Okay, I just got my game informer, and the only reason I got this was because it was 5 bucks a year, and now I know why, I saw that they reviewed the baseball titles this year, and I wondered how they reviewed them, and they said WSB was the worse of them all, with a 6.75 for the ps2, and a 7 for the xbox. Ouch! Now this gets worse a lot worse, hh ps2-7, xbox-7.25, asb ps2-8, xbox-8, mvp ps2-9.25 xbox-9.25, and slugfest got a 6 for ps2 and a 6.75 for the xbox and somehow mlb2004 managed a 6.5. Ummm, somebody agree with me, I mean I usually do not follow ign.com, but they atleast had there stuff together, I am not taking away from mvp, for a first yr title, its better than I expected, but to be worse than asb, hh, almost mlb2004 and slugfest, I dunno, I played mvp, hh, asb, and returned them all for wsb, but none else compares, wsb is on its own levels, they said that wsb needs better gameplay, man I am really upset, hopefully someone will rejoice with me, and make me calm down, this is bull, well read and post, all forums, see y'all soon
Peace
Peace
that. No, seriously, they are against WSB for some reason. Well, at least I know what baseball games are good. 
Comment