LOL I don't know... ESPN has to supply us with pictures in order for me to do that.
Why can't they get Fenway right?!?!!
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
LOL I don't know... ESPN has to supply us with pictures in order for me to do that. -
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " LockhartComment
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " LockhartComment
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " LockhartComment
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
myers4real said:
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " Lockhart
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Have you played any of the games? And if you really are 20 or however old you said you are then you need to grow up. Why are you in the forum for a different game bashing it when you haven't played any of them? Nobody cares about what you have to say so shut up.Originally posted by BlzerLet me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)Comment
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
myers4real said:
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " Lockhart
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Have you played any of the games? And if you really are 20 or however old you said you are then you need to grow up. Why are you in the forum for a different game bashing it when you haven't played any of them? Nobody cares about what you have to say so shut up.Originally posted by BlzerLet me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)Comment
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
myers4real said:
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " Lockhart
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Have you played any of the games? And if you really are 20 or however old you said you are then you need to grow up. Why are you in the forum for a different game bashing it when you haven't played any of them? Nobody cares about what you have to say so shut up.Originally posted by BlzerLet me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)Comment
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
myers4real said:
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " Lockhart
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Haven't you already been warned about this?
You're declaring MVP the winner when neither game is even close to release. Grow up.Comment
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
myers4real said:
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " Lockhart
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Haven't you already been warned about this?
You're declaring MVP the winner when neither game is even close to release. Grow up.Comment
-
Re: Why can\'t they get Fenway right?!?!!
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
myers4real said:
exsqueeze me? Fat Pitcher...well hello....I am not actually on your same brain wave length..I'm actually a little higher. Now I can deeply understand that you are upset due to all the time and effort you guys are putting into your programming of the ESPN baseball game that you've been working so hard on...only to realize that you guys are floating in the water and MVP 2004 has just sailed by you without giving you a second glance. Now I am not here to put down your efforts...just here to state facts. MVP 2004 was a LONG work in progress and is still being tweaked to become the #1 baseball sim/ game ever released thus far. Now ESPN made a couple of advancements using the same old engine...now if I was a part of your developement team..I would recommend highly re-changing the engine you guys are building on. Now the graphics are somewhat decent and you DID put out the best game last year..I will confess, but this year instead of LEAPING...you guys hopped...while MVP keeps taking huge LEAPS to improve what is already a fantastic engine ( the best out there ). Now if you compare graphics between ESPN and MVP there is no comparison. MVP's textures and bit mapping is far more advanced then what your company is usuing. ( winner MVP ). Options and abilities game wise....hands down MVP...playable minor leagues and everything else that has evolved and been put into EA's beauty...that apparantly you guys did not consider doing in your game or perhaps could not do. ( winner MVP ). No argument here...just accept defeat and know that your game will be second place this year and EA will be on time at the awards ceremony for best sports game 2004. Thanks and see ya.
Mark " I don't hide behind a fake name either " Lockhart
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Haven't you already been warned about this?
You're declaring MVP the winner when neither game is even close to release. Grow up.Comment
Comment