Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

**TIm** · 03-18-2004, 08:48 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

Fossen and sdrotar!!!!!!!!1 You no good son of a Just kidding hey thanks guys for doing what you do for us..This is the First site I come to everytime I turn on the computer....again thanks

**StretchedSA** · 03-18-2004, 10:42 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

"unpaid volunteers" aren't professionals....by definition of "professional"

**StretchedSA** · 03-18-2004, 10:42 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

"unpaid volunteers" aren't professionals....by definition of "professional"

**StretchedSA** · 03-18-2004, 10:42 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

"unpaid volunteers" aren't professionals....by definition of "professional"

**Shaver** · 03-18-2004, 10:50 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
StretchedSA said:
"unpaid volunteers" aren't professionals....by definition of "professional"

<hr /></blockquote>
Shawn is a professional writer for other outlets...

Shawn is a volunteer at OS...

This isn't rocket science, fellas!

**Shaver** · 03-18-2004, 10:50 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
StretchedSA said:
"unpaid volunteers" aren't professionals....by definition of "professional"

<hr /></blockquote>
Shawn is a professional writer for other outlets...

Shawn is a volunteer at OS...

This isn't rocket science, fellas!

**Shaver** · 03-18-2004, 10:50 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
StretchedSA said:
"unpaid volunteers" aren't professionals....by definition of "professional"

<hr /></blockquote>
Shawn is a professional writer for other outlets...

Shawn is a volunteer at OS...

This isn't rocket science, fellas!

**bkrich83** · 03-18-2004, 11:36 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Hank103 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
fossen said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Aeon said:
I have been made suspicious of your info's legitimacy by comments made by FatPitcher, and *if* it is true that false information has been passed along to us, then you have abused the trust that made this site great, and the basic trust between "preofessional writer" and audience. You'll hate that i said that, but it's the truth.

<hr /></blockquote>

Can I propose another look at this?

FatPitcher got upset that MVP got a good review. FatPitcher got upset that the game he QAs is getting no-so-great impressions. FatPitcher realized that OS is brutally honest, and won't extend credit because we've enjoyed past efforts. FatPitcher slandered a site that has been known for years as an impartial source of news and reviews.

Do I need to remind anyone that FatPitcher works for Sega? You joke that EA has paid off OS ..... Sega literally pays off FatPitcher. Weekly.

Which is cool. That's his job, and his inside information is invaluable. But let's not pretend he's in any way impartial.

<hr /></blockquote>

This is very interesting because in six months when madden comes out with the same game it has given us for the last three years your going to be reading Madden once again great game now you can use the rihgt and left trigger for some crap,give it a name with a fancy ring to it and walla 9.4 great game must buy.

<hr /></blockquote>

You must be new here, because the Maddenenites routinely call us Sega fanboys, because we have generally given ESPN Football better scores than Madden, and have liked ESPN more than Madden in the forums.

It's a no win situation, no matter what scores you give a game, some fanboy somewhere else is gonna get offended and try to call you out.

**bkrich83** · 03-18-2004, 11:36 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Hank103 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
fossen said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Aeon said:
I have been made suspicious of your info's legitimacy by comments made by FatPitcher, and *if* it is true that false information has been passed along to us, then you have abused the trust that made this site great, and the basic trust between "preofessional writer" and audience. You'll hate that i said that, but it's the truth.

<hr /></blockquote>

Can I propose another look at this?

FatPitcher got upset that MVP got a good review. FatPitcher got upset that the game he QAs is getting no-so-great impressions. FatPitcher realized that OS is brutally honest, and won't extend credit because we've enjoyed past efforts. FatPitcher slandered a site that has been known for years as an impartial source of news and reviews.

Do I need to remind anyone that FatPitcher works for Sega? You joke that EA has paid off OS ..... Sega literally pays off FatPitcher. Weekly.

Which is cool. That's his job, and his inside information is invaluable. But let's not pretend he's in any way impartial.

<hr /></blockquote>

This is very interesting because in six months when madden comes out with the same game it has given us for the last three years your going to be reading Madden once again great game now you can use the rihgt and left trigger for some crap,give it a name with a fancy ring to it and walla 9.4 great game must buy.

<hr /></blockquote>

You must be new here, because the Maddenenites routinely call us Sega fanboys, because we have generally given ESPN Football better scores than Madden, and have liked ESPN more than Madden in the forums.

It's a no win situation, no matter what scores you give a game, some fanboy somewhere else is gonna get offended and try to call you out.

**bkrich83** · 03-18-2004, 11:36 AM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Hank103 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
fossen said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Aeon said:
I have been made suspicious of your info's legitimacy by comments made by FatPitcher, and *if* it is true that false information has been passed along to us, then you have abused the trust that made this site great, and the basic trust between "preofessional writer" and audience. You'll hate that i said that, but it's the truth.

<hr /></blockquote>

Can I propose another look at this?

FatPitcher got upset that MVP got a good review. FatPitcher got upset that the game he QAs is getting no-so-great impressions. FatPitcher realized that OS is brutally honest, and won't extend credit because we've enjoyed past efforts. FatPitcher slandered a site that has been known for years as an impartial source of news and reviews.

Do I need to remind anyone that FatPitcher works for Sega? You joke that EA has paid off OS ..... Sega literally pays off FatPitcher. Weekly.

Which is cool. That's his job, and his inside information is invaluable. But let's not pretend he's in any way impartial.

<hr /></blockquote>

This is very interesting because in six months when madden comes out with the same game it has given us for the last three years your going to be reading Madden once again great game now you can use the rihgt and left trigger for some crap,give it a name with a fancy ring to it and walla 9.4 great game must buy.

<hr /></blockquote>

You must be new here, because the Maddenenites routinely call us Sega fanboys, because we have generally given ESPN Football better scores than Madden, and have liked ESPN more than Madden in the forums.

It's a no win situation, no matter what scores you give a game, some fanboy somewhere else is gonna get offended and try to call you out.

**Hank103** · 03-18-2004, 12:10 PM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
fossen said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Hank103 said:
This is very interesting because in six months when madden comes out with the same game it has given us for the last three years your going to be reading Madden once again great game now you can use the rihgt and left trigger for some crap,give it a name with a fancy ring to it and walla 9.4 great game must buy.

We love Madden?

You haven't been around long, have you?

<hr /></blockquote>

Don't judge me by the number of post I have made. If you look at the registtration date you would see that I've been registered a while, however I don't post that much as a matter of fact I have been visiting this sight before you even had to register. I'm not saying that you like Madden what I'm saying is that WSB was the champ last year and in any sport you have to go up against the champ to beat the champ and from what I've seen so far ESPN hasn't even entered the ring yet and the fight has already been decided.

Oh, I'm not sure if you were infering that ESPN has regressed, but if so the only thing ESPN is guilty of is Maddenism, which is taking a game with a solid base, making some graphical and gameplay improvements and add in a gimmick or two with a fancy name of course, boxing it and selling it. The dividing line between the two, Madden is a household name.

**Hank103** · 03-18-2004, 12:10 PM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
fossen said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Hank103 said:
This is very interesting because in six months when madden comes out with the same game it has given us for the last three years your going to be reading Madden once again great game now you can use the rihgt and left trigger for some crap,give it a name with a fancy ring to it and walla 9.4 great game must buy.

We love Madden?

You haven't been around long, have you?

<hr /></blockquote>

Don't judge me by the number of post I have made. If you look at the registtration date you would see that I've been registered a while, however I don't post that much as a matter of fact I have been visiting this sight before you even had to register. I'm not saying that you like Madden what I'm saying is that WSB was the champ last year and in any sport you have to go up against the champ to beat the champ and from what I've seen so far ESPN hasn't even entered the ring yet and the fight has already been decided.

Oh, I'm not sure if you were infering that ESPN has regressed, but if so the only thing ESPN is guilty of is Maddenism, which is taking a game with a solid base, making some graphical and gameplay improvements and add in a gimmick or two with a fancy name of course, boxing it and selling it. The dividing line between the two, Madden is a household name.

**Hank103** · 03-18-2004, 12:10 PM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
fossen said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Hank103 said:
This is very interesting because in six months when madden comes out with the same game it has given us for the last three years your going to be reading Madden once again great game now you can use the rihgt and left trigger for some crap,give it a name with a fancy ring to it and walla 9.4 great game must buy.

We love Madden?

You haven't been around long, have you?

<hr /></blockquote>

Don't judge me by the number of post I have made. If you look at the registtration date you would see that I've been registered a while, however I don't post that much as a matter of fact I have been visiting this sight before you even had to register. I'm not saying that you like Madden what I'm saying is that WSB was the champ last year and in any sport you have to go up against the champ to beat the champ and from what I've seen so far ESPN hasn't even entered the ring yet and the fight has already been decided.

Oh, I'm not sure if you were infering that ESPN has regressed, but if so the only thing ESPN is guilty of is Maddenism, which is taking a game with a solid base, making some graphical and gameplay improvements and add in a gimmick or two with a fancy name of course, boxing it and selling it. The dividing line between the two, Madden is a household name.

**captaink** · 03-18-2004, 12:45 PM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Clay_OS said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Hank103 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
fossen said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Aeon said:
I have been made suspicious of your info's legitimacy by comments made by FatPitcher, and *if* it is true that false information has been passed along to us, then you have abused the trust that made this site great, and the basic trust between "preofessional writer" and audience. You'll hate that i said that, but it's the truth.

<hr /></blockquote>

Can I propose another look at this?

FatPitcher got upset that MVP got a good review. FatPitcher got upset that the game he QAs is getting no-so-great impressions. FatPitcher realized that OS is brutally honest, and won't extend credit because we've enjoyed past efforts. FatPitcher slandered a site that has been known for years as an impartial source of news and reviews.

Do I need to remind anyone that FatPitcher works for Sega? You joke that EA has paid off OS ..... Sega literally pays off FatPitcher. Weekly.

Which is cool. That's his job, and his inside information is invaluable. But let's not pretend he's in any way impartial.

<hr /></blockquote>

This is very interesting because in six months when madden comes out with the same game it has given us for the last three years your going to be reading Madden once again great game now you can use the rihgt and left trigger for some crap,give it a name with a fancy ring to it and walla 9.4 great game must buy.

<hr /></blockquote>
(a) We don't give 1-10 scores

(b) If Madden is a 9.4 this year and they don't do anything to regress, what should they be scored?

(c) Reviews are opinions. They are going to be different site to site or even Staffer to Staffer. Likes and dislikes aren't black and white.

<hr /></blockquote>

Very interesting, taking these comments into consideration then ESPN MLB should get no lower than a 93 consider that's what WSB2K3 received last year from OS and since the didn't change much with the gameplay and added a few extra features, going buy these comments ESPNMLB should get at least a 94.

**captaink** · 03-18-2004, 12:45 PM

Re: Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Clay_OS said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Hank103 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
fossen said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Aeon said:
I have been made suspicious of your info's legitimacy by comments made by FatPitcher, and *if* it is true that false information has been passed along to us, then you have abused the trust that made this site great, and the basic trust between "preofessional writer" and audience. You'll hate that i said that, but it's the truth.

<hr /></blockquote>

Can I propose another look at this?

FatPitcher got upset that MVP got a good review. FatPitcher got upset that the game he QAs is getting no-so-great impressions. FatPitcher realized that OS is brutally honest, and won't extend credit because we've enjoyed past efforts. FatPitcher slandered a site that has been known for years as an impartial source of news and reviews.

Do I need to remind anyone that FatPitcher works for Sega? You joke that EA has paid off OS ..... Sega literally pays off FatPitcher. Weekly.

Which is cool. That's his job, and his inside information is invaluable. But let's not pretend he's in any way impartial.

<hr /></blockquote>

This is very interesting because in six months when madden comes out with the same game it has given us for the last three years your going to be reading Madden once again great game now you can use the rihgt and left trigger for some crap,give it a name with a fancy ring to it and walla 9.4 great game must buy.

<hr /></blockquote>
(a) We don't give 1-10 scores

(b) If Madden is a 9.4 this year and they don't do anything to regress, what should they be scored?

(c) Reviews are opinions. They are going to be different site to site or even Staffer to Staffer. Likes and dislikes aren't black and white.

<hr /></blockquote>

Very interesting, taking these comments into consideration then ESPN MLB should get no lower than a 93 consider that's what WSB2K3 received last year from OS and since the didn't change much with the gameplay and added a few extra features, going buy these comments ESPNMLB should get at least a 94.

Why are you not Responding to questions about the Beta Copy

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment