OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

**Ripner** · 04-25-2015, 05:34 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by ChevyDawg82

Right but the league I'm in the commissioner is the one able to do that. I was wondering if his speed could be edited in the next release of that roster?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm sure it will be looked at since you mentioned it here.

**Amcc004** · 04-25-2015, 10:26 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

I'm glad the guys working the corrections are taking the time to get it right. It was disappointing seeing players outright copied from the 150 top prospects roster in the OSFM roster. I'm really just hoping version 2 tones down the top 10 prospects since they are all have super high OVR after 1 and 2 seasons of a franchise. Having a 90+ OVR Moncada at age 21 is just ********.

**RidinDwnKingsley** · 04-25-2015, 11:42 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by beantownbruins

So Ridin I'm a little bit confused and hoping you can help me understand a bit more about Version 2. In years past there have always been multiple Versions of OSFM and I have always waited for Version 2 to start my franchise. What I'm confused about is are you saying it will be a couple of weeks before Version 2 is released or a couple of weeks until a Version 3, 4, etc. is released? I know a couple of days ago you said that you will be posting an update soon and I'm just hoping that you see this post and can help answer my confusion. Thanks as always to you and all the roster makers who work so hard on these... Always worth the wait.

Nothing to be confused about. As i have stated multiple times I am working on V2. I dont have an ETA yet, if/when I do I will update you. It will be worth the wait.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**QuestGAV** · 04-26-2015, 12:05 AM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by Amcc004

Having a 90+ OVR Moncada at age 21 is just ********.

Yeah, it's totally unrealistic for guys to be great baseball players at 21-22 years old. Never happens. Can't imagine what it would even look like.

**sxaalex** · 04-26-2015, 12:08 AM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by Amcc004

I'm glad the guys working the corrections are taking the time to get it right. It was disappointing seeing players outright copied from the 150 top prospects roster in the OSFM roster. I'm really just hoping version 2 tones down the top 10 prospects since they are all have super high OVR after 1 and 2 seasons of a franchise. Having a 90+ OVR Moncada at age 21 is just ********.

This was what i was implying to ridin that many roster edtior did follow the spreadsheet but also adjust the rating to their liking.Now you have prospect like yoan moncada, carlos correa insingle A and AA with rating near the 80's.Doesn't anyone taken account how quickly prospect rating,potential can rise within a year .What happen following this guide

95-99 - Superstar player, Future HOF player
90-94 - Perennial All Star, Bottom End Superstar - a true Ace or top 2/3 player, some Closers but not all
85-89 - semi Regular All Stars, Could be a #1 starter on most teams, most Closers and high end Set up guys
80-84 - sometimes All Star/Everyday player on any team, 2/3 Starters, low end Closers and most set ups guys
75-79 - Everyday player on most teams/high end Bench players, most 3/4 starters, low end set up or very good relievers
70-74 - Bench Players/on the cusp minor league players or AAAA players, 4/5 starters, average relievers
65-69 - AAAA players or career AAA players
60-64 - AAA or good AA players
55-59 - AA or high A
50-54 - High A quality which includes good Short Season A players
45-49 - high school draftees

**Millennium** · 04-26-2015, 09:08 AM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by Picards__flute

Newest roster set is out! Under Picard's__Flute.... titled Locutus OSFM Hyb

Hamilton is moved, and rosters are updated. Check the thread for details on why this roster set is so ideal for non 30 team control franchise mode.

http://www.operationsports.com/forum...an-hybrid.html

Included are simmed seasons, stats, and every update from Picard 1 through Picards 7th (titled Locutus).

ENJOY!

Please keep talk of your roster in your threads. This thread is for the official OSFM roster.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3

**Amcc004** · 04-26-2015, 09:58 AM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by QuestGAV

Yeah, it's totally unrealistic for guys to be great baseball players at 21-22 years old. Never happens. Can't imagine what it would even look like.

Thanks for using an emoticon to make it less hostile.

I get what you are saying but so many people overhype prospects. You seem like one of these people basically saying Moncada is the next Arod. IMO none or atleast most of those players would not be listed at 90+ overall at age 21. As stated in another post, the potentials are too high if the OVR isn't. Their ratings increase way too fast with even mediocre performance. Also keep in mind the drafted players in franchise mode can also be high overalls but at least the game compensates with age somewhat. I understand that the game doesn't compensate for draft busts or whatever but I was just trying to say that overalls and potentials should be managed more conservatively. Thanks for replying to my post.

**Picards__flute** · 04-26-2015, 01:19 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by Millennium

Please keep talk of your roster in your threads. This thread is for the official OSFM roster.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3

No prob. 100% agree.

Thanks again for the 40 man sets. If it wasn't for you my rosters wouldn't be here today Mill. They'd probably be dead... face down in a drained pool somewhere.

**QuestGAV** · 04-26-2015, 03:46 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by Amcc004

Also keep in mind the drafted players in franchise mode can also be high overalls but at least the game compensates with age somewhat.

So the drafted players coming in with high OVR/POT means that existing prospects have to at least match that or they're completely useless fodder. I'd rather have guys like Moncada come in and seem a little high than have them all be obsolete fodder after the first draft class.

I understand that the game doesn't compensate for draft busts or whatever but I was just trying to say that overalls and potentials should be managed more conservatively. Thanks for replying to my post.

Yeah, there's definitely a balance to be found. Your original post seemed to be advocating for all of the prospects to be worse than what they need to be to actually pop out and play like they should. Moncada's OVR looks high, but if you look at his ratings it's mostly wrapped up in stuff that's realistic for a guy with that ceiling to be good at for his age.

**RandyBass** · 04-26-2015, 08:32 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by rovert22044

His potential rating in OSFM V1 is 88, which means he's on the edge of becoming an elite prospect. If he performs well in your franchise, you'll see that potential increase to an A value after a season or so.

Personally from what I've scouted on him, I project him as a solid every day player, NOT an elite player. I project him as a Matt Holliday type player but not as good.

Just my opinion though. The great thing about the roster is: it's TOTALLY editable! You don't like it, you can edit it yourself. But I personally think a high B potential is suiting.

Ooooh wow, your scouting credentials are impressive

but I think I'll go with the more established consensus that he was one of the best hitters, if not the best, in his draft class.

And the whole point of this thread is to bring up issues you might have, so simply saying "edit him yourself" is a bit foolish to say the least.

I don't know, if being taken 6th overall and being labelled probably the best in an entire draft class isn't worthy of an "A" potential then what is? It's not like the guy has stumbled at the minor league level, as he's only had something like 150 PAs. No reason to trim anything off his potential yet.

**QuestGAV** · 04-26-2015, 08:53 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Originally posted by RandyBass

Ooooh wow, your scouting credentials are impressive

but I think I'll go with the more established consensus that he was one of the best hitters, if not the best, in his draft class.

And the whole point of this thread is to bring up issues you might have, so simply saying "edit him yourself" is a bit foolish to say the least.

I don't know, if being taken 6th overall and being labelled probably the best in an entire draft class isn't worthy of an "A" potential then what is? It's not like the guy has stumbled at the minor league level, as he's only had something like 150 PAs. No reason to trim anything off his potential yet.

You appear to be taking a value of 88 versus 90 quite personally.

14 Crawford 89
15 Rodon 89
16 Glasnow 90
17 Swihart 91
18 Daniel Norris 88
19 K Scwarber 86
20 A Jackson 88
21 R Castillo SCEA
22 D Dahl 88
23 R Stephenson 92
24 J Gray 89
25 A Bradley 97?
26 B Shipley 87

Bradley's POT is a bit crazy, perhaps a typo? But it otherwise appears Mr. Jackson is rated appropriately when compared to similar prospects.

**sxaalex** · 04-27-2015, 10:08 AM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Andrew albers (bluejays),Atahualpa severino(Angels)and Todd cunningham(Braves) are missing service time.

**sxaalex** · 04-27-2015, 12:12 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Yankees prospect rp nick rumbelow and Rockies prospect both has service time and
the braves are missing rp John Cornely http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp...ching/2015/ALL. You can replace him with carlos perezwho has been release by the braves

**MCGREGOR__** · 04-27-2015, 09:19 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Aaron Hicks of the Twins should be a switch hitter.

**CologeroNYY** · 04-27-2015, 09:51 PM

Re: OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

When is the next roster coming out?

OSFM2015 V.1 - Corrections

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment