OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

[braves2011]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Release date is unknown at this point.... Would like it to be a quickly as possible but it just depends on my real life commitments. Working on it with a few others so my advice is go ahead make corrections yourself and jump into franchise. When V2 comes out and if you decide its worth it to start over so be it. This was probably the best overall V1 we ever released.... Yes there were mistakes but for a project of this magnitude and the fluidity of the minor leagues at the time, I think we nailed it pretty good. Lots of easy fixs and some great rosters uploaded off of OSFM with fixes already (ahhemmm Millennium)[emoji12]Ill keep you guys posted. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Awesome Man! Thanks for taking a moment to respond. You answered my concerns 100%. I hope you take some time, it would be well deserved!

Enjoy the 2015 season!

[Bucksfan7]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

that was me. I went through this thread, the #'s thread, and the stance edit thread and edited and imported the missing items. I will be doing so every few days or when there is a big omission that was missed. Credit to the OSFM guys for another year of fantastic rosters. I like to just edit these and export them to try and help the calm the storm for the hybrid and v2 rosters.

Awesome I appreciate it very much! Good work my man.

[russilini]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

well...i was so happy to see rosters...but then i went through them...pitcher selection of pitches is totally bogus ...did anyone check scouting reports...you got pitchers throwing sinkers and sliders...when they only throw fast balls and change ups....you can also go to youtube to find out a players wind-up or batting stance,,,,these rosters are only good as a canvas...IF...because their are 1000's of changes needed...also the selection of players is lacking...why not have each teams top 20 prospects...instead i see 30 year old nobodies in A ball taking space,,,,,i know how hard it is to make rosters...and im sure plenty of people put in effort, but clearly most just tag players with names and height...very disappointing

[Bucksfan7]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

well...i was so happy to see rosters...but then i went through them...pitcher selection of pitches is totally bogus ...did anyone check scouting reports...you got pitchers throwing sinkers and sliders...when they only throw fast balls and change ups....you can also go to youtube to find out a players wind-up or batting stance,,,,these rosters are only good as a canvas...IF...because their are 1000's of changes needed...also the selection of players is lacking...why not have each teams top 20 prospects...instead i see 30 year old nobodies in A ball taking space,,,,,i know how hard it is to make rosters...and im sure plenty of people put in effort, but clearly most just tag players with names and height...very disappointing

You do realize these guys don't have to do this for anyone. And it's only version 1. Version 2 they said will have the fixes. Think of version 1 as a rough draft, there will always be mistakes first go around. And it can't be easy when people are always asking for an eta. instead of knocking the work appreciate because these guys could easily stop doing this and we'd all be s.o.l.

[sink4ever]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

well...i was so happy to see rosters...but then i went through them...pitcher selection of pitches is totally bogus ...did anyone check scouting reports...you got pitchers throwing sinkers and sliders...when they only throw fast balls and change ups....you can also go to youtube to find out a players wind-up or batting stance,,,,these rosters are only good as a canvas...IF...because their are 1000's of changes needed...also the selection of players is lacking...why not have each teams top 20 prospects...instead i see 30 year old nobodies in A ball taking space,,,,,i know how hard it is to make rosters...and im sure plenty of people put in effort, but clearly most just tag players with names and height...very disappointing

You may want to double check that you actually downloaded the correct roster. I personally know that the Yankees were deeply researched and I am sure every other team was done at least as thoroughly.

[beantownbruins]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

well...i was so happy to see rosters...but then i went through them...pitcher selection of pitches is totally bogus ...did anyone check scouting reports...you got pitchers throwing sinkers and sliders...when they only throw fast balls and change ups....you can also go to youtube to find out a players wind-up or batting stance,,,,these rosters are only good as a canvas...IF...because their are 1000's of changes needed...also the selection of players is lacking...why not have each teams top 20 prospects...instead i see 30 year old nobodies in A ball taking space,,,,,i know how hard it is to make rosters...and im sure plenty of people put in effort, but clearly most just tag players with names and height...very disappointing

..........wow..........

[Mcl]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

well...i was so happy to see rosters...but then i went through them...pitcher selection of pitches is totally bogus ...did anyone check scouting reports...you got pitchers throwing sinkers and sliders...when they only throw fast balls and change ups....you can also go to youtube to find out a players wind-up or batting stance,,,,these rosters are only good as a canvas...IF...because their are 1000's of changes needed...also the selection of players is lacking...why not have each teams top 20 prospects...instead i see 30 year old nobodies in A ball taking space,,,,,i know how hard it is to make rosters...and im sure plenty of people put in effort, but clearly most just tag players with names and height...very disappointing

NOTHING LIKE 1st WORLD PROBLEMS!!!!! WOULD YOU COMPLAIN IF I GAVE YOU YOUR SECOND FAVORITE ICE CREAM FOR FREE CAUSE ITS NOT YOUR #1 FAVORITE?

[dero101]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

The rosters are awesome just like they have been for the past few years. If possible could Taylor Gushue be added.

Thanks again for donating all of your guys time to make this game better for us.

[tree3five]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

The rosters are awesome just like they have been for the past few years. If possible could Taylor Gushue be added.

Thanks again for donating all of your guys time to make this game better for us.

We created him, he didnt make the cut, however GoBucs09 put a lot of the extra players in the player vault including Gushue. His PSN is Se7eNpatch.

Here are the rest that he uploaded:

SP - Bleich
C - Jhang
RF - Barnes
SP - Castro
SS - Frazier
2B - Brown
RP - Balester
LF - Howard
SS - Jones
C - Gushue
CF - Roy
RF - Joe
SP - Tarpley
SP - Dickson
SP - Brault
SP - Supak
RP - Ludwig
RP - Inman
RP - Singh
RP - Hafner

[RidinDwnKingsley]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

well...i was so happy to see rosters...but then i went through them...pitcher selection of pitches is totally bogus ...did anyone check scouting reports...you got pitchers throwing sinkers and sliders...when they only throw fast balls and change ups....you can also go to youtube to find out a players wind-up or batting stance,,,,these rosters are only good as a canvas...IF...because their are 1000's of changes needed...also the selection of players is lacking...why not have each teams top 20 prospects...instead i see 30 year old nobodies in A ball taking space,,,,,i know how hard it is to make rosters...and im sure plenty of people put in effort, but clearly most just tag players with names and height...very disappointing

Heres an idea......

Make your own set next year, let me know how it comes out


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BroadStreetDog]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Heres an idea......

Make your own set next year, let me know how it comes out


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hey man, at least he gave constructive feedback. His negativity wasn't just baseless or lacking context.

While I understand nobody wants negative feedback after putting so much effort into something, if it ultimately makes the product better, why disregard it?

[RidinDwnKingsley]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Hey man, at least he gave constructive feedback. His negativity wasn't just baseless or lacking context.



While I understand nobody wants negative feedback after putting so much effort into something, if it ultimately makes the product better, why disregard it?

If you really read his post and you think its constructive feedback then I feel sorry for you as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ItAllFades]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Not sure if it's been mentioned, but quite a few Astros have an extra space after their first name that messes up the spacing of their names on the menu.

[BroadStreetDog]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

If you really read his post and you think its constructive feedback then I feel sorry for you as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Little full of ourselves, aren't we? How's the view from that high horse? Either way, I appreciate your sympathy.

Sure, his critique was sharply worded - and he definitely came across as a jerk, I don't think that's up for debate - but he gave concrete examples of what he disliked and, if true, appears a legitimate issue to question.

[RidinDwnKingsley]

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Little full of ourselves, aren't we? How's the view from that high horse? Either way, I appreciate your sympathy.



Sure, his critique was sharply worded - and he definitely came across as a jerk, I don't think that's up for debate - but he gave concrete examples of what he disliked and, if true, appears a legitimate issue to question.

Wow, this place gets better and better.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk