So I've just recently dabbled in downloading user made rosters for MLB 17. I decided to go with the 1997 roster(Baumy300) and probably my favorite season,the 1989 roster(PJsnell) and I have to say both rosters are extremely well done,I'm absolutely blown away with the accuracy and the players ratings in these rosters. That being said,and I know a lot of work was done to try to make the non legendary players appearances and stances as accurate as possible, but you are at the mercy of the limits of the player editor and only so much can be done to make the players look true to their real life counterparts.
So my question is this; since I'm way more into the historic user made rosters than I am into current MLB rosters,would I get more enjoyment out of MLB 18? I noticed when I was in Gamestop today that it's been marked down to $39, which is really making me consider making the upgrade. Do the historic rosters end up turning out noticeably better on MLB 18, especially since they included a batting stance editor? I'd imagine it would be easier to dial in on certain players unique batting stances.
Maybe there are more face/head/facial hair options as well,making it easier to replicate more of the players from those eras that aren't included on the legends rosters. I have yet to play MLB 18,and I have heard from several people that from a gameplay perspective it's not a huge leap forward,but for those of us that love to download the retro rosters,would I get much more enjoyment out of 18 than I would 17? I'm really on the fence with this right now, one minute I'm thinking I'm definitely going to make the jump,then I realize how much fun I'm having with 17 and wondering if I'll even notice a difference.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Operation Sports mobile app
So my question is this; since I'm way more into the historic user made rosters than I am into current MLB rosters,would I get more enjoyment out of MLB 18? I noticed when I was in Gamestop today that it's been marked down to $39, which is really making me consider making the upgrade. Do the historic rosters end up turning out noticeably better on MLB 18, especially since they included a batting stance editor? I'd imagine it would be easier to dial in on certain players unique batting stances.
Maybe there are more face/head/facial hair options as well,making it easier to replicate more of the players from those eras that aren't included on the legends rosters. I have yet to play MLB 18,and I have heard from several people that from a gameplay perspective it's not a huge leap forward,but for those of us that love to download the retro rosters,would I get much more enjoyment out of 18 than I would 17? I'm really on the fence with this right now, one minute I'm thinking I'm definitely going to make the jump,then I realize how much fun I'm having with 17 and wondering if I'll even notice a difference.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Operation Sports mobile app
Comment