Exactly, the gameplay score would have had to go down at least 3 points because that would basically mean that you need to let every ball drop so that you can field it.
POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
Exactly, the gameplay score would have had to go down at least 3 points because that would basically mean that you need to let every ball drop so that you can field it."If y’all see me in the news, and I make the news for something that I ain’t got no business making it for, don’t bash me. Say it was a young guy living."
- Clinton Portis -
Re: POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
Exactly, the gameplay score would have had to go down at least 3 points because that would basically mean that you need to let every ball drop so that you can field it."If y’all see me in the news, and I make the news for something that I ain’t got no business making it for, don’t bash me. Say it was a young guy living."
- Clinton PortisComment
-
Re: POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
let's wait until we play the game before we label it as "soooooo buggy".Comment
-
Re: POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
let's wait until we play the game before we label it as "soooooo buggy".Comment
-
Re: POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
let's wait until we play the game before we label it as "soooooo buggy".
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
"soooooooo" true. It is almost a given that IGN based the review off of the same 85% build that Steve got. Speaking of that, I never heard Steve make a single mention of what IGN said. I am not saying it won't be in the final version, but I would be surprised if it is anywhere near as bad as IGN made it out to be. They are notorious for blowing things out of proportion.
Once every game or two is no big deal to me, 5 times a game would piss me off.Comment
-
Re: POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
let's wait until we play the game before we label it as "soooooo buggy".
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
"soooooooo" true. It is almost a given that IGN based the review off of the same 85% build that Steve got. Speaking of that, I never heard Steve make a single mention of what IGN said. I am not saying it won't be in the final version, but I would be surprised if it is anywhere near as bad as IGN made it out to be. They are notorious for blowing things out of proportion.
Once every game or two is no big deal to me, 5 times a game would piss me off.Comment
-
Re: POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
It really depends when the bugs occur. If they happen to affect your game tremendously (cost you a run or two a game) this is going to be a major downfall. However, if they happen at insignificant times where you can adjust and not let it affect the game, I don't see it to be that big of a deal. But I agree, we should wait to see for ourselves and read a decent review!! I know I am still up in the air is terms of WSB and MVP!Comment
-
Re: POST IGN.COM MVP 2003 REVIEW IMPRESSIONS HERE...
It really depends when the bugs occur. If they happen to affect your game tremendously (cost you a run or two a game) this is going to be a major downfall. However, if they happen at insignificant times where you can adjust and not let it affect the game, I don't see it to be that big of a deal. But I agree, we should wait to see for ourselves and read a decent review!! I know I am still up in the air is terms of WSB and MVP!Comment
Comment