Major League Baseball 2K10 Screenshots (IGN)
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: New Screens
Yeah I know, the frame rate wasn't an issue in 2K9, maybe a few times on foul balls, but nothing game breaking like 2K8. He also said Hurry up Baseball was a new feature, which was obviously in last years game. That guy didn't know what the hell he was talking about.Michigan Wolverines
NY JETS
NY Mets
NY Knicks :(
Comment
-
Re: New Screens
)
I looked back at some early 2K9 pictures, and they looked fine. That's what's funny to me about your comment. I didn't think (aside from those horrible textures on gloves, etc that I already mentioned) 2K9 looked bad at all. So to act as though saying they look roughly the same is a slight or "agenda" is a pretty unfair generalization. If anything, it would be relatively good news, considering that one hands-on said the graphics took a hit.
If you care to point out what you find particularly better, I'd love to read it. (seriously...not being snarky here) Regardless of what either of us see or don't, it's only a handful of early pictures...I don't see why lines need to be drawn.
EDIT: and here's a picture of 2K9 (actually from a game):
Looking at this I think some of the so-called upgrades that have been listed by posters are mere over-analyzing. The detail of the colors looked a bit sharper in a couple of the 2K10 pics, that much I do see.Last edited by SoxFan01605; 01-13-2010, 09:32 PM.Comment
-
Last edited by jeffy777; 01-13-2010, 09:36 PM.Comment
-
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES
FLY EAGLES FLY
Comment
-
Re: New Screens
Again, that's not trashing the game...as I thought aside from the equipment textures and faces, the graphics were solid in 2K9. My other point was, 5 pictures isn't enough to determine the graphical state of 2K10 either way. I'll leave it alone as some people tend to be far too defensive (not you Jeffy) about this stuff. That is all!Last edited by SoxFan01605; 01-13-2010, 09:52 PM.Comment
-
Re: New Screens
lol...that's fine. I just grabbed an early pic from the game. The point was missed, I think. I was actually saying the pic wasn't bad. Your picture is better, but I still don't see an obvious upgrade with these 2K10 pics. That was the only point of posting that pic. All these comments about grass textures, etc being fuller, more detailed, etc...I don't see it.
Again, that's not trashing the game...as I thought aside from the equipment textures and faces, the graphics were solid in 2K9. My other point was, 5 pictures isn't enough to determine the graphical state of 2K10 either way. I'll leave it alone as some people tend to be far too defensive (not you Jeffy) about this stuff. That is all!Comment
-
Re: New Screens
For early screens, 2k10 shots seem tighter graphically. I'm liking the way the player models look also
2k9
2k10
2k9
2k10
2k9
2k10
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: New Screens
Looks horrible also looks like I wont even give 2K a chance this year. If it stays looking like this, I wont even spend the $7 to rent it.Check out my first blog...
"Give up 2k Baseball" and no it is just not a complaint fan boy blog :P it is about Phillips affiar!
Mini Blog #1 up
"What up with Hamels?" MW2 commercialComment
-
Re: New Screens
Yep, gameplay is all I really care about at this point. Graphics look alright, now I want to know more about how it plays, from someone other than this IGN guy who seems a bit clueless.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: New Screens
I can't tell much difference in those comparison picks. The only thing different is there seems to be less blur this year resulting in some sharper images.“The saddest part of life is when someone who gave you your best memories becomes a memory”Comment
Comment