Lets go Pitt....I agree that debates like this not only make this board great, but are the reason baseball is FAR better than any other sport. With that, here's all the reasons you're wrong.

"Having had to watch Al Martin for years with the Pirates, I must disagree with this statement. And that was before he was old."
Al Martin had 7 years with more than 10 homers. How many current pitchers can say that?
"I know this, but do you really think an AL manager would do this if the option presented itself?"
If Mike Hampton were THAT good, than ya, he would.
"That's like saying a winter coat isn't necessary in the tropics because it's not cold there. Having a pitcher who's given up 2 runs in 7 innings, yet is coming to bat in a crucial moment in the game adds (god forbid) thought and strategy into the game. I fully believe that an AL manager could take a nap during the game, and be woken up only when the pitching coach nudges him and says "Joe Blow out there is looking tired" and their overall success would not be changed."
I agree that it would add more strategy, but you're missing my point. I'd GLADLY give up that extra bit of watching a manager think if it guarantees me GETTING TO WATCH THE PITCHER SOME MORE. What's better, watching Cox stress over wether to hit for Maddux, or watching Maddux actually pitch???? Sometimes strategy takes away from the fundamental joys of the game.
"This makes no sense. From what you're saying, you almost have to play for the 3 run homer all the time to have a chance (not true, but this is what you're telling me). If this is the case, you wouldn't want to risk losing baserunners by running steals or hit and runs.:
Again, not true. AL teams often play hit and run to avoid a double play to make sure their big guns get up. And I said you have to score more runs, not hit a 3 run homer.
As for the it's better argument, that can't be proven either way, but from all the baseball I watch, it is my opinion that there are more good pitchers and more good hitters in the AL.
Comment