2015 Chicago Cubs

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • trackstar121388
    Rookie
    • Apr 2014
    • 238

    #106
    Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

    I know there is a lot of talk about trading Wellington Castillo. (Although lately the talk has been about possibly having 3 catchers on the main roster. Not the greatest idea) But for my franchise mode I plan on keeping Castillo and getting rid of Ross. I've always liked Castillo and have always had good stats out of him too.

    Comment

    • trackstar121388
      Rookie
      • Apr 2014
      • 238

      #107
      Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

      Originally posted by Figment
      I am curious on how everyone is setting their lineup right now, or how they would set it up. I started a new franchise since we got Fowler and I am running this:

      vs RHP
      CF Dexter Fowler
      RF Ryan Sweeney
      SS Starlin Castro
      1B Anthony Rizzo
      C Miguel Montero
      2B Javier Baez
      3B Mike Olt
      RF Jorge Soler
      Pitcher

      vs LHP
      CF Dexter Fowler
      LF Chris Denorfia
      SS Starlin Castro
      1B Anthony Rizzo
      RF Jorge Soler
      2B Javier Baez
      3B Mike Olt
      C David Ross
      Pitcher

      My bench is:
      CF Arismendy Alcantara (2B/3B/SS)
      LF Chris Coghlan
      2B Tommy La Stella (3B)

      I have not yet called up Kris Bryant. I'm thinking he should be my number 3 or 4 with Rizzo, but not sure yet. Thinking something like:

      vs RHP
      CF Dexter Fowler
      SS Starlin Castro
      1B Anthony Rizzo
      3B Kris Bryant
      C Miguel Montero
      2B Javier Baez
      RF Jorge Soler
      LF Ryan Sweeney/Chris Coghlan
      Pitcher

      vs LHP
      CF Dexter Fowler
      SS Starlin Castro
      1B Anthony Rizzo
      3B Kris Bryant
      RF Jorge Soler
      LF Chris Denorfia
      2B Javier Baez
      C David Ross/Miguel Montero
      Pitcher
      Any thoughts on my lineup when I call up Kris Bryant? How does your lineup/roster look different for your franchise? When it comes to sports, I am quite the football expert, but when it comes to baseball, I am really more of just a fan. I would appreciate some outside input.

      Thanks.
      I don't plan on Sweeney starting I'll probably use Coghlan. I also plan on keeping Castillo over Ross. So my lineup would be.
      RHP
      CF Fowler
      SS Castro
      1B Rizzo
      RF Soler
      C Montero
      2B Baez
      LF Coghlan
      3B Olt
      Pitcher

      Olt and Baez's lineup positions may be flipped.

      LHP
      CF Fowler
      SS Castro
      1B Rizzo
      RF Soler
      C Castillo
      2B Baez
      LF Denorfia
      3B Olt/Alcantara
      Pitcher

      When I call up Bryant which I believe is something like 8 games in but 12 days into the season then depending on how Olt is playing.

      RHP
      CF Fowler (S)
      SS Castro (R)
      1B Rizzo (L)
      RF Soler (R)
      C Montero (L)
      2B Baez (R)
      LF Coghlan (L)
      3B Olt (R)
      Pitcher

      Olt and Baez's lineup positions may be flipped.

      LHP
      CF Fowler (S)
      SS Castro (R)
      1B Rizzo (L)
      RF Soler (R)
      C Castillo (R)
      2B Baez (R)
      LF Denorfia (R)
      3B Olt (R)/Alcantara (S)
      Pitcher

      When I bring Bryant about 8 games in 12 days into the season. Where I place him will depend on how Olt is playing. If Olt is playing well I'm going to put Bryant in the outfield. If he's not I'll put him at 3rd.

      RHP
      CF Fowler (S)
      SS Castro (R)
      1B Rizzo (L)
      RF Soler (R)
      LF/3B Bryant (R)
      C Montero (L)
      2B Baez (R)
      LF Coghlan (L)/ 3B Olt (R)
      Pitcher

      Olt and Baez's lineup positions may be flipped.

      LHP
      CF Fowler (S)
      SS Castro (R)
      1B Rizzo (L)
      RF Soler (R)
      LF/3B Bryant (R)
      C Castillo (R)
      2B Baez (R)
      LF Denorfia (R)/3B Olt (R)/Alcantara (S)
      Pitcher

      I am hoping that with Alcantara's versatility I get him a lot of playing time
      Last edited by trackstar121388; 03-19-2015, 02:31 PM.

      Comment

      • OhioCub
        Rookie
        • Apr 2014
        • 409

        #108
        Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

        Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
        As I mentioned above, there's a certain way to read statistical data, which is why I gave error bars. The fact that he hit .237 in my 4 sims (one of which he got hurt in and struggled) doesn't mean he'd hit .237 in 4 more sims. He has a reasonable probability to hit anywhere from .189 to .285 or even a bit wider than that if you think about the variation in the data. ZiPS says he'll hit .256 for reference. To pin it down further, you'd need to collect more data.

        Same with HRs. 21 +/- 7 homers means anywhere between 7 and 35 homers has a likely probability of happening in any given sim.

        Ditto on the other things.

        As always, people are free to make their own edits for favorite players they want to beef up.
        I understand that and I don't think it's unreasonably low, just on the lower end of the spectrum that I'd expect. Any chance you could post those numbers with the injury season thrown out? I'm curious what they look like under normal circumstances.

        Comment

        • OhioCub
          Rookie
          • Apr 2014
          • 409

          #109
          Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

          Originally posted by teeds
          Nope. New charts and new formulas to account for BB% and K%. I think zips has Bryant at a 33% K rate. WTNY ran sims and adjusted Knights charts to his findings.
          So if bryants vision is 18 what do you have baez at? 9?

          Comment

          • Ivanhoe
            Pro
            • Nov 2003
            • 618

            #110
            Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

            Originally posted by OhioCub
            So if bryants vision is 18 what do you have baez at? 9?
            Maybe -9...

            Comment

            • MrOldboy
              MVP
              • Feb 2011
              • 2653

              #111
              Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

              Originally posted by trackstar121388
              I know there is a lot of talk about trading Wellington Castillo. (Although lately the talk has been about possibly having 3 catchers on the main roster. Not the greatest idea) But for my franchise mode I plan on keeping Castillo and getting rid of Ross. I've always liked Castillo and have always had good stats out of him too.
              They need Castillo's value to be quite a bit higher before moving him. If signing Ross helped land Lester than maybe it was a necessary signing, but Ross' defense/game calling isn't worth losing the upside of Castillo. People forget that Castillo although lacking in framing ability is a great blocker and controls the running game well.

              Either way they need teams to value Castillo more than they do now. Everyone is just waiting on the Cubs to blink first, but the FO has shown before that they will hold out for the best deal. I would have tried Castillo at first a bit in ST even to just give the appearance of keeping him on the roster. Many in baseball just don't believe them when they say they'll keep 3 catchers on the roster. In the end though that is looking like the best option long term. Basically just hold Castillo out from other teams until they get desperate for a catcher.

              Comment

              • teeds
                Pro
                • Jun 2003
                • 551

                #112
                Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                Originally posted by OhioCub
                So if bryants vision is 18 what do you have baez at? 9?
                Baez is an 18 VIS/50 DISC

                Comment

                • Figment
                  Pro
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 772

                  #113
                  Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                  Originally posted by teeds
                  Baez is an 18 VIS/50 DISC

                  I'm not usually one to argue ratings, but there is no way Baez and Bryant have the same vision rating. That one may need some adjustment in my opinion

                  Comment

                  • CWSpalehoseCWS
                    MVP
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 1028

                    #114
                    Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                    Originally posted by Figment
                    I'm not usually one to argue ratings, but there is no way Baez and Bryant have the same vision rating. That one may need some adjustment in my opinion
                    I'd put Bryant at a 33 vision IMO. Maybe lower it a little for player progression.

                    Comment

                    • WaitTilNextYear
                      Go Cubs Go
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 16830

                      #115
                      Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                      Originally posted by OhioCub
                      I understand that and I don't think it's unreasonably low, just on the lower end of the spectrum that I'd expect. Any chance you could post those numbers with the injury season thrown out? I'm curious what they look like under normal circumstances.
                      Originally posted by OhioCub
                      So if bryants vision is 18 what do you have baez at? 9?
                      Originally posted by teeds
                      Baez is an 18 VIS/50 DISC
                      Originally posted by Figment
                      I'm not usually one to argue ratings, but there is no way Baez and Bryant have the same vision rating. That one may need some adjustment in my opinion
                      Originally posted by CWSpalehoseCWS
                      I'd put Bryant at a 33 vision IMO. Maybe lower it a little for player progression.
                      1. We hybrid folks base all ratings on data, namely ZiPS projections. If you look at ZiPS for Baez, he's projected to strike out 32.6% of the time this season. Bryant is actually projected to strike out at a slightly higher clip, 32.9%. That's why their VIS ratings are so close. Now for the "stock OSFM" roster, there can certainly be some discretion as to what ratings the OSFM teams want for their own guys, but for the Hybrid roster we will be sticking to the numbers/projections and not letting bias/opinion change it unless something's obviously in error. It would be nice if we agreed on every player, but that's just not going to happen.

                      I don't feel that uncomfortable with Baez and Bryant having the same VIS rating and people would be wise to note that no single rating determines how a player will do (the contact, disc, etc.. are different).

                      For what it's worth, Bryant struck out at a 28.6% clip in AAA and Baez had a 30.0% K rate in AAA. So, the guys saying it's night and day are obviously over counting Baez's ~200 PAs in the majors last year. A recency bias. Let's not forget that Bryant is 6'5" and tall guys can get beat inside. I am wondering what Bryant will do when MLB pitchers find the holes in his swing. Bryant will certainly deposit some of those pitches onto Waveland when pitchers miss, but he'll be striking out a lot as well. I also doubt that Baez will K in 41% of his PAs again this year (or if he does, he won't last long).

                      2. I can run some more sims and get you some more data...since you asked so nicely
                      Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                      Comment

                      • MrOldboy
                        MVP
                        • Feb 2011
                        • 2653

                        #116
                        Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                        I have Bryant's vision down low as well, so 18 seems perfectly reasonable to me. He projects to strike out a lot. It should improve over time and hopefully it does quickly so his vision rating can get bumped up a bit. But for now he projects as a very high SO major league hitter.

                        I think people get a bit too hung up on Bryant being a super-prospect and forget that he is still a baseball player.

                        Comment

                        • OhioCub
                          Rookie
                          • Apr 2014
                          • 409

                          #117
                          Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                          You know us cub fans aren't used to having a prospect of this caliber, or prospects in general for that matter lol

                          Comment

                          • WaitTilNextYear
                            Go Cubs Go
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 16830

                            #118
                            Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                            Originally posted by OhioCub
                            You know us cub fans aren't used to having a prospect of this caliber, or prospects in general for that matter lol
                            What ever do you mean?

                            Gary Scott
                            Brooks Kieschnick
                            Kevin Orie
                            Mike Harkey
                            Angel Guzman
                            Robin Jennings
                            Brant Brown
                            Hee Seop Choi
                            Julio Zuleta
                            Bobby Brownlie
                            Mark Pawelek

                            Just look at those names. Our farm system has been loaded
                            Spoiler
                            for a long time!
                            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                            Comment

                            • WaitTilNextYear
                              Go Cubs Go
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 16830

                              #119
                              Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                              Originally posted by OhioCub
                              I understand that and I don't think it's unreasonably low, just on the lower end of the spectrum that I'd expect. Any chance you could post those numbers with the injury season thrown out? I'm curious what they look like under normal circumstances.
                              Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                              I can run some more sims and get you some more data...since you asked so nicely
                              6 piping hot fresh sims right out of the game for Kris Bryant...

                              596 +/- 16 PAs
                              .257/.325/.471 +/- .022/.017/.036
                              30 HR +/- 4
                              4.94 HR% +/- 0.59
                              91 RBI +/- 4
                              30.40 K% +/- 2.12
                              8.30 BB% +/- 0.53


                              Here are Bryant's ZiPS Projections

                              557 PA
                              .256/.339/.500
                              29 HR
                              5.21 HR%
                              96 RBI
                              32.9 K%
                              9.3 BB%


                              Pretty spot on if you ask me. These are with the exact same ratings as before.

                              For giggles, let's do Baez, too (average of 6 sims).

                              549 +/- 8 PAs
                              .225/.289/.421 +/- .018/.010/.045
                              22 HR +/- 6
                              3.97 HR% +/- 1.10
                              68 RBI +/- 15
                              29.93 K% +/- 1.64
                              7.68 BB% +/- 1.06


                              Here are Baez's ZiPS Projections

                              650 PA
                              .233/.283/.447
                              30 HR
                              4.62 HR%
                              90 RBI
                              32.6 K%
                              5.8 BB%
                              Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                              Comment

                              • OhioCub
                                Rookie
                                • Apr 2014
                                • 409

                                #120
                                Re: 2015 Chicago Cubs

                                Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                                6 piping hot fresh sims right out of the game for Kris Bryant...

                                596 +/- 16 PAs
                                .257/.325/.471 +/- .022/.017/.036
                                30 HR +/- 4
                                4.94 HR% +/- 0.59
                                91 RBI +/- 4
                                30.40 K% +/- 2.12
                                8.30 BB% +/- 0.53


                                Here are Bryant's ZiPS Projections

                                557 PA
                                .256/.339/.500
                                29 HR
                                5.21 HR%
                                96 RBI
                                32.9 K%
                                9.3 BB%


                                Pretty spot on if you ask me. These are with the exact same ratings as before.

                                For giggles, let's do Baez, too (average of 6 sims).

                                549 +/- 8 PAs
                                .225/.289/.421 +/- .018/.010/.045
                                22 HR +/- 6
                                3.97 HR% +/- 1.10
                                68 RBI +/- 15
                                29.93 K% +/- 1.64
                                7.68 BB% +/- 1.06


                                Here are Baez's ZiPS Projections

                                650 PA
                                .233/.283/.447
                                30 HR
                                4.62 HR%
                                90 RBI
                                32.6 K%
                                5.8 BB%
                                Those look more like what I'd expect and as you said, pretty spot on (assuming they play to their projections of course). Maybe in the future when doing sims throw out significantly shortened injury seasons cause that seemed to make all the difference. Just my two cents though. These are the ratings for the hybrid roster correct? If so, you just sold me. In the past I've been afraid to venture outside of the standard osfm rosters.

                                Comment

                                Working...