EGM Scores

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • triplej96
    24fps
    • Aug 2002
    • 2152

    #16
    Re: EGM Scores

    Could someone write the reviews from the EGM mag thanks! Just for the baseball games.
    -Josh

    Comment

    • triplej96
      24fps
      • Aug 2002
      • 2152

      #17
      Re: EGM Scores

      Could someone write the reviews from the EGM mag thanks! Just for the baseball games.
      -Josh

      Comment

      • GSTK02
        Rookie
        • Oct 2002
        • 193

        #18
        Re: EGM Scores

        Do tthey have the beta version of Wsb

        Comment

        • GSTK02
          Rookie
          • Oct 2002
          • 193

          #19
          Re: EGM Scores

          Do tthey have the beta version of Wsb

          Comment

          • imported_Administrator
            All Star
            • Jul 2002
            • 7137

            #20
            Re: EGM Scores

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker 9.5, 10, 10


            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            EGM Suxorz and r PS2 fanoyz... Zelda iz a 10 yo. Famitsu said so.

            Now on a serious note I do not put alot of credit into the 1 man EGM reviews (which can make gamepro reviews read like Moby Dick) as sometimes you question how much time thye spent. At least when they roundtable you get a few different opinions on the game and some actual content.



            Hopefully none of the WSB fans have hung themselves due to getting a point lower score.

            Comment

            • imported_Administrator
              All Star
              • Jul 2002
              • 7137

              #21
              Re: EGM Scores

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker 9.5, 10, 10


              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              EGM Suxorz and r PS2 fanoyz... Zelda iz a 10 yo. Famitsu said so.

              Now on a serious note I do not put alot of credit into the 1 man EGM reviews (which can make gamepro reviews read like Moby Dick) as sometimes you question how much time thye spent. At least when they roundtable you get a few different opinions on the game and some actual content.



              Hopefully none of the WSB fans have hung themselves due to getting a point lower score.

              Comment

              • GotQueen16
                Rookie
                • Dec 2002
                • 386

                #22
                Re: EGM Scores

                Didn't it get ~8 last year. I know it was GotM, but it didn't get really high scores. The new EGM reviewers kinda suck anyway.

                Comment

                • GotQueen16
                  Rookie
                  • Dec 2002
                  • 386

                  #23
                  Re: EGM Scores

                  Didn't it get ~8 last year. I know it was GotM, but it didn't get really high scores. The new EGM reviewers kinda suck anyway.

                  Comment

                  • maverick
                    Rookie
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 40

                    #24
                    Re: EGM Scores

                    I wouldn't put too much stock in these scores considering there's no way the reviews were based on 100% completed versions of the games. Monthly publications' content can be months old before they even hit the newsstands. At best, EGM's baseball game reviews were written 5 weeks ago; 4 if they really, really tempted fate with their printer deadlines/circulation dept. This is why game reviews on the net are so valuable (even, dare I say, the painful-to-read, grammatically-challenged IGN ones): you don't need a whole lot of lead time to get a review published. Even if the reviews are based on 90%-finished copies (responsible publications should say so), you shouldn't get too bent out of shape over them. Lots can happen during the final phases in the game's development.

                    Comment

                    • maverick
                      Rookie
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 40

                      #25
                      Re: EGM Scores

                      I wouldn't put too much stock in these scores considering there's no way the reviews were based on 100% completed versions of the games. Monthly publications' content can be months old before they even hit the newsstands. At best, EGM's baseball game reviews were written 5 weeks ago; 4 if they really, really tempted fate with their printer deadlines/circulation dept. This is why game reviews on the net are so valuable (even, dare I say, the painful-to-read, grammatically-challenged IGN ones): you don't need a whole lot of lead time to get a review published. Even if the reviews are based on 90%-finished copies (responsible publications should say so), you shouldn't get too bent out of shape over them. Lots can happen during the final phases in the game's development.

                      Comment

                      • TedTurner
                        Banned
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 645

                        #26
                        Re: EGM Scores

                        Anyone know the category scores ?

                        Gameplay Graphics ect.

                        What are the bold comments in the review ?

                        Comment

                        • TedTurner
                          Banned
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 645

                          #27
                          Re: EGM Scores

                          Anyone know the category scores ?

                          Gameplay Graphics ect.

                          What are the bold comments in the review ?

                          Comment

                          • GotQueen16
                            Rookie
                            • Dec 2002
                            • 386

                            #28
                            Re: EGM Scores

                            They only review games that the publishers says are reviewable. So I am sure they were 100% complete. And they go to press about a week to a week and a half before they ship, they have said that many times on their own board.

                            Comment

                            • GotQueen16
                              Rookie
                              • Dec 2002
                              • 386

                              #29
                              Re: EGM Scores

                              They only review games that the publishers says are reviewable. So I am sure they were 100% complete. And they go to press about a week to a week and a half before they ship, they have said that many times on their own board.

                              Comment

                              • captaink
                                Pro
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 593

                                #30
                                Re: EGM Scores

                                I love how in the WSB2k3 review the reviewer indicates that in a two player game it's like a game of hide and seek with the cursors, but what he fails to mention is that you don't have to play with the pitching cursor on.

                                Comment

                                Working...