As spank says above, the PS3 has a history of looking worse than its 360 counterpart in sports games. I don't pretend to know anything about hardware to tell you why, but I'm sure more knowledgeable minds can intersect.
2K has competition on the PS3 and is not trying to ignore that market just because the 360 market has no competition in baseball.
Also, I think a lot of these developers are beginning to realize that they also compete with other sports. This isn't always true, but you have to convince the sports fan (not the baseball fan) that it is worth their time to play a baseball game and not football, basketball, soccer or hockey.
360 owners do have options. If the baseball game isn't worth their time, even if they love the sport, they'll find another option.
I highly doubt any company sits down all year and says: "We don't have anything to worry about here. No one can buy any other baseball game, so we're good to go no matter how awful the product." I realize people like to believe in these things because of their disappointment in other sport franchises, but it's simply not true.
But, what is true is: when a game routinely under-performs, despite innovation, competition or pride, someone is responsible for the poor performance. 2K has changed developers quite a few times over the past couple years.
It's easy to say they don't improve, but 2K is trying to improve. They wouldn't change developers, lead producers, etc. unless they wanted to. They see the issues and now it's just about finding the right team to take care of them.
We shall see if VC is the answer. Last year looked like a strong improvement. But, Brinkman also had a strong improvement in his year one and then tanked in year two. So, hopefully, history doesn't repeat itself here.
Comment