The Phillies...

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TwelveozPlaya21
    Banned
    • Jan 2003
    • 1249

    #46
    Re: The Phillies...

    don't get me wrong i do think thome will struggle the first maybe 2 months being here, but once he gets used to the pitching ect he will do what he does best hit homeruns and gets rbi's he will help the phils to the world series maybe in 2 years

    Comment

    • TwelveozPlaya21
      Banned
      • Jan 2003
      • 1249

      #47
      Re: The Phillies...

      don't get me wrong i do think thome will struggle the first maybe 2 months being here, but once he gets used to the pitching ect he will do what he does best hit homeruns and gets rbi's he will help the phils to the world series maybe in 2 years

      Comment

      • Diablo25
        Pro
        • Nov 2002
        • 833

        #48
        Re: The Phillies...

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        Not only will he have to face a whole new league, he will have to play 81 games at one of the best pitchers park in the NL.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        The Vet is one of the best HITTER'S parks in the league. It may be ugly but hitters love hitting there.

        Comment

        • Diablo25
          Pro
          • Nov 2002
          • 833

          #49
          Re: The Phillies...

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          Not only will he have to face a whole new league, he will have to play 81 games at one of the best pitchers park in the NL.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          The Vet is one of the best HITTER'S parks in the league. It may be ugly but hitters love hitting there.

          Comment

          • DragDashOn
            Rookie
            • Jul 2002
            • 497

            #50
            Re: The Phillies...

            Sorry Diablo, you are wrong.

            2002 Vet Park factor was a 91. Tied for the lowest in the NL with LA and SF.

            -Bobby Abreu= BA 43 pts higher on the road. 4 more HR's on the road
            -Marlon Anderson= BA 52 pts higher on the road
            -Pat Burrell= BA 26 pts higher on the road
            -Travis Lee= BA 79 pts higher on the road
            -Jimmy Rollins= BA 28 pts higher on the road. 5 more HR's on the road
            -Scott Rolen= BA 18 pts higher on the road.
            -Doug Glanville= BA 30 pts higher on the road.

            Of the 8 regular starters, 7 had a significantly higher BA on the road. The only player who had a higher home BA was Liebrethal, and that was a whopping 1 pt higher (280-279). That is not a coincidence.

            Comment

            • DragDashOn
              Rookie
              • Jul 2002
              • 497

              #51
              Re: The Phillies...

              Sorry Diablo, you are wrong.

              2002 Vet Park factor was a 91. Tied for the lowest in the NL with LA and SF.

              -Bobby Abreu= BA 43 pts higher on the road. 4 more HR's on the road
              -Marlon Anderson= BA 52 pts higher on the road
              -Pat Burrell= BA 26 pts higher on the road
              -Travis Lee= BA 79 pts higher on the road
              -Jimmy Rollins= BA 28 pts higher on the road. 5 more HR's on the road
              -Scott Rolen= BA 18 pts higher on the road.
              -Doug Glanville= BA 30 pts higher on the road.

              Of the 8 regular starters, 7 had a significantly higher BA on the road. The only player who had a higher home BA was Liebrethal, and that was a whopping 1 pt higher (280-279). That is not a coincidence.

              Comment

              • Diablo25
                Pro
                • Nov 2002
                • 833

                #52
                Re: The Phillies...

                Talk to any big leaguer and they will tell you they love hitting there. The fact that the players you mentioned have higher averages on the road means diddily to me. Since the Vet has opened it has always been know as a hitters park. The ball carries well, its artificial turf and the gaps are big. Put the calulator away.

                Comment

                • Diablo25
                  Pro
                  • Nov 2002
                  • 833

                  #53
                  Re: The Phillies...

                  Talk to any big leaguer and they will tell you they love hitting there. The fact that the players you mentioned have higher averages on the road means diddily to me. Since the Vet has opened it has always been know as a hitters park. The ball carries well, its artificial turf and the gaps are big. Put the calulator away.

                  Comment

                  • Autoproxy
                    Rookie
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 371

                    #54
                    Re: The Phillies...

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    Since the Vet has opened it has always been known as a hitters park.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    The Vet was a hitters park when it first opened, but because it opened many years ago a number of parks have been built that have cozier dimensions that helps increase the number of home runs and therefore hitting stats. Old Stadiums are generally bigger, which is why Dodger stadium, Shea stadium and the Vet play as pitchers parks and suppress runs. I guess Atlanta is an anamoly because Turner probably built it so the Braves pitching would still thrive.

                    btw...the jury is still out on Millwood as a number 1 starter, randy wolf and brandon duckworth...the phillies have questions in pitching, the mets have questions on offense and the braves have questions all over the place....based on that, I say Mets, Phillies then Braves (unless Burrell and Thome combine for 100 homers...which is a scary possibility)

                    Comment

                    • Autoproxy
                      Rookie
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 371

                      #55
                      Re: The Phillies...

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      Since the Vet has opened it has always been known as a hitters park.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      The Vet was a hitters park when it first opened, but because it opened many years ago a number of parks have been built that have cozier dimensions that helps increase the number of home runs and therefore hitting stats. Old Stadiums are generally bigger, which is why Dodger stadium, Shea stadium and the Vet play as pitchers parks and suppress runs. I guess Atlanta is an anamoly because Turner probably built it so the Braves pitching would still thrive.

                      btw...the jury is still out on Millwood as a number 1 starter, randy wolf and brandon duckworth...the phillies have questions in pitching, the mets have questions on offense and the braves have questions all over the place....based on that, I say Mets, Phillies then Braves (unless Burrell and Thome combine for 100 homers...which is a scary possibility)

                      Comment

                      • DragDashOn
                        Rookie
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 497

                        #56
                        Re: The Phillies...

                        the astrofield has also made it more of a pitcher's park.

                        Comment

                        • DragDashOn
                          Rookie
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 497

                          #57
                          Re: The Phillies...

                          the astrofield has also made it more of a pitcher's park.

                          Comment

                          • Diablo25
                            Pro
                            • Nov 2002
                            • 833

                            #58
                            Re: The Phillies...

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            The Vet was a hitters park when it first opened, but because it opened many years ago a number of parks have been built that have cozier dimensions that helps increase the number of home runs and therefore hitting stats. Old Stadiums are generally bigger, which is why Dodger stadium, Shea stadium and the Vet play as pitchers parks and suppress runs.

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            I politely disagree with you on some of this. I'll agree that its not the hitters park it used to be because of new stadiums like Coors and Minute Maid Park but the Vet was never really a power/HR hitters park. The big gaps and artificial turf are what makes it a hitters park and thats why I still consider it a hitters park. The hitting backround at the Vet has always been praised too. Many hitters claim to see the ball very well there. If you've ever hit at a high level you know how that can play on you mentally. Artificial turf is a nightmare to alot of pitchers because the ball shoots to the wall much more quickly than on grass. Artificial turf is more of an advantage to hitters than pitchers. Good points though.

                            Comment

                            • Diablo25
                              Pro
                              • Nov 2002
                              • 833

                              #59
                              Re: The Phillies...

                              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                              The Vet was a hitters park when it first opened, but because it opened many years ago a number of parks have been built that have cozier dimensions that helps increase the number of home runs and therefore hitting stats. Old Stadiums are generally bigger, which is why Dodger stadium, Shea stadium and the Vet play as pitchers parks and suppress runs.

                              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                              I politely disagree with you on some of this. I'll agree that its not the hitters park it used to be because of new stadiums like Coors and Minute Maid Park but the Vet was never really a power/HR hitters park. The big gaps and artificial turf are what makes it a hitters park and thats why I still consider it a hitters park. The hitting backround at the Vet has always been praised too. Many hitters claim to see the ball very well there. If you've ever hit at a high level you know how that can play on you mentally. Artificial turf is a nightmare to alot of pitchers because the ball shoots to the wall much more quickly than on grass. Artificial turf is more of an advantage to hitters than pitchers. Good points though.

                              Comment

                              Working...