Well, you have a right to your opinon. But imo whoever wins the seires if it's Detroit or St. louis is the best team at the end of the year. It always about how you finish in the race to the end. And IF st. louis wins they finished the race in 1st.
I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
Well, you have a right to your opinon. But imo whoever wins the seires if it's Detroit or St. louis is the best team at the end of the year. It always about how you finish in the race to the end. And IF st. louis wins they finished the race in 1st.My Teams
NCAA: Arkansas Razorbacks
MLB: St. Louis Cardinals
NFL: Dallas Cowboys
.
.
.
NBA: Memphis Grizzlies -
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
I don't think one 7 game series can prove one league is better than the other. I think most people would agree that taking in to account all teams, the AL is better as a whole. I think if every team in the AL plays every team in the NL in 7 games series, the AL will come out on top the majority of the time. It's my opinion, but I still think the AL is the better league no matter who wins the series.MLB: Rays
NCAA: Michigan and Florida
NFL: 49ers
NHL: Lightning and DucksComment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
The whole point is this. Before the series people looked at the Cards and the NL like a complete joke. But now look,people see the NL is far more formidable than people thought it was.
IMHO regular season records are meaningless if it is not carried over into the playoffs. The Seattle team of 2001 that won 116 games but lost in the ALCS is a perfect example because noone even remembers them now.
The fact that the AL dominated interleague play is meaningless if it is not carried over into the series. Plus if the Tigers dont comeback from being 3-1 no one will ever remember it anyways.Comment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
Just because a team is hot at the right time doesn't always mean it's the best team. That's just the way I see it.Comment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
Depends on the person I guess. IMO an average team that backpeddles into the playoffs can catch a hot streak and win the entire thing whereas a dominant team through a 162 game season can catch a cold streak and get knocked out in round 1 of the playoffs. Who's the better overall team? IMO it's the team that dominated during the 162 game season. Then again, I typically go with the larger sample size because there is less room for error.
Just because a team is hot at the right time doesn't always mean it's the best team. That's just the way I see it.My Teams
NCAA: Arkansas Razorbacks
MLB: St. Louis Cardinals
NFL: Dallas Cowboys
.
.
.
NBA: Memphis GrizzliesComment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
There is no reward for "the best team", but there is a reward for the "champion".
Even though the AL dominated the NL in Interleague play for THIS season it doesn't really mean all that much now. The previous championships the AL has won in the previous years mean much more than that. However, this year it appears the NL will win the championship.NCAA Vets League: Arkansas Razorbacks (9-2, 6-1)
MLB OS League: Seattle Mariners (9-2)Comment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
BGarrett has pretty much already said everything that I was going to add.Comment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
I'm looking at this realistically. Sample size is the key as the larger the sample, the smaller the margin of error. I'm not discrediting the Cards if they win, I just think there were better overall teams throughout the year.Last edited by mjb2124; 10-27-2006, 02:35 PM.Comment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
Yes I do think the Colts were the better overall team. The Steelers got hot at the right time and won it when it mattered. During the season the Colts were the better team and so were the Bengals and a few other's.
I'm looking at this realistically. Sample size is the key as the larger the sample, the smaller the margin of error. I'm not discrediting the Cards if they win, I just think there were better overall teams throughout the year.Comment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
[QUOTE=mjb2124;2725513]Yes I do think the Colts were the better overall team. The Steelers got hot at the right time and won it when it mattered. During the season the Colts were the better team and so were the Bengals and a few other's.
I'm looking at this realistically. Sample size is the key as the larger the sample, the smaller the margin of error. I'm not discrediting the Cards if they win, I just think there were better overall teams throughout the year.[/QUOTE
yeah, I agree that there were better overall teams throughout the year. I'm just saying whoever wins the WS should be considered the best team at the end of the year. Just like the Steelers proved to be last year.My Teams
NCAA: Arkansas Razorbacks
MLB: St. Louis Cardinals
NFL: Dallas Cowboys
.
.
.
NBA: Memphis GrizzliesComment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
when it comes to determining which league is overall better?....interleague play means more in determining that imo. It's a much larger sample to draw from. imo you cant determine a league is better because a team from that league won the championship.Comment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
IMO an average team that backpeddles into the playoffs can catch a hot streak and win the entire thing whereas a dominant team through a 162 game season can catch a cold streak and get knocked out in round 1 of the playoffs. Who's the better overall team? IMO it's the team that dominated during the 162 game season. Then again, I typically go with the larger sample size because there is less room for error.
Just because a team is hot at the right time doesn't always mean it's the best team. That's just the way I see it.
If a team is so dominate during the regular season, why can't they duplicate that performance in the playoffs, considering no traumtic changes (injuries, etc.). The playoffs bring added pressure and better competition, who are as equally as talented or MORE talented than the teams they play against. And contrary to the regular season, there are no added benefits of a weak schedule and there is NO room for error considering the small sample sizes. Simply put it, the playoffs raise the standards and if you do not bring your A game, your undeserving. The best teams may not always fit these requirements.
The playoffs in any case should validate a team's regular season. Let's use 2006 UConn for an example. They were ranked highly throughout the college b-ball regular season, but they lost to George Mason in the regional finals. Does this exactly mean George Mason is the better team overall? No, but on that one day, where any useless regular season stat that showed UConn's clear advantage was disregarded, on that one given day, George Mason won and was clearly the better team.
The playoffs are a crapshoot, and while the best team might not always win, they are VERY DESERVING to win.Last edited by Chip Douglass; 10-27-2006, 08:52 PM.I write things on the Internet.
Comment
-
Re: I hate to root for the Cardinals but......
Depends on the person I guess. IMO an average team that backpeddles into the playoffs can catch a hot streak and win the entire thing whereas a dominant team through a 162 game season can catch a cold streak and get knocked out in round 1 of the playoffs. Who's the better overall team? IMO it's the team that dominated during the 162 game season. Then again, I typically go with the larger sample size because there is less room for error.
Just because a team is hot at the right time doesn't always mean it's the best team. That's just the way I see it.Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists AssociationComment
-
Comment
Comment