This time around, I'm using much lower values - $2 M for each. Spread $1-6M instead of $3-18M.
My reasoning: narrow the spread between teams in the red and the max spending possible. Also, teams that are profitable can spend closer to the max (in theory - easier to spend $5 M than $15 M for spending 1.5x the baseline...plus, hurts less with retaining talent and signing players). I'm noticing teams going heavily after the international talents on long term deals, etc, including middle and lower markets teams (i.e. I'm not the only small market team trying infuse talent via internationals).
For example, the ChiSox, a struggling team, are still able to spend double the baseline in both. I'm thinking that will help them have solid knowledge and ability to grow their prospects while freeing up money for staff (which I'm now having to fight for the talented staff, getting into bidding wars - like I had to fight off like four teams for this fictional bench coach it was like...good gracious LOL) and such.
Now, I don't know if this is just randomness/GMs that teams hired or if it's really impacting, so I'm curious to what others are using and if my reasoning makes sense.
Comment