I'm in process of restarting my franchise but I'm unsure if I should use default vs real when using single team control
Real contracts vs default
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Real contracts vs default
My apologies if such a topic already exists, but I was wondering if anyone using single team control is using real contract salaries? Has this negatively impacted franchise?
I'm in process of restarting my franchise but I'm unsure if I should use default vs real when using single team controlTags: None -
Re: Real contracts vs default
There are really two camps on the idea of real vs default contracts. You can probably search and find most of them. I would but I am on my phone right now and just can't.
From my tests this year, if you use real contracts, all teams have a seriously bloated available money to spend. Simming 3 years out with the Nationals I had a budget of over 190 million with 97 million available to spend in year 3. I signed every player on my roster including Harper to a 9 year deal and had money left over to sign Mochado and Harvery.
Another down side is with small market teams. In year 3 of my sim the Padres, Reds, Brewers and A's all had budgets over 120 million and around 30/40 million in free money to spend.
For me this is even more un realistic than using default contracts and money. I also do not use 30 team control.
This is of course my opinion and experience only. I know I am in the minority but I have just gotten tired of waiting for rosters and updates, etc. I ran with default rosters at default setting with DD and I just finished my first year of my Nationals franchise.In Loving memory of my "Cricket" 1/2/96 - 11/19/2012
My heart and soul hurt for your lost presence in my life.Comment
Comment