Help me out here if I'm wrong, but...
If, say, 2K or EA had made The Show, or if it had already made a name for itself, would we all be acting the same way? From my viewpoint, it seems as though people try their hardest to ridicule every single aspect of Madden every year, MLB 2K6, etc... all big-name games. The Show came out of next-to-nowhere--NFL 2K5 didn't, but in relation to Madden, it could have been seen as it doing the same thing, considering how the percentage of people who played 2K as opposed to Madden 2yrs ago, for the price or other reason, gazzilion-ultiplied for NFL 2K5. I've never played The Show, but NFL 2K5 had its share of problems, but I--and many others--love(d) it and still play it to this day. It appears as though there's a similar reaction towards The Show. On the other hand, you have people on a balls-out rampage against Madden 06 (for 360) and MLB 2K6. It's almost as though--not to put words in anyones' mouths--many people here were determined to find anything wrong they could with the more popular game, as if they had convinced themselves already that they wanted to be the one to spoil the party for everyone else, whereas the Show people seem as though they're much more carefree about it and, as a result, enjoying their game much more than the 2K6 people.
Of course, MLB 2K6 could just be that bad, and The Show could just be that good. But it's worth wondering, whether this has any basis in reality or not, how exactly people judge their games, and if our opinions on 2K6 as compared to The Show are strictly about the game, or are about something on another level--the whole "obscurity factor," the game's popularity, etc.
Is there something predetermined about how people judge games--I mean, do people tend to take into account more than just the game itself? And on that note, what does the whole "popularity/obscurity factor" have to do with it?
Not really an argument here, just some food for thought and discussion.
Again, I haven't really been part of the online sports video game community, or whatever, for too long, so I'm interested in seeing what some of you guys think.
On that note, discuss.
Edit for clarification: Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say 2K6 is better than The Show, or vice-versa: I haven't played either. The Show sounds amazing. I'm sure it's a great game, and probably a lot better than 2K6. I'm just wondering what goes into peoples' considerations when judging games, is all.
Edit 2: And let me point out that I think it's fair that EA and 2K get "dumped on," for the reasons people have been mentioning, such as a lack of new innovations in Madden, etc.
Edit 3: Again, I'm not saying there's some sort of "other reason" people love The Show. I'm sure it's a great game. Again, I'm not trying to prove a point of any kind.
Final edit: OK, just to sum this up, and to keep people from having to navigate through the pages: what I'm trying to say is, possibly because the expectations are not as great, people aren't going out of their way to nitpick every single detail about it--just like NFL 2K5, at least from my experience. It seems as though they are focused on what the developers put in the game, and not what isn't in there, like the MLB 2K6 fans seem to be. I'm talking about the ex-MVPers that just converted over this year, that had never played those before. The game has been praised for 2-3 years, but it doesn't have nearly as wide an audience due to its exclusitivity. I would think that since 2K's games are more widely available, and the fact that 2K Sports is a bigger brand name, that people would be expecting more, especially with their exclusive licensing, and that seems to be the case.
If, say, 2K or EA had made The Show, or if it had already made a name for itself, would we all be acting the same way? From my viewpoint, it seems as though people try their hardest to ridicule every single aspect of Madden every year, MLB 2K6, etc... all big-name games. The Show came out of next-to-nowhere--NFL 2K5 didn't, but in relation to Madden, it could have been seen as it doing the same thing, considering how the percentage of people who played 2K as opposed to Madden 2yrs ago, for the price or other reason, gazzilion-ultiplied for NFL 2K5. I've never played The Show, but NFL 2K5 had its share of problems, but I--and many others--love(d) it and still play it to this day. It appears as though there's a similar reaction towards The Show. On the other hand, you have people on a balls-out rampage against Madden 06 (for 360) and MLB 2K6. It's almost as though--not to put words in anyones' mouths--many people here were determined to find anything wrong they could with the more popular game, as if they had convinced themselves already that they wanted to be the one to spoil the party for everyone else, whereas the Show people seem as though they're much more carefree about it and, as a result, enjoying their game much more than the 2K6 people.
Of course, MLB 2K6 could just be that bad, and The Show could just be that good. But it's worth wondering, whether this has any basis in reality or not, how exactly people judge their games, and if our opinions on 2K6 as compared to The Show are strictly about the game, or are about something on another level--the whole "obscurity factor," the game's popularity, etc.
Is there something predetermined about how people judge games--I mean, do people tend to take into account more than just the game itself? And on that note, what does the whole "popularity/obscurity factor" have to do with it?
Not really an argument here, just some food for thought and discussion.
Again, I haven't really been part of the online sports video game community, or whatever, for too long, so I'm interested in seeing what some of you guys think.
On that note, discuss.
Edit for clarification: Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say 2K6 is better than The Show, or vice-versa: I haven't played either. The Show sounds amazing. I'm sure it's a great game, and probably a lot better than 2K6. I'm just wondering what goes into peoples' considerations when judging games, is all.
Edit 2: And let me point out that I think it's fair that EA and 2K get "dumped on," for the reasons people have been mentioning, such as a lack of new innovations in Madden, etc.
Edit 3: Again, I'm not saying there's some sort of "other reason" people love The Show. I'm sure it's a great game. Again, I'm not trying to prove a point of any kind.
Final edit: OK, just to sum this up, and to keep people from having to navigate through the pages: what I'm trying to say is, possibly because the expectations are not as great, people aren't going out of their way to nitpick every single detail about it--just like NFL 2K5, at least from my experience. It seems as though they are focused on what the developers put in the game, and not what isn't in there, like the MLB 2K6 fans seem to be. I'm talking about the ex-MVPers that just converted over this year, that had never played those before. The game has been praised for 2-3 years, but it doesn't have nearly as wide an audience due to its exclusitivity. I would think that since 2K's games are more widely available, and the fact that 2K Sports is a bigger brand name, that people would be expecting more, especially with their exclusive licensing, and that seems to be the case.

Comment