MVP Graphics VS WSB Graphics
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
MVP Graphics VS WSB Graphics
I thought MVP would be better from the videos and everything but I was wrong. The on field action looks good but the stadiums need serious work. They just look like a painted background. The clouds don't move, the colors are faded, ect. The main reason I got this game was because I thought it would look the most realistic with the stances and all. I was wrong though. Still a good game but I think WSB may have it beat as far as Graphics.***My Teams***
NCAA - Oklahoma Sooners
MLB - St. Louis Cardinals
NFL - Dallas Cowboys
NBA - Oklahoma City ThunderTags: None -
Re: MVP Graphics VS WSB Graphics
Agreed!
Everything, with the exception of the player models looks PS2 washed out! I think it's pretty obvious which platform they used for primary development. Also, where is my "day" option? Sometimes, I'd like to enjoy a nice bright afternoon game.
Also, the players are still "squatty" looking. I'd also like more variety in pitching and throwing motions, but maybe next year.
Background graphics aside, I really like the feel of this game and I'll give it more time to determine how much I'll play it vs WSB. Maybe the graphics will be much improved on the PC version?Comment
-
Re: MVP Graphics VS WSB Graphics
Agreed!
Everything, with the exception of the player models looks PS2 washed out! I think it's pretty obvious which platform they used for primary development. Also, where is my "day" option? Sometimes, I'd like to enjoy a nice bright afternoon game.
Also, the players are still "squatty" looking. I'd also like more variety in pitching and throwing motions, but maybe next year.
Background graphics aside, I really like the feel of this game and I'll give it more time to determine how much I'll play it vs WSB. Maybe the graphics will be much improved on the PC version?Comment
Comment