Since we won't be getting a new ASB anytime soon, which one would you choose if you could only have one: 2004 or 2005?
I really like 2004 with great movies (BUCK!), intro video, walk up music, and stat over lays (current numbers are usually up for the whole at bat). The big negatives are no moves in spring training without waiver, no injuries during user controlled games and the way free agents just walk at the end of the year without even giving you a chance to resign them.
With 2005 I like the fielder cam and the fix to the two drawbacks listed above. I don't like how computer AI is weak (singles that should be doubles, no tagging up, etc), the expansion draft is too easy (way too many good players to make an unstoppable team), and as in all games that year, no Barry Bonds.
So I go with 2004. How about you guys?
I really like 2004 with great movies (BUCK!), intro video, walk up music, and stat over lays (current numbers are usually up for the whole at bat). The big negatives are no moves in spring training without waiver, no injuries during user controlled games and the way free agents just walk at the end of the year without even giving you a chance to resign them.
With 2005 I like the fielder cam and the fix to the two drawbacks listed above. I don't like how computer AI is weak (singles that should be doubles, no tagging up, etc), the expansion draft is too easy (way too many good players to make an unstoppable team), and as in all games that year, no Barry Bonds.
So I go with 2004. How about you guys?
Comment