow l

54 vision
66 discipline

44 speed

59arm str
53 arm acc

46 reac
47 fielding
74 stealing
16 br agg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Millennium]

Re: Steve Pearce

Wow... What is his potential at? Are you worried at all about him advancing a little too much with that?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3

[Mizzou24]

Re: Steve Pearce

I just went off my calc which I'm now noticing as I am making my minor league calc is Definitely overpowered. Especially in the power range. I have to go back through everyone and adjust probably. Not a big deal lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Millennium]

Re: Steve Pearce

I'd definitely be curious what the end result is

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3

[Mizzou24]

Re: Steve Pearce

In my ratings I got him at

74 con r
82 con l

79 pow r
70 pow l

54 vision
66 discipline

44 speed

59arm str
53 arm acc

46 reac
47 fielding
74 stealing
16 br agg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Steamers updated has him pretty stout

79 con r
87 con l

75 pow r
66 pow l

67 vis
47 disc

Same speed

87 br ability
20 br agg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[WaitTilNextYear]

Re: Steve Pearce

Don't know what your rosters look like, but those hitting attributes would place Steve Pearce as a Top 5-10 hitter in many roster sets.

[Mizzou24]

Re: Steve Pearce

Don't know what your rosters look like, but those hitting attributes would place Steve Pearce as a Top 5-10 hitter in many roster sets.

Well considering steamers has him batting well over .300 for the season yeah.. My roster isn't most rosters.. Most rosters arent accumulating correct stats.. Regardless it's a baseline until i test them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mizzou24]

Re: Steve Pearce

As for Pearce improving to fast he's already 31.. And obviously looking at his past he has improved vastly in just one year. The guy deserves props he is killing it..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mizzou24]

Re: Steve Pearce

If u average his years out his numbers would change drastically however.. But the dudes projected to be one of the top hitters in the league average wise..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Millennium]

Re: Steve Pearce

My only issue is he's only been doing it for one month. Even the first two months of this year he wasn't great (and was actually DFAed).

I feel a bit dirty going that high with the ratings. Wish SCEA would release a ratings update soon, as well.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3

[WaitTilNextYear]

Re: Steve Pearce

My only issue is he's only been doing it for one month. Even the first two months of this year he wasn't great (and was actually DFAed).

I feel a bit dirty going that high with the ratings. Wish SCEA would release a ratings update soon, as well.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3

One thing you could do is to average the ratings out between the guy who posted his numbers on Steve Pearce and some of the more prominent roster sets available (OSFM v2.0, Hybrid) and that would water down any over-emphasis on a small sample while still maintaining some of Pearce's improvement. Just a thought.

[Mizzou24]

Re: Steve Pearce

Or I can give u his averages from 2012 and 13 with steamers projections.

58 con r
74 con l

54 pow r
45 pow l





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mizzou24]

Re: Steve Pearce

It's not a small sample btw that's based off a full season just projected. Rest of the season is projections from steamers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[WaitTilNextYear]

Re: Steve Pearce

It's not a small sample btw that's based off a full season just projected. Rest of the season is projections from steamers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But it is a small sample if you're giving Steven Pearce the hitting attributes of Vladimir Guerrero. Before this year, Pearce had never had more than 188 PAs in a year, never more than 4 HRs in a year, is a career .256 hitter (including his .338 this year) so you can probably understand why people would meet high 70s/80s contact and high 60s/70s power attributes with a quizzical look. It's the same reason Millennium is hesitant to boost Pearce up that much--it actually is a very small sample so far (174 PA) regardless of what Steamer, ZiPS or anyone is saying.